Utah Mammoth vs Ottawa Senators — November 9, 2025 Game Stats

Game Recap

OTT 4, UTA 2 — the Ottawa Senators got the win on November 9, 2025. Guenther was the most dangerous skater at 5-on-5, racking up 1.48 individual expected goals on 3 shots. OTT had the better of the chances at even strength, putting up 8.76 xG against 7.12 while holding 48.9% of shot attempts.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Utah Mammoth vs Ottawa Senators progressed on Nov 9, 2025
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

UTA2 - 4OTT

Nov 9, 2025 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
OTT	P1	12	20	37.5	10	15	40.0	5	14	26.3	8	13	38.1	2	5	28.6	2.39	4.05	37.1	1	1	50.0
	P2	15	19	44.1	10	14	41.7	9	9	50.0	11	14	44.0	5	2	71.4	3.08	2.41	56.1	2	1	66.7
	P3	21	19	52.5	17	16	51.5	11	8	57.9	12	11	52.2	5	3	62.5	4.45	3.45	56.3	1	0	100.0
	Total	48	58	45.3	37	45	45.1	25	31	44.6	31	38	44.9	12	10	54.5	9.91	9.91	50.0	4	2	66.7
UTA	P1	20	12	62.5	15	10	60.0	14	5	73.7	13	8	61.9	5	2	71.4	4.05	2.39	62.9	1	1	50.0
	P2	19	15	55.9	14	10	58.3	9	9	50.0	14	11	56.0	2	5	28.6	2.41	3.08	43.9	1	2	33.3
	P3	19	21	47.5	16	17	48.5	8	11	42.1	11	12	47.8	3	5	37.5	3.45	4.45	43.7	0	1	0.0
	Total	58	48	54.7	45	37	54.9	31	25	55.4	38	31	55.1	10	12	45.5	9.91	9.91	50.0	2	4	33.3

Win Probability

OTT Favored

UTA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

OTT

UTA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

UTA Attempts

OTT Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

UTA ShootOTT Shoot

Shot on Net

Missed Shot

Hit Taken

Shot Blocked

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (OTT) performed against every skater on the away team (UTA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = OTT players, Columns = UTA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the OTT player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

OTT ↓ / UTA →	Cooley	Schmaltz	McBain	Stenlund	Hayton	Carcone	Crouse	Tanev	Keller	Peterka	Guenther	Yamamoto	Marino	Sergachev	Schmidt	Cole	DeSimone	Simashev
Greig	44	25	64	50	33	56	60	100	40	32	40	100	32	41	42	83	75	83
Pinto	48	41	43	0	100	50	40	—	42	38	50	100	38	42	50	57	71	67
Cozens	75	67	46	100	50	36	36	100	67	57	50	100	36	67	42	70	67	57
Stützle	56	60	40	20	80	25	25	20	55	67	67	20	38	50	50	50	63	50
Eller	0	0	50	42	25	50	56	36	0	14	14	38	25	45	31	38	33	57
Cousins	57	50	33	50	100	33	27	50	40	80	—	44	33	44	40	63	60	38
Zetterlund	75	50	64	67	60	60	60	50	75	67	67	67	46	80	60	63	75	78
Perron	75	63	25	25	63	33	50	14	70	40	57	33	40	83	45	42	56	67
Amadio	52	46	60	0	50	60	50	—	46	14	29	—	32	43	38	80	83	67
Batherson	71	67	40	27	57	33	33	27	60	40	50	27	37	75	47	36	56	50
Giroux	55	48	50	33	100	50	50	—	50	100	57	100	50	53	55	71	83	63
Hodgson	50	0	17	40	100	17	17	40	25	75	—	33	20	43	20	60	25	29
Spence	80	64	36	27	64	36	22	31	69	60	50	31	29	54	39	65	85	50
Sanderson	46	44	78	50	64	71	67	100	44	47	62	100	48	50	59	67	80	69
Chabot	64	41	33	30	56	36	36	29	50	33	38	38	37	39	40	64	64	44
Zub	45	35	67	0	58	75	75	—	40	41	50	100	50	44	57	60	60	60
Kleven	67	50	30	33	40	30	30	33	57	50	25	30	13	83	20	47	50	60
Jensen	33	20	38	50	0	38	43	50	33	33	0	40	11	58	14	29	17	64