Game Recap
The Nashville Predators defeated the Pittsburgh Penguins 2-1 in overtime on November 14, 2025. The Nashville Predators controlled play with 63.4% Corsi and generated 9.68 expected goals compared to 5.45 from the Pittsburgh Penguins at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Nashville Predators created 12 high-danger scoring chances compared to 6 from the Pittsburgh Penguins at 5-on-5. Bryan Rust was the most dangerous skater with 1.85 individual expected goals on 4 shots at 5-on-5. The Nashville Predators outshot the Pittsburgh Penguins 30-17 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Pittsburgh Penguins vs Nashville Predators progressed on Nov 14, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
PIT1 - 2NSH (OT)
Nov 14, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| NSH | P1 | 16 | 13 | 55.2 | 12 | 10 | 54.5 | 8 | 8 | 50.0 | 10 | 10 | 50.0 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 | 2.42 | 1.65 | 59.4 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 28 | 12 | 70.0 | 19 | 7 | 73.1 | 12 | 2 | 85.7 | 22 | 10 | 68.8 | 7 | 4 | 63.6 | 5.58 | 1.64 | 77.3 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 19 | 10 | 65.5 | 14 | 8 | 63.6 | 8 | 7 | 53.3 | 12 | 6 | 66.7 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 2.51 | 2.15 | 53.9 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| OT | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.40 | 0.67 | 37.4 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 65 | 36 | 64.4 | 47 | 26 | 64.4 | 30 | 17 | 63.8 | 46 | 27 | 63.0 | 13 | 8 | 61.9 | 10.91 | 6.11 | 64.1 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| PIT | P1 | 13 | 16 | 44.8 | 10 | 12 | 45.5 | 8 | 8 | 50.0 | 10 | 10 | 50.0 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 | 1.65 | 2.42 | 40.6 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 12 | 28 | 30.0 | 7 | 19 | 26.9 | 2 | 12 | 14.3 | 10 | 22 | 31.3 | 4 | 7 | 36.4 | 1.64 | 5.58 | 22.7 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 10 | 19 | 34.5 | 8 | 14 | 36.4 | 7 | 8 | 46.7 | 6 | 12 | 33.3 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 2.15 | 2.51 | 46.1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| OT | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 0.67 | 0.40 | 62.6 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 36 | 65 | 35.6 | 26 | 47 | 35.6 | 17 | 30 | 36.2 | 27 | 46 | 37.0 | 8 | 13 | 38.1 | 6.11 | 10.91 | 35.9 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
Win Probability
NSH Favored
PIT Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
NSH
PIT
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
PIT Attempts
NSH Attempts
Individual Event Map
PIT ShootNSH Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Hit Taken
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (NSH) performed against every skater on the away team (PIT) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = NSH players, Columns = PIT players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the NSH player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| NSH ↓ / PIT → | Crosby | Kindel | Malkin | Novak | Dewar | Lizotte | Koppanen | Rust | Mantha | Koivunen | Hayes | Tomasino | Karlsson | Letang | Wotherspoon | Shea | Graves | Dumba |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O'Reilly | 59 | 58 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 83 | 62 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 68 | 65 | 64 | 38 | 100 | 100 |
| Stamkos | 50 | 100 | 80 | 86 | 78 | 75 | 57 | 75 | 73 | 67 | 63 | 63 | 44 | 85 | 45 | 73 | 100 | 100 |
| McCarron | 40 | 40 | 40 | 67 | 67 | 0 | 100 | 40 | 50 | 62 | 67 | 56 | 13 | 73 | 29 | 80 | 80 | 67 |
| Wiesblatt | 33 | 33 | 33 | 60 | 0 | 0 | — | 33 | 67 | 55 | 60 | 43 | 0 | 63 | 17 | 60 | 67 | 75 |
| Svechkov | 50 | 33 | 29 | 38 | 80 | 75 | 73 | 0 | 29 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 0 | 57 | 43 | 83 | 69 | 64 |
| Forsberg | 67 | 65 | 80 | 25 | 60 | 60 | 86 | 72 | 50 | 57 | 50 | 60 | 60 | 73 | 57 | 44 | 86 | 88 |
| Bunting | 29 | 22 | 25 | 33 | 82 | 78 | 73 | 0 | 25 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 11 | 50 | 44 | 70 | 69 | 64 |
| Haula | 75 | 80 | 73 | 85 | 0 | 50 | 33 | 83 | 83 | 86 | 83 | 75 | 71 | 85 | 50 | 60 | 100 | 100 |
| Marchessault | 57 | 40 | 75 | 80 | 75 | 71 | 63 | 57 | 70 | 86 | 83 | 86 | 67 | 71 | 60 | 65 | 100 | 100 |
| Evangelista | 56 | 54 | 80 | 40 | 50 | 67 | 75 | 62 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 62 | 65 | 58 | 43 | 100 | 100 |
| Wood | 80 | 60 | 50 | 43 | 83 | 80 | 83 | 50 | 33 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 40 | 71 | 71 | 86 | 71 | 67 |
| Hague | 33 | 40 | 57 | 63 | 100 | 100 | 83 | 33 | 60 | 77 | 75 | 67 | 22 | 57 | 50 | 65 | 91 | 89 |
| Skjei | 61 | 62 | 67 | 100 | 50 | 67 | 67 | 63 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 65 | 75 | 67 | 38 | 100 | 100 |
| Blankenburg | 36 | 29 | 54 | 46 | 67 | 67 | 63 | 22 | 50 | 80 | 75 | 75 | 36 | 42 | 38 | 47 | 75 | 75 |
| Perbix | 72 | 67 | 50 | 33 | 50 | 67 | 67 | 75 | 50 | 67 | 50 | 75 | 56 | 100 | 50 | 71 | 80 | 80 |
| Stastney | 50 | 40 | 75 | 70 | 58 | 44 | 56 | 33 | 63 | 80 | 88 | 83 | 33 | 75 | 44 | 60 | 77 | 70 |
| Wilsby | 60 | 50 | 80 | 71 | 86 | 83 | 100 | 33 | 67 | 67 | 80 | 75 | 0 | 78 | 60 | 88 | 80 | 75 |
| Barron | 100 | 100 | 67 | 83 | 67 | 67 | 71 | 100 | 83 | 62 | 58 | 55 | 29 | 100 | 36 | 75 | 83 | 83 |
