Game Recap
The Detroit Red Wings defeated the San Jose Sharks 3-2 in a shootout on November 2, 2025. The Detroit Red Wings controlled play with 56.3% Corsi and generated 7.18 expected goals compared to 3.21 from the San Jose Sharks at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The San Jose Sharks created 9 high-danger scoring chances compared to 8 from the Detroit Red Wings at 5-on-5. Emmitt Finnie was the most dangerous skater with 2.31 individual expected goals on 2 shots at 5-on-5. The Detroit Red Wings outshot the San Jose Sharks 35-20 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Detroit Red Wings vs San Jose Sharks progressed on Nov 2, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
DET3 - 2SJS (SO)
Nov 2, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| SJS | P1 | 11 | 24 | 31.4 | 8 | 14 | 36.4 | 5 | 6 | 45.5 | 5 | 15 | 25.0 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | 0.52 | 2.02 | 20.5 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 18 | 21 | 46.2 | 7 | 17 | 29.2 | 4 | 14 | 22.2 | 14 | 14 | 50.0 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | 1.57 | 3.18 | 33.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 17 | 21 | 44.7 | 8 | 15 | 34.8 | 7 | 8 | 46.7 | 11 | 16 | 40.7 | 5 | 6 | 45.5 | 1.52 | 3.85 | 28.3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| OT | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 0.89 | 1.10 | 44.7 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| SO | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | 1.55 | 2.35 | 39.8 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 53 | 74 | 41.7 | 30 | 54 | 35.7 | 20 | 35 | 36.4 | 36 | 53 | 40.4 | 12 | 15 | 44.4 | 6.05 | 12.49 | 32.6 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | |
| DET | P1 | 24 | 11 | 68.6 | 14 | 8 | 63.6 | 6 | 5 | 54.5 | 15 | 5 | 75.0 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | 2.02 | 0.52 | 79.5 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 21 | 18 | 53.8 | 17 | 7 | 70.8 | 14 | 4 | 77.8 | 14 | 14 | 50.0 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | 3.18 | 1.57 | 67.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 21 | 17 | 55.3 | 15 | 8 | 65.2 | 8 | 7 | 53.3 | 16 | 11 | 59.3 | 6 | 5 | 54.5 | 3.85 | 1.52 | 71.7 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| OT | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 1.10 | 0.89 | 55.3 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| SO | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | 2.35 | 1.55 | 60.2 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 74 | 53 | 58.3 | 54 | 30 | 64.3 | 35 | 20 | 63.6 | 53 | 36 | 59.6 | 15 | 12 | 55.6 | 12.49 | 6.05 | 67.4 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | |
Win Probability
SJS Favored
DET Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
SJS
DET
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
DET Attempts
SJS Attempts
Individual Event Map
DET ShootSJS Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (SJS) performed against every skater on the away team (DET) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = SJS players, Columns = DET players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the SJS player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| SJS ↓ / DET → | Larkin | Finnie | Appleton | Kasper | Copp | Rasmussen | Raymond | Compher | van Riemsdyk | Soderblom | DeBrincat | Berggren | Johansson | Seider | Chiarot | Edvinsson | Sandin-Pellikka | Hamonic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wennberg | 33 | 33 | 27 | 6 | 50 | 60 | 33 | 64 | 10 | 67 | 17 | 35 | 41 | 35 | 55 | 35 | 28 | 43 |
| Celebrini | 46 | 43 | 45 | 25 | 100 | 60 | 38 | 60 | 50 | 63 | 33 | 50 | 47 | 57 | 31 | 50 | 25 | 38 |
| Kurashev | 50 | 47 | 33 | 13 | 44 | 75 | 46 | 50 | 0 | 67 | 11 | 33 | 54 | 40 | 33 | 33 | 40 | 46 |
| Smith | 47 | 50 | 45 | 29 | 100 | 60 | 40 | 100 | 60 | 63 | 25 | 100 | 57 | 60 | 33 | 64 | 20 | 56 |
| Toffoli | 53 | 46 | 50 | 33 | 100 | 60 | 43 | 100 | 60 | 67 | 43 | 100 | 63 | 71 | 27 | 69 | 11 | 60 |
| Dellandrea | 30 | 25 | 33 | 33 | 29 | 50 | 22 | 25 | 43 | 43 | 31 | 33 | 70 | 36 | 18 | 20 | 22 | 45 |
| Goodrow | 38 | 38 | 50 | 0 | 36 | 50 | 38 | 44 | 9 | 40 | 0 | 31 | 33 | 50 | 63 | 38 | 31 | 25 |
| Skinner | 46 | 45 | 33 | 13 | 43 | 67 | 42 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 40 | 46 | 36 | 50 | 36 | 50 | 38 |
| Graf | 33 | 31 | 44 | 43 | 50 | 67 | 29 | 25 | 75 | 75 | 27 | 40 | 70 | 40 | 25 | 29 | 29 | 56 |
| Cardwell | 45 | 29 | 56 | 38 | 60 | 67 | 33 | 50 | 75 | 75 | 50 | 40 | 71 | 46 | 43 | 27 | 33 | 55 |
| Giles | 20 | 20 | 50 | 0 | 80 | 50 | 20 | 67 | 25 | 40 | 0 | 80 | 33 | 33 | 71 | 20 | 80 | 25 |
| Orlov | 35 | 31 | 67 | 0 | 13 | 100 | 27 | 30 | 22 | 100 | 25 | 8 | 42 | 50 | 17 | 41 | 6 | 40 |
| Liljegren | 35 | 31 | 33 | 0 | 14 | 50 | 26 | 40 | 10 | 67 | 11 | 0 | 35 | 45 | 17 | 30 | 0 | 25 |
| Klingberg | 50 | 56 | 27 | 20 | 54 | 50 | 56 | 46 | 29 | 33 | 20 | 45 | 56 | 33 | 45 | 36 | 41 | 50 |
| Dickinson | 78 | 71 | 57 | 29 | 78 | 80 | 75 | 78 | 67 | 75 | 38 | 78 | 75 | 70 | 57 | 70 | 60 | 60 |
| Mukhamadullin | 40 | 50 | 14 | 17 | 100 | 70 | 40 | 80 | 71 | 63 | 29 | 100 | 47 | 67 | 60 | 50 | 50 | 44 |
| Ferraro | 20 | 0 | 50 | 33 | 25 | 63 | 20 | 40 | 43 | 63 | 36 | 25 | 100 | 31 | 25 | 17 | 25 | 100 |
| Desharnais | 0 | 0 | 38 | 33 | 33 | 50 | 0 | 33 | 33 | 50 | 22 | 50 | 71 | 33 | 50 | 20 | 33 | 33 |
