Vegas Golden Knights vs Utah Mammoth — November 20, 2025 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Vegas Golden Knights came away with a 4-1 victory over the Utah Mammoth on November 20, 2025. The expected goals were nearly even at 5-on-5 — UTA 7.73, VGK 7.79. Eichel put up 2 goals. VGK held a slight 11-10 edge in high-danger chances. Shots on goal: UTA 26, VGK 33.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Vegas Golden Knights vs Utah Mammoth progressed on Nov 20, 2025
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

VGK4 - 1UTA

Nov 20, 2025 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
UTA	P1	19	12	61.3	13	10	56.5	9	7	56.3	13	6	68.4	4	1	80.0	2.46	1.64	60.0	0	0	—
	P2	23	24	48.9	16	19	45.7	9	17	34.6	15	21	41.7	3	10	23.1	3.09	5.34	36.6	1	3	25.0
	P3	17	12	58.6	13	10	56.5	8	9	47.1	16	8	66.7	4	2	66.7	3.51	2.03	63.3	0	1	0.0
	Total	59	48	55.1	42	39	51.9	26	33	44.1	44	35	55.7	11	13	45.8	9.05	9.01	50.1	1	4	20.0
VGK	P1	12	19	38.7	10	13	43.5	7	9	43.8	6	13	31.6	1	4	20.0	1.64	2.46	40.0	0	0	—
	P2	24	23	51.1	19	16	54.3	17	9	65.4	21	15	58.3	10	3	76.9	5.34	3.09	63.4	3	1	75.0
	P3	12	17	41.4	10	13	43.5	9	8	52.9	8	16	33.3	2	4	33.3	2.03	3.51	36.7	1	0	100.0
	Total	48	59	44.9	39	42	48.1	33	26	55.9	35	44	44.3	13	11	54.2	9.01	9.05	49.9	4	1	80.0

Win Probability

UTA Favored

VGK Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

UTA

VGK

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

VGK Attempts

UTA Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

VGK ShootUTA Shoot

Save

Goal Against

Missed Shot Against

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (UTA) performed against every skater on the away team (VGK) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = UTA players, Columns = VGK players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the UTA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

UTA ↓ / VGK →	Eichel	Howden	Sissons	Hertl	Saad	Reinhardt	Barbashev	Marner	Bowman	Smith	Dorofeyev	Kolesar	Whitecloud	Hanifin	Theodore	Hutton	Korczak	McNabb
Cooley	44	71	25	70	87	25	50	70	50	87	54	25	70	69	50	67	67	38
Hayton	60	80	60	44	75	50	50	40	33	75	44	60	78	78	44	100	100	44
Schmaltz	44	44	67	38	75	60	50	33	50	75	33	75	62	67	33	75	75	38
McBain	50	0	50	45	0	50	67	45	33	0	38	67	50	25	43	44	40	75
Stenlund	17	40	20	0	44	0	50	0	17	29	0	50	14	14	50	29	29	50
O'Brien	25	40	20	100	44	0	67	67	25	29	67	50	17	17	40	50	50	40
Carcone	50	86	33	63	87	33	46	63	46	87	67	33	65	65	62	67	67	55
Crouse	50	0	67	30	0	67	75	30	38	0	33	67	0	0	57	44	40	80
Tanev	25	40	17	67	44	0	67	67	20	22	67	50	17	13	29	50	50	40
Guenther	59	81	57	64	84	33	50	67	50	87	67	33	68	67	67	67	67	58
Keller	60	80	60	44	75	50	50	40	33	75	38	60	80	78	44	100	100	40
Peterka	38	0	33	45	0	33	75	38	60	0	27	33	33	33	33	40	36	40
Sergachev	53	64	55	36	69	43	54	36	38	57	44	60	55	44	52	57	57	50
Cole	58	65	33	64	69	33	67	67	40	61	63	33	69	58	45	64	60	56
Simashev	45	33	13	42	33	13	40	38	36	25	36	20	44	31	33	40	40	21
Schmidt	42	57	80	56	78	75	71	50	43	75	44	83	55	60	58	64	64	65
DeSimone	56	71	25	25	76	25	57	25	57	73	20	40	69	64	44	47	44	44
Marino	30	38	50	56	67	33	40	53	20	0	46	80	50	50	44	43	43	54