Game Recap
The Minnesota Wild fell to the Carolina Hurricanes 4-3 on Thursday. Vladimir Tarasenko generated the most offense at even strength with 1.22 ixG on 2 shots. Matt Boldy had a 2-goal game. The numbers backed up the result — CAR generated 8.52 expected goals to MIN's 5.64 at 5-on-5 (61.6% Corsi). CAR generated 12 high-danger looks compared to just 6 from MIN.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Minnesota Wild vs Carolina Hurricanes progressed on Nov 6, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
MIN3 - 4CAR
Nov 6, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| CAR | P1 | 23 | 6 | 79.3 | 15 | 5 | 75.0 | 7 | 3 | 70.0 | 14 | 5 | 73.7 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 | 3.85 | 1.32 | 74.5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 |
| P2 | 30 | 13 | 69.8 | 24 | 10 | 70.6 | 14 | 7 | 66.7 | 19 | 10 | 65.5 | 6 | 0 | 100.0 | 4.10 | 1.81 | 69.4 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 24 | 28 | 46.2 | 19 | 20 | 48.7 | 6 | 14 | 30.0 | 16 | 15 | 51.6 | 6 | 5 | 54.5 | 4.16 | 3.62 | 53.4 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| Total | 77 | 47 | 62.1 | 58 | 35 | 62.4 | 27 | 24 | 52.9 | 49 | 30 | 62.0 | 16 | 6 | 72.7 | 12.11 | 6.75 | 64.2 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | |
| MIN | P1 | 6 | 23 | 20.7 | 5 | 15 | 25.0 | 3 | 7 | 30.0 | 5 | 14 | 26.3 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 | 1.32 | 3.85 | 25.5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 |
| P2 | 13 | 30 | 30.2 | 10 | 24 | 29.4 | 7 | 14 | 33.3 | 10 | 19 | 34.5 | 0 | 6 | 0.0 | 1.81 | 4.10 | 30.6 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 28 | 24 | 53.8 | 20 | 19 | 51.3 | 14 | 6 | 70.0 | 15 | 16 | 48.4 | 5 | 6 | 45.5 | 3.62 | 4.16 | 46.6 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| Total | 47 | 77 | 37.9 | 35 | 58 | 37.6 | 24 | 27 | 47.1 | 30 | 49 | 38.0 | 6 | 16 | 27.3 | 6.75 | 12.11 | 35.8 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | |
Win Probability
CAR Favored
MIN Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
CAR
MIN
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
MIN Attempts
CAR Attempts
Individual Event Map
MIN ShootCAR Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Hit Taken
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (CAR) performed against every skater on the away team (MIN) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = CAR players, Columns = MIN players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the CAR player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| CAR ↓ / MIN → | Rossi | Eriksson Ek | Trenin | Hinostroza | Jones | Pitlick | Kaprizov | Boldy | Foligno | Johansson | Tarasenko | Hartman | Faber | Spurgeon | Brodin | Middleton | Buium | Hunt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aho | 58 | 92 | 56 | 100 | 100 | — | 79 | 92 | 58 | 52 | 64 | 40 | 65 | 80 | 71 | 83 | 47 | 67 |
| Jarvis | 74 | 100 | 75 | 60 | 100 | — | 81 | 100 | 67 | 65 | 80 | 43 | 79 | 79 | 84 | 70 | 57 | 75 |
| Stankoven | 50 | 0 | 67 | 46 | 100 | — | 67 | 0 | 44 | 73 | 43 | 47 | 43 | 58 | 67 | 54 | 50 | 67 |
| Kotkaniemi | 0 | 50 | 75 | 50 | 88 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 63 | — | 50 | 33 | 40 | 25 | 43 | 50 | 71 | 82 |
| Staal | — | 23 | 0 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 33 | 67 | 100 | 40 | 75 | 17 | 64 | 14 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
| Martinook | 17 | 28 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 33 | 33 | 50 | 33 | 38 | 47 | 21 | 50 | 22 | 50 | 31 | 75 |
| Jankowski | 50 | 43 | 85 | 33 | 85 | 50 | 50 | 45 | 60 | — | 43 | 29 | 75 | 36 | 60 | 43 | 61 | 79 |
| Hall | 67 | 33 | 100 | 67 | — | — | 100 | 42 | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 | 44 | 72 | 44 | 65 | 50 | 100 |
| Ehlers | 89 | 50 | 60 | 53 | 100 | — | 83 | 33 | 53 | 83 | 20 | 44 | 59 | 67 | 88 | 38 | 55 | 80 |
| Nadeau | 33 | 0 | 78 | 40 | 87 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 61 | 100 | — | 25 | 0 | 70 | 0 | 78 | 72 | 81 |
| Svechnikov | 61 | 89 | 80 | 100 | 100 | — | 76 | 86 | 82 | 48 | 44 | 29 | 71 | 71 | 79 | 80 | 42 | 71 |
| Blake | 57 | 33 | 67 | 55 | 100 | — | 67 | 43 | 45 | 73 | 40 | 53 | 58 | 60 | 71 | 64 | 44 | 50 |
| Miller | 68 | 40 | 33 | 78 | 80 | 0 | 69 | 43 | 40 | 71 | 42 | 67 | 64 | 57 | 54 | 58 | 56 | 75 |
| Walker | 76 | 35 | 100 | 43 | 100 | — | 67 | 39 | 43 | 58 | 39 | 44 | 56 | 55 | 61 | 47 | 29 | 67 |
| Nikishin | 44 | 67 | 80 | 44 | 100 | — | 75 | 60 | 43 | 55 | 38 | 36 | 38 | 68 | 83 | 67 | 35 | 57 |
| Reilly | 33 | 43 | 68 | 44 | 88 | 50 | 64 | 33 | 62 | 47 | 50 | 50 | 48 | 40 | 53 | 40 | 69 | 82 |
| Nystrom | 38 | 67 | 70 | 60 | 88 | 50 | 60 | 64 | 64 | 50 | 58 | 56 | 50 | 61 | 58 | 69 | 65 | 78 |
| Chatfield | 100 | 75 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 75 | — | 100 | 100 | — | 100 | 100 | 50 | 80 | 0 | 0 |
