Nashville Predators vs Philadelphia Flyers — October 30, 2025 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Philadelphia Flyers came away with a 4-1 victory over the Nashville Predators on October 30, 2025. NSH generated 11 high-danger looks compared to just 4 from PHI. Zegras put up 2 goals. PHI got the two points, but NSH held a 6.92-5.18 expected goals edge at even strength.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Nashville Predators vs Philadelphia Flyers progressed on Oct 30, 2025
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

NSH1 - 4PHI

Oct 30, 2025 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
PHI	P1	14	23	37.8	8	16	33.3	3	10	23.1	10	17	37.0	2	6	25.0	1.43	4.17	25.5	0	0	—
	P2	16	29	35.6	12	18	40.0	8	14	36.4	11	20	35.5	2	4	33.3	2.59	2.34	52.6	2	1	66.7
	P3	12	20	37.5	9	13	40.9	7	9	43.8	7	15	31.8	0	5	0.0	1.37	3.01	31.3	2	0	100.0
	Total	42	72	36.8	29	47	38.2	18	33	35.3	28	52	35.0	4	15	21.1	5.39	9.51	36.2	4	1	80.0
NSH	P1	23	14	62.2	16	8	66.7	10	3	76.9	17	10	63.0	6	2	75.0	4.17	1.43	74.5	0	0	—
	P2	29	16	64.4	18	12	60.0	14	8	63.6	20	11	64.5	4	2	66.7	2.34	2.59	47.4	1	2	33.3
	P3	20	12	62.5	13	9	59.1	9	7	56.3	15	7	68.2	5	0	100.0	3.01	1.37	68.7	0	2	0.0
	Total	72	42	63.2	47	29	61.8	33	18	64.7	52	28	65.0	15	4	78.9	9.51	5.39	63.8	1	4	20.0

Win Probability

PHI Favored

NSH Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

PHI

NSH

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

NSH Attempts

PHI Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

NSH ShootPHI Shoot

Hit

Hit Taken

Shot Blocked

Giveaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (PHI) performed against every skater on the away team (NSH) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = PHI players, Columns = NSH players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the PHI player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

PHI ↓ / NSH →	O'Reilly	Svechkov	Stamkos	Wiesblatt	McCarron	Forsberg	Bunting	Haula	Evangelista	Marchessault	Wood	Smith	Blankenburg	Skjei	Hague	Perbix	Barron	Stastney
Zegras	57	50	60	63	63	50	71	67	57	60	62	50	53	63	53	67	57	67
Abols	0	38	33	38	43	0	67	33	0	29	50	40	67	50	67	33	15	18
Dvorak	33	64	40	67	0	33	31	11	29	29	27	—	63	27	50	33	44	33
Couturier	20	100	0	—	—	20	75	—	29	0	100	—	33	33	50	43	100	100
Cates	47	14	33	33	100	40	29	25	42	36	29	33	28	53	25	53	38	29
Deslauriers	—	50	—	50	57	—	100	100	—	—	67	57	75	100	75	100	25	40
Foerster	47	25	20	0	100	40	33	20	44	29	33	25	26	53	25	50	25	14
Brink	41	33	30	25	100	38	36	24	38	33	33	25	28	43	25	43	44	33
Konecny	36	42	25	33	25	30	67	100	43	27	80	50	42	56	50	83	18	22
Tippett	42	50	14	40	25	36	69	50	40	29	62	33	53	50	57	55	25	25
Michkov	67	67	75	63	50	67	58	38	67	67	46	38	63	57	57	50	67	33
Hathaway	0	50	67	50	40	0	14	14	0	0	17	40	63	13	50	50	27	13
Sanheim	38	33	36	50	67	31	24	24	27	40	25	60	43	30	44	35	33	38
York	31	11	27	33	67	24	19	24	27	23	20	43	37	21	40	29	25	29
Drysdale	50	45	33	33	40	50	55	36	67	27	56	31	50	67	47	56	25	20
Seeler	38	33	19	40	43	36	44	30	63	13	50	38	48	45	50	71	14	14
Andrae	50	80	50	80	67	50	89	50	50	60	67	50	56	70	33	83	73	75
Juulsen	20	82	38	60	33	33	88	40	33	43	67	25	36	60	29	86	63	75