Game Recap
The Utah Mammoth defeated the Buffalo Sabres 2-1 in overtime on November 4, 2025. The Utah Mammoth controlled play with 67.0% Corsi and generated 9.48 expected goals compared to 4.46 from the Buffalo Sabres at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Utah Mammoth created 16 high-danger scoring chances compared to 7 from the Buffalo Sabres at 5-on-5. Barrett Hayton was the most dangerous skater with 2.56 individual expected goals on 4 shots at 5-on-5. The Utah Mammoth outshot the Buffalo Sabres 35-18 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games
- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Utah Mammoth vs Buffalo Sabres progressed on Nov 4, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
UTA2 - 1BUF (OT)
Nov 4, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| BUF | P1 | 15 | 20 | 42.9 | 12 | 14 | 46.2 | 9 | 7 | 56.3 | 8 | 14 | 36.4 | 2 | 6 | 25.0 | 2.57 | 3.56 | 41.9 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 9 | 33 | 21.4 | 7 | 24 | 22.6 | 5 | 15 | 25.0 | 7 | 31 | 18.4 | 3 | 8 | 27.3 | 2.11 | 6.61 | 24.2 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 11 | 25 | 30.6 | 7 | 15 | 31.8 | 3 | 12 | 20.0 | 8 | 17 | 32.0 | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 0.72 | 2.27 | 23.9 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| OT | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.20 | 0.49 | 29.2 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 36 | 79 | 31.3 | 27 | 54 | 33.3 | 18 | 35 | 34.0 | 24 | 63 | 27.6 | 8 | 20 | 28.6 | 5.59 | 12.94 | 30.2 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| UTA | P1 | 20 | 15 | 57.1 | 14 | 12 | 53.8 | 7 | 9 | 43.8 | 14 | 8 | 63.6 | 6 | 2 | 75.0 | 3.56 | 2.57 | 58.1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 33 | 9 | 78.6 | 24 | 7 | 77.4 | 15 | 5 | 75.0 | 31 | 7 | 81.6 | 8 | 3 | 72.7 | 6.61 | 2.11 | 75.8 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 25 | 11 | 69.4 | 15 | 7 | 68.2 | 12 | 3 | 80.0 | 17 | 8 | 68.0 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 2.27 | 0.72 | 76.1 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| OT | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 0.49 | 0.20 | 70.8 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 79 | 36 | 68.7 | 54 | 27 | 66.7 | 35 | 18 | 66.0 | 63 | 24 | 72.4 | 20 | 8 | 71.4 | 12.94 | 5.59 | 69.8 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
Win Probability
BUF Favored
UTA Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
BUF
UTA
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
UTA Attempts
BUF Attempts
Individual Event Map
UTA ShootBUF Shoot
Save
Goal Against
Missed Shot Against
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (BUF) performed against every skater on the away team (UTA) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = BUF players, Columns = UTA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the BUF player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| BUF ↓ / UTA → | Schmaltz | Cooley | Hayton | Stenlund | McBain | Carcone | Crouse | Tanev | Keller | Guenther | Peterka | Yamamoto | Sergachev | Marino | Schmidt | Simashev | Cole | Määttä |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McLeod | 24 | 50 | 15 | 80 | 14 | 14 | 29 | 0 | 32 | 52 | 62 | 40 | 50 | 24 | 19 | 63 | 33 | — |
| Krebs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 58 | 27 | 31 | 30 | 63 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 14 | 47 | 57 |
| Thompson | 22 | 40 | 13 | 50 | 25 | 13 | 14 | 50 | 13 | 25 | 29 | 20 | 10 | 8 | 31 | 13 | 33 | 25 |
| Ostlund | 25 | 40 | 33 | 33 | 22 | 20 | 38 | 33 | 33 | 40 | 40 | 17 | 50 | 40 | 17 | 50 | 13 | 0 |
| Dunne | 0 | 0 | — | 75 | 33 | 50 | 33 | 67 | 0 | 0 | — | 75 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 60 | 75 |
| Greenway | 14 | 17 | 12 | 75 | 13 | 11 | 13 | 75 | 9 | 9 | 29 | 50 | 12 | 9 | 19 | 20 | 42 | 33 |
| Malenstyn | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 33 | 36 | 40 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 55 |
| Tuch | 28 | 39 | 22 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 50 | 36 | 42 | 44 | 50 | 47 | 23 | 15 | 56 | 50 | 67 |
| Doan | 43 | 43 | 22 | 100 | 100 | 0 | — | 100 | 42 | 46 | 38 | 33 | 64 | 18 | 23 | 62 | 50 | 25 |
| Rosen | 50 | 40 | 33 | 50 | 33 | 25 | 29 | 50 | 33 | 40 | 40 | 33 | 50 | 38 | 33 | 60 | 33 | 0 |
| Quinn | 38 | 50 | 27 | — | 33 | 25 | 20 | — | 25 | 33 | 50 | 0 | 33 | 29 | 50 | 50 | 33 | 13 |
| Dahlin | 38 | 67 | 25 | 56 | 44 | 27 | 50 | 67 | 30 | 63 | 50 | 31 | 77 | 20 | 20 | 88 | 33 | 36 |
| Timmins | 11 | 13 | 13 | 100 | 9 | 23 | 9 | 100 | 7 | 7 | 50 | 100 | 5 | 17 | 13 | 14 | 54 | 45 |
| Samuelsson | 22 | 22 | 25 | 56 | 38 | 30 | 43 | 50 | 22 | 22 | 67 | 29 | 38 | 20 | 13 | 82 | 31 | 27 |
| Byram | 45 | 35 | 20 | 73 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 57 | 44 | 33 | 35 | 50 | 41 | 31 | 31 | 43 | 50 | 100 |
| Kesselring | 14 | 41 | 11 | 33 | 50 | 25 | 50 | 33 | 30 | 44 | 29 | 36 | 44 | 25 | 22 | 33 | 33 | 0 |
| Power | 14 | 75 | 13 | 83 | 14 | 21 | 15 | 75 | 27 | 75 | 17 | 58 | 36 | 14 | 6 | 22 | 47 | 50 |
| Geertsen | — | 100 | — | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 40 | 50 | — | 0 | 50 | 33 | 100 |