Game Recap
The Tampa Bay Lightning posted a 3-0 shutout against the Philadelphia Flyers on Monday. TBL held a slight 6-4 edge in high-danger chances. The numbers backed up the result — TBL generated 7.75 expected goals to PHI's 6.49 at 5-on-5 (49.4% Corsi). Hagel put up 2 goals. Shots on goal: TBL 18, PHI 20.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Philadelphia Flyers vs Tampa Bay Lightning progressed on Nov 24, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
PHI0 - 3TBL
Nov 24, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| TBL | P1 | 16 | 12 | 57.1 | 10 | 10 | 50.0 | 7 | 4 | 63.6 | 12 | 10 | 54.5 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | 3.00 | 2.37 | 55.9 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 13 | 13 | 50.0 | 8 | 11 | 42.1 | 5 | 7 | 41.7 | 10 | 8 | 55.6 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | 2.87 | 1.87 | 60.6 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 16 | 18 | 47.1 | 13 | 12 | 52.0 | 6 | 9 | 40.0 | 14 | 15 | 48.3 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 3.55 | 3.12 | 53.2 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 45 | 43 | 51.1 | 31 | 33 | 48.4 | 18 | 20 | 47.4 | 36 | 33 | 52.2 | 8 | 5 | 61.5 | 9.42 | 7.36 | 56.1 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| PHI | P1 | 12 | 16 | 42.9 | 10 | 10 | 50.0 | 4 | 7 | 36.4 | 10 | 12 | 45.5 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | 2.37 | 3.00 | 44.1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 13 | 13 | 50.0 | 11 | 8 | 57.9 | 7 | 5 | 58.3 | 8 | 10 | 44.4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | 1.87 | 2.87 | 39.4 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 18 | 16 | 52.9 | 12 | 13 | 48.0 | 9 | 6 | 60.0 | 15 | 14 | 51.7 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 3.12 | 3.55 | 46.8 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 43 | 45 | 48.9 | 33 | 31 | 51.6 | 20 | 18 | 52.6 | 33 | 36 | 47.8 | 5 | 8 | 38.5 | 7.36 | 9.42 | 43.9 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | |
Win Probability
TBL Favored
PHI Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
TBL
PHI
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
PHI Attempts
TBL Attempts
Individual Event Map
PHI ShootTBL Shoot
Save
Missed Shot Against
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (TBL) performed against every skater on the away team (PHI) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = TBL players, Columns = PHI players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the TBL player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| TBL ↓ / PHI → | Zegras | Dvorak | Couturier | Abols | Cates | Deslauriers | Foerster | Konecny | Tippett | Brink | Michkov | Hathaway | York | Sanheim | Drysdale | Seeler | Zamula | Andrae |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cirelli | 63 | 64 | 40 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 25 | 25 | 64 | 54 | 38 | 100 | 53 | 38 | 45 | 62 | 56 | 67 |
| Guentzel | 63 | 69 | 50 | — | 0 | — | 25 | 0 | 50 | 30 | 33 | 100 | 64 | 60 | 43 | 14 | 33 | 50 |
| James | 56 | 67 | 33 | 100 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 56 | 40 | 45 | 100 | 60 | 63 | 44 | 17 | 43 | 44 |
| Gourde | 50 | — | 0 | 50 | 53 | 100 | 44 | 44 | — | — | 0 | 100 | 60 | 56 | 20 | 40 | 50 | 25 |
| Girgensons | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 47 | — | 39 | 39 | — | — | 0 | — | 44 | 50 | 17 | 40 | 50 | 25 |
| Goncalves | 67 | 75 | 20 | — | 0 | — | 33 | 33 | 57 | 33 | 20 | 100 | 60 | 50 | 57 | 33 | 43 | 40 |
| Finley | 100 | 100 | 67 | 90 | — | 90 | 100 | 100 | — | 75 | 67 | 90 | 80 | 75 | 86 | 100 | 100 | 83 |
| Douglas | 100 | 100 | 100 | 91 | — | 90 | 100 | 100 | — | 100 | 100 | 90 | 100 | 100 | 88 | 100 | 100 | 83 |
| Hagel | 61 | 62 | 38 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 38 | 62 | 50 | 40 | 100 | 58 | 40 | 45 | 62 | 56 | 57 |
| Paul | 0 | 80 | 67 | 0 | 50 | — | 41 | 41 | — | — | 0 | — | 62 | 62 | 20 | 40 | 50 | 25 |
| Kucherov | 60 | 63 | 46 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 40 | 17 | 57 | 44 | 38 | 100 | 60 | 48 | 33 | 53 | 56 | 50 |
| Bjorkstrand | — | 80 | 75 | 90 | — | 89 | 50 | — | — | 71 | 83 | 90 | 88 | 75 | 86 | 75 | 100 | 78 |
| Moser | 63 | 62 | 67 | 100 | 30 | 100 | 33 | 29 | 58 | 100 | 57 | 100 | 53 | 54 | 50 | 63 | 67 | 43 |
| Raddysh | 70 | 67 | 57 | 100 | 29 | — | 27 | 18 | 60 | 75 | 60 | 100 | 58 | 61 | 29 | 50 | 63 | 25 |
| Lilleberg | 56 | 70 | 33 | 67 | 46 | 100 | 47 | 47 | 60 | 43 | 36 | 100 | 50 | 35 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 64 |
| D'Astous | 50 | 63 | 33 | 67 | 50 | 100 | 46 | 42 | 56 | 36 | 38 | 100 | 53 | 39 | 36 | 43 | 44 | 56 |
| Carlile | 67 | 50 | 38 | 90 | — | 90 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 44 | 38 | 90 | 100 | 80 | 64 | 57 | 67 | 60 |
| Santini | 100 | 100 | 40 | 90 | — | 90 | 50 | 50 | — | 50 | 44 | 90 | 83 | 83 | 60 | 57 | 67 | 67 |
