Game Recap
The Philadelphia Flyers defeated the Nashville Predators 3-1 on November 6, 2025. Despite the result, the Nashville Predators held the edge in expected goals (11.04 to 6.61) at 5-on-5, indicating the Philadelphia Flyers received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The Nashville Predators created 16 high-danger scoring chances compared to 10 from the Philadelphia Flyers at 5-on-5. Luke Evangelista was the most dangerous skater with 1.84 individual expected goals on 2 shots at 5-on-5. The Philadelphia Flyers outshot the Nashville Predators 26-24 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Philadelphia Flyers vs Nashville Predators progressed on Nov 6, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
PHI3 - 1NSH
Nov 6, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| NSH | P1 | 27 | 15 | 64.3 | 21 | 9 | 70.0 | 10 | 7 | 58.8 | 15 | 8 | 65.2 | 6 | 3 | 66.7 | 6.25 | 1.82 | 77.5 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 22 | 17 | 56.4 | 16 | 13 | 55.2 | 10 | 10 | 50.0 | 19 | 12 | 61.3 | 10 | 7 | 58.8 | 4.80 | 4.03 | 54.4 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 17 | 16 | 51.5 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 4 | 9 | 30.8 | 10 | 6 | 62.5 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | 1.99 | 1.78 | 52.7 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 66 | 48 | 57.9 | 49 | 34 | 59.0 | 24 | 26 | 48.0 | 44 | 26 | 62.9 | 18 | 11 | 62.1 | 13.04 | 7.63 | 63.1 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | |
| PHI | P1 | 15 | 27 | 35.7 | 9 | 21 | 30.0 | 7 | 10 | 41.2 | 8 | 15 | 34.8 | 3 | 6 | 33.3 | 1.82 | 6.25 | 22.5 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 17 | 22 | 43.6 | 13 | 16 | 44.8 | 10 | 10 | 50.0 | 12 | 19 | 38.7 | 7 | 10 | 41.2 | 4.03 | 4.80 | 45.6 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 16 | 17 | 48.5 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 9 | 4 | 69.2 | 6 | 10 | 37.5 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | 1.78 | 1.99 | 47.3 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 48 | 66 | 42.1 | 34 | 49 | 41.0 | 26 | 24 | 52.0 | 26 | 44 | 37.1 | 11 | 18 | 37.9 | 7.63 | 13.04 | 36.9 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | |
Win Probability
NSH Favored
PHI Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
NSH
PHI
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
PHI Attempts
NSH Attempts
Individual Event Map
PHI ShootNSH Shoot
Shot on Net
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (NSH) performed against every skater on the away team (PHI) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = NSH players, Columns = PHI players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the NSH player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| NSH ↓ / PHI → | Dvorak | Couturier | Zegras | Abols | Cates | Deslauriers | Tippett | Konecny | Brink | Michkov | Hathaway | Grebenkin | Sanheim | York | Drysdale | Seeler | Juulsen | Andrae |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O'Reilly | 57 | 38 | 50 | 70 | 78 | 88 | 45 | 71 | 33 | 80 | 75 | 85 | 58 | 58 | 67 | 74 | 100 | 100 |
| Stamkos | 75 | 57 | 82 | 30 | 60 | 33 | 73 | 56 | 58 | 64 | 25 | 67 | 56 | 64 | 67 | 63 | 70 | 43 |
| McCarron | 41 | 0 | 46 | 100 | 20 | 67 | 54 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 62 | 71 | 0 | 44 |
| Jost | 33 | 0 | 42 | 100 | 0 | 67 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 58 | 50 | 0 | 44 |
| Wiesblatt | 46 | 0 | 43 | 100 | 0 | 67 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 54 | 67 | 0 | 44 |
| Svechkov | 67 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 50 | 33 | 57 | 57 | 33 | 0 | 60 | 75 | 25 | 40 | 0 | 0 |
| Forsberg | 57 | 38 | 100 | 63 | 90 | 83 | 57 | 72 | 44 | 57 | 75 | 86 | 60 | 62 | 72 | 69 | 100 | 100 |
| Haula | 60 | 15 | 47 | 17 | 67 | 17 | 47 | 88 | 15 | 13 | 17 | 100 | 52 | 50 | 18 | 64 | 33 | 25 |
| Bunting | 75 | 55 | 75 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 60 | 60 | 55 | 60 | 67 | — | 70 | 67 | 40 | 63 | 80 | 0 |
| Marchessault | 75 | 62 | 75 | 14 | 60 | 14 | 69 | 71 | 58 | 64 | 25 | 67 | 60 | 64 | 50 | 71 | 63 | 20 |
| Evangelista | 50 | 43 | 100 | 63 | 90 | 83 | 75 | 77 | 50 | 57 | 67 | 86 | 60 | 62 | 77 | 74 | 100 | 100 |
| Wood | 60 | 33 | 60 | 67 | 50 | 67 | 57 | 38 | 38 | 33 | 80 | 0 | 62 | 50 | 40 | 50 | 67 | 0 |
| Blankenburg | 67 | 47 | 71 | 33 | 86 | 50 | 62 | 68 | 54 | 64 | 25 | 85 | 55 | 72 | 59 | 59 | 89 | 83 |
| Skjei | 50 | 67 | 60 | 86 | 73 | 75 | 63 | 60 | 60 | 50 | 86 | 67 | 69 | 58 | 71 | 75 | 56 | 60 |
| Hague | 63 | 50 | 65 | 67 | 69 | 80 | 64 | 60 | 44 | 64 | 67 | 73 | 65 | 76 | 45 | 60 | 89 | 83 |
| Perbix | 47 | 80 | 50 | 100 | 25 | 88 | 56 | 17 | 38 | 50 | 100 | 25 | 55 | 54 | 61 | 80 | 56 | 60 |
| Barron | 33 | 23 | 20 | 13 | 57 | 14 | 20 | 57 | 30 | 30 | 22 | 60 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 63 | 33 | 29 |
| Stastney | 70 | 25 | 58 | 0 | 57 | 0 | 58 | 57 | 30 | 30 | 14 | 60 | 41 | 42 | 38 | 50 | 33 | 29 |
