Game Recap
The Tampa Bay Lightning defeated the Utah Mammoth 4-2 on November 2, 2025. Despite the result, the Utah Mammoth held the edge in expected goals (3.90 to 3.50) at 5-on-5, indicating the Tampa Bay Lightning received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The Utah Mammoth created 3 high-danger scoring chances compared to 2 from the Tampa Bay Lightning at 5-on-5. Kailer Yamamoto was the most dangerous skater with 0.94 individual expected goals on 3 shots at 5-on-5. The Utah Mammoth outshot the Tampa Bay Lightning 27-26 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Tampa Bay Lightning vs Utah Mammoth progressed on Nov 2, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
TBL4 - 2UTA
Nov 2, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| UTA | P1 | 13 | 16 | 44.8 | 7 | 13 | 35.0 | 6 | 9 | 40.0 | 12 | 8 | 60.0 | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 2.10 | 3.36 | 38.5 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 17 | 20 | 45.9 | 15 | 15 | 50.0 | 9 | 10 | 47.4 | 10 | 9 | 52.6 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | 1.69 | 1.92 | 46.8 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 23 | 16 | 59.0 | 16 | 10 | 61.5 | 12 | 7 | 63.2 | 14 | 12 | 53.8 | 0 | 0 | — | 2.15 | 1.54 | 58.3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| Total | 53 | 52 | 50.5 | 38 | 38 | 50.0 | 27 | 26 | 50.9 | 36 | 29 | 55.4 | 6 | 6 | 50.0 | 5.94 | 6.82 | 46.5 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | |
| TBL | P1 | 16 | 13 | 55.2 | 13 | 7 | 65.0 | 9 | 6 | 60.0 | 8 | 12 | 40.0 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 3.36 | 2.10 | 61.5 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 20 | 17 | 54.1 | 15 | 15 | 50.0 | 10 | 9 | 52.6 | 9 | 10 | 47.4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | 1.92 | 1.69 | 53.2 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 16 | 23 | 41.0 | 10 | 16 | 38.5 | 7 | 12 | 36.8 | 12 | 14 | 46.2 | 0 | 0 | — | 1.54 | 2.15 | 41.7 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| Total | 52 | 53 | 49.5 | 38 | 38 | 50.0 | 26 | 27 | 49.1 | 29 | 36 | 44.6 | 6 | 6 | 50.0 | 6.82 | 5.94 | 53.5 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | |
Win Probability
UTA Favored
TBL Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
UTA
TBL
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
TBL Attempts
UTA Attempts
Individual Event Map
TBL ShootUTA Shoot
Goal
Attempt Blocked
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (UTA) performed against every skater on the away team (TBL) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = UTA players, Columns = TBL players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the UTA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| UTA ↓ / TBL → | Cirelli | Gourde | Point | Girgensons | Guentzel | Goncalves | James | Douglas | Hagel | Kucherov | Holmberg | Bjorkstrand | Cernak | McDonagh | Moser | Hedman | Lilleberg | D'Astous |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schmaltz | 44 | 61 | 0 | 62 | 43 | 20 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 40 | 55 | 33 | 65 | 65 | 29 | 18 | 63 | 50 |
| Cooley | 58 | 75 | 25 | 75 | 50 | 33 | 33 | — | 37 | 19 | 80 | 33 | 36 | 41 | 67 | 43 | 60 | 67 |
| Stenlund | 78 | 33 | 54 | 33 | 50 | 55 | 50 | 67 | 55 | 38 | 50 | 56 | 83 | 75 | 46 | 41 | 67 | 57 |
| Hayton | 43 | 54 | 0 | 54 | 40 | 40 | 50 | 33 | 50 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 62 | 64 | 17 | 18 | 71 | 67 |
| McBain | 80 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 67 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 67 | 20 | — | 50 | 80 | 33 | 60 | 70 | 44 | 50 |
| Crouse | 83 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 45 | 31 | 31 | 100 | 50 | 22 | — | 33 | 80 | 50 | 33 | 33 | 43 | 50 |
| Carcone | 78 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 54 | 46 | 100 | 75 | 50 | — | 50 | 100 | 100 | 40 | 50 | 71 | 58 |
| Tanev | 67 | 25 | 57 | 25 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 75 | 50 | 33 | 50 | 67 | 50 | 45 | 38 | 58 | 50 |
| Keller | 40 | 58 | 0 | 57 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 47 | 33 | 50 | 0 | 58 | 62 | 23 | 10 | 57 | 50 |
| Guenther | 50 | 71 | 31 | 71 | 50 | 33 | 33 | — | 37 | 19 | 80 | 33 | 39 | 43 | 60 | 33 | 60 | 50 |
| Peterka | 60 | 67 | 29 | 63 | 20 | 40 | 33 | — | 41 | 20 | 83 | 33 | 40 | 37 | 75 | 63 | 50 | 33 |
| Yamamoto | 58 | 50 | 63 | 50 | 57 | 75 | 67 | 50 | 56 | 33 | 40 | 67 | 56 | 43 | 60 | 60 | 57 | 50 |
| Sergachev | 63 | 73 | 35 | 86 | 38 | 60 | 50 | — | 46 | 25 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 48 | 80 | 50 | 62 | 43 |
| Schmidt | 69 | 56 | 57 | 43 | 58 | 88 | 78 | 60 | 78 | 25 | 50 | 88 | 80 | 63 | 44 | 46 | 75 | 80 |
| Cole | 77 | 56 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 29 | 23 | 100 | 58 | 44 | 56 | 23 | 67 | 62 | 31 | 41 | 64 | 50 |
| Marino | 44 | 40 | 0 | 42 | 17 | 58 | 78 | 50 | 33 | 0 | 50 | 78 | 64 | 54 | 27 | 22 | 43 | 63 |
| Määttä | 78 | 56 | 67 | 56 | 67 | 44 | 44 | 100 | 75 | 100 | 56 | 47 | 75 | 73 | 27 | 33 | 67 | 60 |
| Simashev | 50 | 40 | 29 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 31 | 25 | 67 | 0 | 29 | 21 | 25 | 29 | 50 | 43 |
