Game Recap
The Detroit Red Wings defeated the Columbus Blue Jackets 4-3 in overtime on November 22, 2025. The Detroit Red Wings controlled play with 50.9% Corsi and generated 9.42 expected goals compared to 6.72 from the Columbus Blue Jackets at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Detroit Red Wings created 11 high-danger scoring chances compared to 8 from the Columbus Blue Jackets at 5-on-5. Emmitt Finnie was the most dangerous skater with 3.10 individual expected goals on 5 shots at 5-on-5. The Columbus Blue Jackets outshot the Detroit Red Wings 35-33 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Columbus Blue Jackets vs Detroit Red Wings progressed on Nov 22, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
CBJ3 - 4DET (OT)
Nov 22, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| DET | P1 | 20 | 24 | 45.5 | 16 | 17 | 48.5 | 11 | 11 | 50.0 | 11 | 15 | 42.3 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 | 3.52 | 2.29 | 60.5 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 20 | 29 | 40.8 | 13 | 21 | 38.2 | 9 | 13 | 40.9 | 14 | 23 | 37.8 | 5 | 6 | 45.5 | 2.73 | 4.08 | 40.1 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 22 | 22 | 50.0 | 16 | 13 | 55.2 | 11 | 10 | 52.4 | 12 | 16 | 42.9 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | 3.42 | 2.47 | 58.1 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| OT | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0.41 | 0.15 | 73.5 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 64 | 76 | 45.7 | 47 | 52 | 47.5 | 33 | 35 | 48.5 | 38 | 55 | 40.9 | 12 | 9 | 57.1 | 10.08 | 8.99 | 52.9 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | |
| CBJ | P1 | 24 | 20 | 54.5 | 17 | 16 | 51.5 | 11 | 11 | 50.0 | 15 | 11 | 57.7 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 | 2.29 | 3.52 | 39.5 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 29 | 20 | 59.2 | 21 | 13 | 61.8 | 13 | 9 | 59.1 | 23 | 14 | 62.2 | 6 | 5 | 54.5 | 4.08 | 2.73 | 59.9 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 22 | 22 | 50.0 | 13 | 16 | 44.8 | 10 | 11 | 47.6 | 16 | 12 | 57.1 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | 2.47 | 3.42 | 41.9 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| OT | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0.15 | 0.41 | 26.5 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 76 | 64 | 54.3 | 52 | 47 | 52.5 | 35 | 33 | 51.5 | 55 | 38 | 59.1 | 9 | 12 | 42.9 | 8.99 | 10.08 | 47.1 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | |
Win Probability
DET Favored
CBJ Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
DET
CBJ
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
CBJ Attempts
DET Attempts
Individual Event Map
CBJ ShootDET Shoot
Goal
Shot on Net
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Takeaway
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (DET) performed against every skater on the away team (CBJ) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = DET players, Columns = CBJ players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the DET player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| DET ↓ / CBJ → | Monahan | Fantilli | Sillinger | Coyle | Johnson | Lundeström | Gaunce | Wood | Voronkov | Marchenko | Olivier | Chinakhov | Werenski | Provorov | Mateychuk | Severson | Fabbro | Christiansen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larkin | 53 | 57 | 50 | 50 | 57 | 80 | 40 | 83 | 61 | 64 | 80 | 0 | 56 | 70 | 58 | 67 | 75 | 100 |
| Finnie | 64 | 70 | 100 | 100 | 57 | 67 | 33 | 63 | 68 | 70 | 67 | 0 | 69 | 82 | 60 | 63 | 50 | 40 |
| Copp | 54 | 22 | 21 | 26 | 58 | 20 | 0 | 70 | 22 | 20 | 31 | 33 | 18 | 18 | 29 | 21 | 75 | 54 |
| Kasper | 78 | 50 | 25 | 31 | 88 | 25 | 0 | 88 | 50 | 43 | 31 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 36 | 27 | 82 | 54 |
| Appleton | 11 | 33 | 27 | 36 | 13 | 80 | 75 | 33 | 33 | 30 | 43 | 75 | 27 | 45 | 50 | 40 | 44 | 17 |
| Danielson | 17 | 100 | 43 | 50 | 25 | 71 | 75 | 38 | 50 | 33 | 43 | 75 | 50 | 75 | 50 | 57 | 44 | 17 |
| Raymond | 67 | 61 | 50 | 40 | 57 | 67 | 40 | 80 | 63 | 67 | 80 | 0 | 60 | 69 | 50 | 56 | 50 | 67 |
| Compher | 36 | 20 | 31 | 36 | 40 | 44 | 80 | 47 | 14 | 27 | 60 | 67 | 29 | 50 | 48 | 43 | 43 | 20 |
| van Riemsdyk | 88 | 100 | 29 | 36 | 88 | 33 | 0 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 31 | 33 | 75 | 33 | 30 | 31 | 77 | 54 |
| DeBrincat | 43 | 44 | 43 | 40 | 42 | 40 | 71 | 47 | 50 | 50 | 71 | 57 | 40 | 60 | 50 | 45 | 50 | 20 |
| Kane | 45 | 56 | 46 | 40 | 44 | 40 | 71 | 47 | 60 | 60 | 71 | 57 | 47 | 62 | 50 | 48 | 63 | 25 |
| Berggren | 50 | 100 | 43 | 43 | 50 | 75 | 75 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 43 | 75 | 50 | 80 | 57 | 60 | 50 | 33 |
| Chiarot | 44 | 50 | 38 | 47 | 57 | 71 | 63 | 67 | 52 | 55 | 45 | 71 | 46 | 64 | 57 | 62 | 50 | 25 |
| Johansson | 46 | 38 | 7 | 7 | 45 | 22 | 0 | 54 | 45 | 40 | 13 | 0 | 30 | 44 | 29 | 24 | 60 | 45 |
| Seider | 41 | 57 | 31 | 36 | 57 | 57 | 83 | 77 | 54 | 59 | 50 | 80 | 62 | 79 | 45 | 40 | 75 | 75 |
| Sandin-Pellikka | 47 | 0 | 41 | 41 | 58 | 33 | 43 | 55 | — | 0 | 60 | 43 | 35 | 43 | 64 | 88 | 38 | 21 |
| Hamonic | 52 | 27 | 17 | 25 | 43 | 33 | 0 | 57 | 27 | 40 | 14 | 0 | 17 | 20 | 43 | 29 | 75 | 67 |
| Bernard-Docker | 29 | 50 | 38 | 42 | 25 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 33 | 40 | 56 | 50 | 50 | 42 | 33 | 25 | 63 | 40 |
