Game Recap
The Minnesota Wild shut out the Anaheim Ducks 2-0 on November 15, 2025. The Minnesota Wild controlled play with 52.1% Corsi and generated 5.42 expected goals compared to 3.96 from the Anaheim Ducks at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Minnesota Wild created 9 high-danger scoring chances compared to 2 from the Anaheim Ducks at 5-on-5. Joel Eriksson Ek was the most dangerous skater with 1.38 individual expected goals on 1 shots at 5-on-5. The Minnesota Wild outshot the Anaheim Ducks 30-28 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Anaheim Ducks vs Minnesota Wild progressed on Nov 15, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
ANA0 - 2MIN
Nov 15, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| MIN | P1 | 23 | 13 | 63.9 | 15 | 10 | 60.0 | 9 | 8 | 52.9 | 17 | 6 | 73.9 | 5 | 1 | 83.3 | 3.14 | 1.50 | 67.6 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 18 | 20 | 47.4 | 15 | 18 | 45.5 | 10 | 11 | 47.6 | 11 | 13 | 45.8 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | 3.18 | 2.91 | 52.2 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 20 | 15 | 57.1 | 16 | 13 | 55.2 | 11 | 9 | 55.0 | 13 | 11 | 54.2 | 5 | 2 | 71.4 | 3.16 | 2.53 | 55.6 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 61 | 48 | 56.0 | 46 | 41 | 52.9 | 30 | 28 | 51.7 | 41 | 30 | 57.7 | 14 | 5 | 73.7 | 9.48 | 6.94 | 57.7 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| ANA | P1 | 13 | 23 | 36.1 | 10 | 15 | 40.0 | 8 | 9 | 47.1 | 6 | 17 | 26.1 | 1 | 5 | 16.7 | 1.50 | 3.14 | 32.4 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 20 | 18 | 52.6 | 18 | 15 | 54.5 | 11 | 10 | 52.4 | 13 | 11 | 54.2 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | 2.91 | 3.18 | 47.8 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 15 | 20 | 42.9 | 13 | 16 | 44.8 | 9 | 11 | 45.0 | 11 | 13 | 45.8 | 2 | 5 | 28.6 | 2.53 | 3.16 | 44.4 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 48 | 61 | 44.0 | 41 | 46 | 47.1 | 28 | 30 | 48.3 | 30 | 41 | 42.3 | 5 | 14 | 26.3 | 6.94 | 9.48 | 42.3 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
Win Probability
MIN Favored
ANA Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
MIN
ANA
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
ANA Attempts
MIN Attempts
Individual Event Map
ANA ShootMIN Shoot
Shot on Net
Hit
Hit Taken
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (MIN) performed against every skater on the away team (ANA) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = MIN players, Columns = ANA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the MIN player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| MIN ↓ / ANA → | Carlsson | Strome | McTavish | Nesterenko | Harkins | Kreider | Killorn | Gauthier | Johnston | Terry | Sennecke | Vatrano | Trouba | LaCombe | Zellweger | Helleson | Moore | Mintyukov |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eriksson Ek | 55 | 43 | 67 | 56 | 25 | 44 | 68 | 56 | 0 | 53 | 50 | 78 | 40 | 57 | 40 | 80 | 25 | 82 |
| Trenin | 25 | 56 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 14 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 25 | 60 | 50 | 33 | 44 | 25 | 63 | 100 |
| Jones | 33 | 67 | 86 | 100 | 0 | 17 | — | 100 | 75 | 100 | 17 | 83 | 67 | 33 | 60 | 33 | 71 | 100 |
| Hinostroza | 50 | 100 | 40 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 0 | 60 | 80 | 50 | 60 | 25 | 33 | 33 |
| Boldy | 48 | 50 | 67 | 64 | 25 | 37 | 70 | 42 | 0 | 46 | 55 | 75 | 43 | 53 | 50 | 77 | 25 | 77 |
| Kaprizov | 60 | 50 | 75 | 90 | 50 | 63 | 83 | 62 | 33 | 57 | 64 | 67 | 53 | 68 | 57 | 85 | 50 | 88 |
| Johansson | 63 | 63 | 43 | 50 | 33 | 45 | 53 | 69 | 0 | 63 | 63 | 67 | 67 | 65 | 50 | 69 | 14 | 33 |
| Foligno | 14 | 56 | 100 | 100 | 33 | 10 | 0 | 40 | 100 | 67 | 25 | 67 | 50 | 17 | 50 | 25 | 60 | 83 |
| Ohgren | 0 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 40 | — | 0 | 40 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 0 |
| Zuccarello | 67 | 57 | 67 | 90 | 60 | 100 | 91 | 55 | 33 | 58 | 67 | 73 | 62 | 60 | 62 | 83 | 57 | 88 |
| Hartman | 100 | 60 | 62 | 100 | 57 | 75 | 63 | 63 | 33 | 75 | 67 | 58 | 71 | 80 | 57 | 60 | 45 | 67 |
| Yurov | 33 | 33 | 0 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 60 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 60 | 60 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 |
| Brodin | 38 | 50 | 85 | 67 | 25 | 29 | 45 | 64 | 60 | 64 | 44 | 55 | 50 | 50 | 46 | 45 | 35 | 67 |
| Faber | 42 | 75 | 75 | 80 | 33 | 33 | 64 | 67 | 60 | 71 | 50 | 78 | 71 | 63 | 45 | 46 | 46 | 73 |
| Buium | 67 | 80 | 0 | 83 | 50 | 100 | 91 | — | 20 | 55 | 100 | 69 | 50 | 62 | 67 | 83 | 71 | 79 |
| Middleton | 43 | 40 | 58 | 60 | 50 | 33 | 33 | 41 | — | 56 | 42 | 50 | 50 | 38 | 47 | 50 | 33 | 100 |
| Spurgeon | 50 | 33 | 67 | 71 | 25 | 44 | 36 | 50 | — | 56 | 58 | 40 | 56 | 50 | 62 | 63 | 33 | 75 |
| Hunt | — | 80 | 0 | 80 | 40 | 100 | 50 | — | 20 | 100 | 50 | 38 | 25 | — | 50 | 0 | 63 | 60 |
