Game Recap
WPG 5, PIT 2 — the Winnipeg Jets got the win on November 1, 2025. High-danger chances favored WPG by a wide margin: 18 to 13. A close game in the analytics too — WPG and PIT were nearly dead even in expected goals at 5-on-5 (9.42 vs 9.31). Kyle Connor had a 2-goal game. WPG outshot PIT 34-30.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Pittsburgh Penguins vs Winnipeg Jets progressed on Nov 1, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
PIT2 - 5WPG
Nov 1, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| WPG | P1 | 18 | 21 | 46.2 | 12 | 13 | 48.0 | 8 | 11 | 42.1 | 13 | 14 | 48.1 | 6 | 5 | 54.5 | 1.90 | 2.92 | 39.5 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 23 | 16 | 59.0 | 17 | 12 | 58.6 | 12 | 11 | 52.2 | 17 | 12 | 58.6 | 7 | 3 | 70.0 | 4.50 | 2.52 | 64.1 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| P3 | 22 | 23 | 48.9 | 18 | 19 | 48.6 | 14 | 8 | 63.6 | 16 | 16 | 50.0 | 7 | 7 | 50.0 | 4.16 | 4.98 | 45.5 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| Total | 63 | 60 | 51.2 | 47 | 44 | 51.6 | 34 | 30 | 53.1 | 46 | 42 | 52.3 | 20 | 15 | 57.1 | 10.56 | 10.42 | 50.3 | 5 | 2 | 71.4 | |
| PIT | P1 | 21 | 18 | 53.8 | 13 | 12 | 52.0 | 11 | 8 | 57.9 | 14 | 13 | 51.9 | 5 | 6 | 45.5 | 2.92 | 1.90 | 60.5 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 16 | 23 | 41.0 | 12 | 17 | 41.4 | 11 | 12 | 47.8 | 12 | 17 | 41.4 | 3 | 7 | 30.0 | 2.52 | 4.50 | 35.9 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| P3 | 23 | 22 | 51.1 | 19 | 18 | 51.4 | 8 | 14 | 36.4 | 16 | 16 | 50.0 | 7 | 7 | 50.0 | 4.98 | 4.16 | 54.5 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| Total | 60 | 63 | 48.8 | 44 | 47 | 48.4 | 30 | 34 | 46.9 | 42 | 46 | 47.7 | 15 | 20 | 42.9 | 10.42 | 10.56 | 49.7 | 2 | 5 | 28.6 | |
Win Probability
WPG Favored
PIT Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
WPG
PIT
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
PIT Attempts
WPG Attempts
Individual Event Map
PIT ShootWPG Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Attempt Blocked
Shot Blocked
Takeaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (WPG) performed against every skater on the away team (PIT) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = WPG players, Columns = PIT players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the WPG player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| WPG ↓ / PIT → | Crosby | Malkin | Hallander | Kindel | Dewar | Lizotte | Acciari | Novak | Rust | Tomasino | Mantha | Koivunen | Karlsson | Wotherspoon | Letang | Shea | Brunicke | Pickering |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scheifele | 71 | 56 | 71 | 50 | 88 | 69 | 67 | 67 | 72 | 61 | 61 | 0 | 69 | 67 | 63 | 50 | 60 | 80 |
| Vilardi | 75 | 59 | 71 | 50 | 88 | 60 | 67 | 67 | 76 | 53 | 53 | 0 | 68 | 70 | 56 | 50 | 60 | 80 |
| Namestnikov | 60 | 50 | 50 | 38 | 57 | 70 | 65 | 100 | 78 | 67 | 67 | 75 | 80 | 55 | 75 | 70 | 53 | 60 |
| Toews | 43 | 55 | 20 | 38 | 58 | 71 | 69 | 100 | 67 | 67 | 64 | 67 | 80 | 54 | 75 | 74 | 47 | 60 |
| Ford | 25 | 31 | 30 | 19 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 22 | 27 | 38 | 38 | 7 | 29 | 27 | 22 | 17 | 36 | 33 |
| Lambert | 42 | 40 | 42 | 31 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 22 | 33 | 60 | 50 | 8 | 47 | 27 | 22 | 33 | 38 | 30 |
| Barron | 40 | 67 | 45 | 71 | 67 | 50 | 50 | 83 | 20 | 100 | 80 | 50 | 53 | 33 | 57 | 64 | 67 | 67 |
| Connor | 71 | 61 | 60 | 50 | 89 | 62 | 50 | 75 | 72 | 61 | 61 | 33 | 71 | 70 | 57 | 43 | 60 | 67 |
| Iafallo | 60 | 55 | 33 | 38 | 67 | 86 | 55 | 100 | 67 | 73 | 71 | 67 | 86 | 56 | 81 | 69 | 53 | 60 |
| Koepke | 40 | 38 | 50 | 32 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 22 | 27 | 67 | 57 | 8 | 44 | 33 | 25 | 38 | 44 | 33 |
| Pearson | 18 | 80 | 11 | 50 | 71 | 60 | 80 | 83 | 47 | 63 | 57 | 33 | 55 | 50 | 71 | 60 | 33 | 100 |
| Niederreiter | 18 | 67 | 0 | 50 | 71 | 60 | 80 | 80 | 47 | 63 | 50 | 20 | 50 | 47 | 83 | 64 | 33 | 100 |
| Stanley | 50 | 67 | 36 | 80 | 89 | 88 | 83 | 100 | 52 | 77 | 73 | 67 | 73 | 52 | 84 | 57 | 63 | 86 |
| Morrissey | 55 | 33 | 50 | 9 | 63 | 64 | 36 | 50 | 60 | 38 | 38 | 10 | 63 | 52 | 41 | 40 | 30 | 30 |
| Pionk | 53 | 64 | 44 | 50 | 88 | 86 | 89 | 100 | 63 | 76 | 74 | 100 | 69 | 67 | 81 | 68 | 77 | 100 |
| DeMelo | 52 | 42 | 50 | 23 | 45 | 43 | 36 | 40 | 53 | 55 | 50 | 0 | 67 | 45 | 41 | 50 | 23 | 27 |
| Fleury | 36 | 22 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 29 | 50 | 33 | 13 | 38 | 38 | 18 | 27 | 14 | 30 | 42 | 36 | 50 |
| Miller | 17 | 38 | 0 | 31 | 57 | 38 | 60 | 33 | 17 | 44 | 38 | 18 | 18 | 14 | 42 | 31 | 36 | 60 |
