Game Recap
The Edmonton Oilers defeated the Chicago Blackhawks 3-2 in overtime on November 1, 2025. Despite the result, the Chicago Blackhawks held the edge in expected goals (8.26 to 5.89) at 5-on-5, indicating the Edmonton Oilers received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The Chicago Blackhawks created 12 high-danger scoring chances compared to 11 from the Edmonton Oilers at 5-on-5. Andre Burakovsky was the most dangerous skater with 2.29 individual expected goals on 5 shots at 5-on-5. The Edmonton Oilers outshot the Chicago Blackhawks 30-29 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Chicago Blackhawks vs Edmonton Oilers progressed on Nov 1, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
CHI2 - 3EDM (OT)
Nov 1, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| EDM | P1 | 27 | 17 | 61.4 | 19 | 15 | 55.9 | 13 | 6 | 68.4 | 17 | 11 | 60.7 | 4 | 5 | 44.4 | 2.87 | 3.94 | 42.1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 19 | 18 | 51.4 | 14 | 13 | 51.9 | 10 | 11 | 47.6 | 11 | 14 | 44.0 | 7 | 3 | 70.0 | 3.76 | 1.98 | 65.4 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| P3 | 13 | 21 | 38.2 | 7 | 14 | 33.3 | 4 | 11 | 26.7 | 11 | 14 | 44.0 | 3 | 7 | 30.0 | 1.51 | 3.68 | 29.1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| OT | 5 | 1 | 83.3 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 1.07 | 0.12 | 89.8 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 64 | 57 | 52.9 | 44 | 43 | 50.6 | 30 | 29 | 50.8 | 43 | 40 | 51.8 | 15 | 15 | 50.0 | 9.21 | 9.73 | 48.6 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | |
| CHI | P1 | 17 | 27 | 38.6 | 15 | 19 | 44.1 | 6 | 13 | 31.6 | 11 | 17 | 39.3 | 5 | 4 | 55.6 | 3.94 | 2.87 | 57.9 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 18 | 19 | 48.6 | 13 | 14 | 48.1 | 11 | 10 | 52.4 | 14 | 11 | 56.0 | 3 | 7 | 30.0 | 1.98 | 3.76 | 34.6 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| P3 | 21 | 13 | 61.8 | 14 | 7 | 66.7 | 11 | 4 | 73.3 | 14 | 11 | 56.0 | 7 | 3 | 70.0 | 3.68 | 1.51 | 70.9 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| OT | 1 | 5 | 16.7 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.12 | 1.07 | 10.2 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 57 | 64 | 47.1 | 43 | 44 | 49.4 | 29 | 30 | 49.2 | 40 | 43 | 48.2 | 15 | 15 | 50.0 | 9.73 | 9.21 | 51.4 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | |
Win Probability
EDM Favored
CHI Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
EDM
CHI
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
CHI Attempts
EDM Attempts
Individual Event Map
CHI ShootEDM Shoot
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (EDM) performed against every skater on the away team (CHI) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = EDM players, Columns = CHI players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the EDM player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| EDM ↓ / CHI → | Bedard | Nazar | Teravainen | Greene | Donato | Dach | Burakovsky | Bertuzzi | Foligno | Slaggert | Mikheyev | Vlasic | Kaiser | Levshunov | Crevier | Rinzel | Murphy | Grzelcyk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDavid | 56 | 38 | 38 | 38 | 69 | 100 | 26 | 36 | 67 | 100 | 65 | 52 | 25 | 38 | 57 | 41 | 80 | 67 |
| Roslovic | 65 | 61 | 63 | 76 | 42 | 33 | 65 | 63 | 45 | 25 | 54 | 71 | 48 | 62 | 44 | 58 | 90 | 75 |
| Draisaitl | 63 | 77 | 83 | 75 | 50 | 33 | 75 | 71 | 45 | 25 | 60 | 69 | 56 | 90 | 44 | 58 | 90 | 75 |
| Nugent-Hopkins | 47 | 43 | 42 | 46 | 33 | 40 | 29 | 31 | 62 | 100 | 46 | 47 | 27 | 67 | 50 | 24 | 89 | 60 |
| Frederic | 25 | 50 | 50 | 25 | 80 | 100 | 25 | 50 | 67 | 100 | 75 | 67 | 50 | 23 | 100 | 50 | 25 | 35 |
| Henrique | 41 | 50 | 78 | 40 | 50 | 100 | 38 | 50 | 86 | 100 | 0 | 86 | 71 | 38 | 100 | 20 | 71 | 29 |
| Savoie | 33 | 50 | 75 | 30 | 80 | 100 | 27 | 50 | 83 | 100 | 75 | 100 | 60 | 20 | 100 | 80 | 57 | 43 |
| Lazar | 25 | 75 | 67 | 25 | 100 | 100 | 25 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 67 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 67 |
| Philp | 0 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 67 | 50 | — | 0 | 100 | 33 |
| Mangiapane | 57 | 25 | 31 | 55 | 44 | 100 | 29 | 31 | 55 | 100 | 50 | 44 | 36 | 75 | 50 | 27 | 75 | 50 |
| Howard | 33 | 17 | 38 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 60 | 33 | 38 | — | 0 | 100 | 75 |
| Podkolzin | 73 | 40 | 57 | 81 | 56 | 50 | 73 | 40 | 33 | 25 | 60 | 75 | 60 | 82 | 14 | 64 | 80 | 50 |
| Bouchard | 65 | 41 | 44 | 59 | 68 | 100 | 50 | 25 | 55 | 100 | 65 | 54 | 42 | 40 | 47 | 75 | 82 | 89 |
| Nurse | 29 | 33 | 31 | 43 | 38 | 40 | 24 | 40 | 58 | 67 | 60 | 44 | 41 | 71 | 45 | 6 | 75 | 20 |
| Walman | 44 | 29 | 42 | 43 | 60 | 57 | 28 | 40 | 67 | 67 | 60 | 58 | 47 | 69 | 50 | 6 | 88 | 20 |
| Ekholm | 55 | 22 | 46 | 64 | 55 | 40 | 44 | 33 | 55 | 100 | 67 | 52 | 35 | 33 | 38 | 67 | 75 | 88 |
| Kulak | 36 | 75 | 86 | 38 | 33 | 100 | 36 | 75 | 50 | 100 | 33 | 60 | 86 | 36 | 71 | 50 | 50 | 38 |
| Emberson | 40 | 60 | 67 | 43 | 50 | 100 | 40 | 60 | 60 | 100 | 33 | 71 | 67 | 31 | 75 | 50 | 60 | 38 |
