Buffalo Sabres vs Utah Mammoth — November 12, 2025 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Buffalo Sabres fell to the Utah Mammoth 5-2 on Wednesday. UTA held a slight 11-9 edge in high-danger chances. The numbers backed up the result — UTA generated 7.64 expected goals to BUF's 5.79 at 5-on-5 (60.6% Corsi). Isak Rosen found the net 2 times.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Buffalo Sabres vs Utah Mammoth progressed on Nov 12, 2025
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

BUF2 - 5UTA

Nov 12, 2025 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
UTA	P1	22	14	61.1	18	13	58.1	12	8	60.0	13	8	61.9	5	3	62.5	4.00	2.59	60.7	0	1	0.0
	P2	24	19	55.8	16	16	50.0	11	8	57.9	12	13	48.0	6	4	60.0	1.93	3.27	37.2	1	1	50.0
	P3	22	14	61.1	17	8	68.0	14	3	82.4	14	10	58.3	0	2	0.0	2.22	0.54	80.6	4	0	100.0
	Total	68	47	59.1	51	37	58.0	37	19	66.1	39	31	55.7	11	9	55.0	8.16	6.39	56.1	5	2	71.4
BUF	P1	14	22	38.9	13	18	41.9	8	12	40.0	8	13	38.1	3	5	37.5	2.59	4.00	39.3	1	0	100.0
	P2	19	24	44.2	16	16	50.0	8	11	42.1	13	12	52.0	4	6	40.0	3.27	1.93	62.8	1	1	50.0
	P3	14	22	38.9	8	17	32.0	3	14	17.6	10	14	41.7	2	0	100.0	0.54	2.22	19.4	0	4	0.0
	Total	47	68	40.9	37	51	42.0	19	37	33.9	31	39	44.3	9	11	45.0	6.39	8.16	43.9	2	5	28.6

Win Probability

UTA Favored

BUF Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

UTA

BUF

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

BUF Attempts

UTA Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

BUF ShootUTA Shoot

Missed Shot

Attempt Blocked

Hit

Hit Taken

Shot Blocked

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (UTA) performed against every skater on the away team (BUF) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = UTA players, Columns = BUF players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the UTA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

UTA ↓ / BUF →	Kozak	Thompson	Krebs	McLeod	Ostlund	Dunne	Greenway	Malenstyn	Doan	Tuch	Quinn	Rosen	Samuelsson	Byram	Power	Timmins	Kesselring	Bryson
Cooley	40	57	71	77	63	67	50	50	50	67	64	73	58	61	43	70	50	56
Schmaltz	40	57	71	77	63	67	50	50	50	67	64	73	58	61	43	70	50	56
McBain	50	38	80	58	50	100	67	100	50	41	44	67	63	69	57	100	67	75
Hayton	82	83	73	75	40	67	82	63	75	80	67	25	63	50	71	53	100	100
Stenlund	71	50	36	67	40	40	50	50	22	83	38	45	60	14	67	33	50	67
Crouse	50	43	85	70	50	100	67	100	50	47	57	71	63	79	58	100	67	75
Carcone	75	80	100	75	100	100	80	100	67	78	100	100	90	78	85	86	100	100
Tanev	71	75	36	100	43	40	0	50	17	100	43	50	57	17	78	0	50	67
Keller	40	57	71	77	63	67	50	50	50	67	64	73	58	61	43	70	50	56
Guenther	85	83	73	80	50	67	85	63	78	83	70	40	73	50	75	59	100	100
Peterka	78	29	64	100	38	70	80	70	75	44	60	56	43	67	42	65	86	86
Yamamoto	67	67	36	100	33	40	0	50	0	100	33	43	57	17	75	33	43	60
Sergachev	50	44	90	60	33	100	60	100	53	52	33	55	56	63	52	77	67	70
Marino	64	100	58	100	82	53	67	63	40	100	93	83	70	59	85	65	69	83
Schmidt	83	100	37	100	67	40	70	50	53	100	82	67	67	61	75	69	60	75
Cole	41	20	64	44	31	80	53	60	44	31	29	50	33	38	33	46	71	75
DeSimone	64	100	67	80	50	80	60	75	60	100	50	50	59	38	67	50	75	78
Simashev	43	63	100	50	67	100	44	100	50	50	33	0	40	64	63	71	40	57