Game Recap
The Carolina Hurricanes shut out the New York Rangers 3-0 on November 4, 2025. The Carolina Hurricanes controlled play with 57.6% Corsi and generated 6.82 expected goals compared to 4.75 from the New York Rangers at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The New York Rangers created 7 high-danger scoring chances compared to 6 from the Carolina Hurricanes at 5-on-5. Alexis Lafrenière was the most dangerous skater with 1.19 individual expected goals on 1 shots at 5-on-5. The Carolina Hurricanes outshot the New York Rangers 32-26 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Carolina Hurricanes vs New York Rangers progressed on Nov 4, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
CAR3 - 0NYR
Nov 4, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| NYR | P1 | 20 | 30 | 40.0 | 17 | 22 | 43.6 | 15 | 13 | 53.6 | 16 | 20 | 44.4 | 5 | 4 | 55.6 | 4.42 | 3.55 | 55.5 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 22 | 23 | 48.9 | 15 | 18 | 45.5 | 10 | 13 | 43.5 | 14 | 12 | 53.8 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 3.25 | 2.52 | 56.3 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 15 | 13 | 53.6 | 7 | 9 | 43.8 | 1 | 6 | 14.3 | 9 | 7 | 56.3 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | 0.21 | 2.49 | 7.8 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 57 | 66 | 46.3 | 39 | 49 | 44.3 | 26 | 32 | 44.8 | 39 | 39 | 50.0 | 12 | 10 | 54.5 | 7.89 | 8.56 | 48.0 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | |
| CAR | P1 | 30 | 20 | 60.0 | 22 | 17 | 56.4 | 13 | 15 | 46.4 | 20 | 16 | 55.6 | 4 | 5 | 44.4 | 3.55 | 4.42 | 44.5 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 23 | 22 | 51.1 | 18 | 15 | 54.5 | 13 | 10 | 56.5 | 12 | 14 | 46.2 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 2.52 | 3.25 | 43.7 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 13 | 15 | 46.4 | 9 | 7 | 56.3 | 6 | 1 | 85.7 | 7 | 9 | 43.8 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | 2.49 | 0.21 | 92.2 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 66 | 57 | 53.7 | 49 | 39 | 55.7 | 32 | 26 | 55.2 | 39 | 39 | 50.0 | 10 | 12 | 45.5 | 8.56 | 7.89 | 52.0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 | |
Win Probability
NYR Favored
CAR Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
NYR
CAR
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
CAR Attempts
NYR Attempts
Individual Event Map
CAR ShootNYR Shoot
Shot on Net
Shot Blocked
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (NYR) performed against every skater on the away team (CAR) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = NYR players, Columns = CAR players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the NYR player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| NYR ↓ / CAR → | Jarvis | Staal | Aho | Stankoven | Kotkaniemi | Martinook | Ehlers | Nadeau | Jankowski | Hall | Svechnikov | Blake | Walker | Nikishin | Chatfield | Nystrom | Reilly | Alexis Legault |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zibanejad | 43 | 53 | 52 | 11 | 20 | 47 | 11 | 25 | 25 | 42 | 41 | 0 | 42 | 44 | 86 | 78 | 38 | 0 |
| Miller | 55 | 59 | 67 | 11 | 33 | 53 | 29 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 59 | 13 | 52 | 48 | 88 | 82 | 46 | 13 |
| Carrick | 29 | 43 | 10 | 33 | 24 | 43 | 27 | 40 | 36 | 0 | 8 | 56 | 29 | 50 | 28 | 25 | 30 | 40 |
| Laba | 50 | 40 | 50 | 38 | 18 | 40 | 36 | 33 | 33 | 57 | 50 | 57 | 63 | 75 | 25 | 27 | 44 | 40 |
| Brodzinski | 67 | 50 | 60 | 50 | 29 | 50 | 60 | 33 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 55 | 44 | 50 | 44 |
| Edstrom | 25 | 25 | 0 | 27 | 23 | 25 | 30 | 43 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 67 | 50 | 20 | 27 | 14 | 29 |
| Parssinen | 50 | 0 | 50 | 20 | 17 | 50 | 40 | 50 | 67 | — | — | 67 | 50 | 67 | 17 | 29 | 57 | 71 |
| Panarin | 53 | 56 | 71 | 33 | 20 | 50 | 50 | 40 | 25 | 67 | 67 | 0 | 55 | 55 | 87 | 83 | 30 | 0 |
| Lafrenière | 64 | 67 | 60 | 70 | 25 | 67 | 64 | 50 | 50 | 40 | 50 | 73 | 82 | 94 | 50 | 25 | 53 | 43 |
| Cuylle | 50 | 44 | 40 | 60 | 25 | 44 | 46 | 57 | 57 | 25 | 33 | 69 | 50 | 82 | 45 | 0 | 56 | 47 |
| Sheary | 86 | 75 | 67 | 20 | 20 | 80 | 40 | 30 | 44 | — | 0 | 50 | 38 | 43 | 50 | 29 | 70 | 67 |
| Raddysh | 40 | 0 | 40 | 33 | 20 | 50 | 40 | 38 | 57 | — | 0 | 67 | 33 | 67 | 33 | 33 | 60 | 75 |
| Fox | 71 | 71 | 56 | 50 | 25 | 72 | 50 | 55 | 64 | 50 | 54 | 57 | 59 | 62 | 65 | 73 | 59 | 47 |
| Gavrikov | 47 | 43 | 35 | 55 | 38 | 50 | 44 | 64 | 67 | 45 | 35 | 62 | 29 | 36 | 59 | 73 | 54 | 50 |
| Borgen | 10 | 20 | 33 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 6 | 36 | 44 | 38 | 27 | 11 | 27 | 30 | 22 | 28 | 14 | 29 |
| Soucy | 11 | 20 | 36 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 7 | 36 | 44 | 38 | 30 | 11 | 30 | 30 | 22 | 28 | 14 | 29 |
| Schneider | 40 | 25 | 45 | 67 | 14 | 25 | 58 | 17 | 14 | 33 | 20 | 75 | 33 | 58 | 75 | 0 | 40 | 30 |
| Robertson | 30 | 22 | 33 | 60 | 17 | 30 | 67 | 17 | 29 | 50 | 25 | 67 | 40 | 64 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 36 |
