Game Recap
LAK 4, SJS 3 — the Los Angeles Kings got the win on October 28, 2025. SJS had a big edge in high-danger chances, 14-5 over LAK at 5-on-5. Dig into the 5-on-5 data, and SJS had the better of it (7.97 xG to 3.47). Sometimes the bounces just don't go your way. Michael Misa generated the most offense at even strength with 2.67 ixG on 4 shots. SJS peppered the net with 40 shots to LAK's 14.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Los Angeles Kings vs San Jose Sharks progressed on Oct 28, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
LAK4 - 3SJS
Oct 28, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| SJS | P1 | 15 | 16 | 48.4 | 9 | 12 | 42.9 | 7 | 6 | 53.8 | 13 | 8 | 61.9 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 1.95 | 2.51 | 43.7 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 30 | 6 | 83.3 | 21 | 5 | 80.8 | 16 | 4 | 80.0 | 20 | 4 | 83.3 | 10 | 1 | 90.9 | 5.71 | 1.15 | 83.2 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 34 | 12 | 73.9 | 24 | 5 | 82.8 | 17 | 4 | 81.0 | 26 | 7 | 78.8 | 11 | 2 | 84.6 | 6.83 | 0.83 | 89.1 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| Total | 79 | 34 | 69.9 | 54 | 22 | 71.1 | 40 | 14 | 74.1 | 59 | 19 | 75.6 | 24 | 6 | 80.0 | 14.48 | 4.50 | 76.3 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | |
| LAK | P1 | 16 | 15 | 51.6 | 12 | 9 | 57.1 | 6 | 7 | 46.2 | 8 | 13 | 38.1 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 2.51 | 1.95 | 56.3 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 6 | 30 | 16.7 | 5 | 21 | 19.2 | 4 | 16 | 20.0 | 4 | 20 | 16.7 | 1 | 10 | 9.1 | 1.15 | 5.71 | 16.8 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 12 | 34 | 26.1 | 5 | 24 | 17.2 | 4 | 17 | 19.0 | 7 | 26 | 21.2 | 2 | 11 | 15.4 | 0.83 | 6.83 | 10.9 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| Total | 34 | 79 | 30.1 | 22 | 54 | 28.9 | 14 | 40 | 25.9 | 19 | 59 | 24.4 | 6 | 24 | 20.0 | 4.50 | 14.48 | 23.7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | |
Win Probability
SJS Favored
LAK Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
SJS
LAK
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
LAK Attempts
SJS Attempts
Individual Event Map
LAK ShootSJS Shoot
Shot on Net
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (SJS) performed against every skater on the away team (LAK) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = SJS players, Columns = LAK players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the SJS player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| SJS ↓ / LAK → | Kopitar | Danault | Turcotte | Moore | Fiala | Kuzmenko | Malott | Kempe | Byfield | Laferriere | Armia | Perry | Dumoulin | Doughty | Ceci | Edmundson | Anderson | Clarke |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wennberg | 83 | 83 | 50 | 91 | 86 | 64 | 50 | 64 | 60 | 100 | 90 | 0 | 95 | 85 | 79 | 69 | 75 | 75 |
| Celebrini | 90 | 75 | 50 | 56 | 70 | 75 | 67 | 74 | 75 | 80 | 94 | 50 | 86 | 73 | 80 | 94 | 75 | 55 |
| Smith | 90 | 75 | 100 | 71 | 67 | 75 | 100 | 82 | 74 | 79 | 94 | 60 | 90 | 79 | 87 | 93 | 83 | 50 |
| Kurashev | 86 | 83 | 50 | 73 | 90 | 71 | 100 | 60 | 50 | 100 | 75 | 17 | 85 | 100 | 70 | 73 | 72 | 67 |
| Toffoli | 82 | 75 | 100 | 80 | 80 | 50 | 100 | 76 | 85 | 86 | 94 | 50 | 95 | 83 | 82 | 93 | 76 | 57 |
| Goodrow | 60 | 67 | 43 | 67 | 83 | 40 | 40 | 45 | 20 | 67 | 67 | 25 | 56 | 55 | 100 | 44 | 100 | 33 |
| Dellandrea | 67 | 40 | 33 | 50 | 83 | 33 | 40 | 63 | 25 | 50 | 50 | 11 | 56 | 55 | 50 | 50 | 75 | 27 |
| Misa | 100 | 60 | 40 | 69 | 0 | 100 | 50 | 100 | — | 100 | 50 | 33 | 69 | 62 | 100 | 75 | 100 | 33 |
| Eklund | 84 | 75 | 33 | 63 | 89 | 57 | 100 | 65 | 68 | 100 | 93 | 17 | 91 | 100 | 71 | 79 | 71 | 60 |
| Skinner | 100 | 60 | 25 | 71 | 40 | 100 | 33 | 100 | 50 | 78 | 50 | 0 | 67 | 57 | 100 | 71 | 100 | 20 |
| Graf | 60 | 40 | 20 | 45 | 60 | 60 | 25 | 50 | 40 | 25 | 44 | 0 | 45 | 44 | 50 | 57 | 67 | 14 |
| Reaves | 67 | 67 | 25 | 67 | 100 | 20 | 33 | 57 | 50 | 100 | 67 | 25 | 63 | 63 | 100 | 40 | 100 | 33 |
| Klingberg | 94 | 50 | 0 | 54 | 71 | 25 | 0 | 67 | 57 | 83 | 77 | 0 | 71 | 61 | 74 | 71 | 82 | 27 |
| Ferraro | 50 | 44 | 43 | 44 | 58 | 20 | 50 | 36 | 27 | 67 | 44 | 23 | 56 | 56 | 43 | 33 | 67 | 31 |
| Orlov | 78 | 75 | 50 | 76 | 100 | 73 | 100 | 65 | 57 | 77 | 80 | 25 | 83 | 64 | 76 | 100 | 71 | 40 |
| Liljegren | 76 | 75 | 33 | 50 | 92 | 60 | 100 | 60 | 57 | 75 | 80 | 25 | 82 | 79 | 65 | 60 | 67 | 33 |
| Desharnais | 33 | 75 | 57 | 60 | 29 | 43 | 60 | 33 | 33 | 67 | 75 | 67 | 67 | 67 | 80 | 60 | 80 | 50 |
| Dickinson | 100 | 57 | 60 | 67 | 83 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 83 | 73 | 75 | 33 | 78 | 67 | 75 | 83 | 80 | 56 |
