Utah Mammoth vs Edmonton Oilers — October 28, 2025 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Edmonton Oilers defeated the Utah Mammoth 6-3 on October 28, 2025. The Edmonton Oilers controlled play with 50.5% Corsi and generated 7.64 expected goals compared to 6.93 from the Utah Mammoth at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Utah Mammoth created 12 high-danger scoring chances compared to 8 from the Edmonton Oilers at 5-on-5. Connor McDavid scored 2 goals. Lawson Crouse was the most dangerous skater with 1.47 individual expected goals on 3 shots at 5-on-5. The Edmonton Oilers outshot the Utah Mammoth 24-23 in total shots on goal.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Utah Mammoth vs Edmonton Oilers progressed on Oct 28, 2025
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

UTA3 - 6EDM

Oct 28, 2025 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
EDM	P1	12	21	36.4	8	15	34.8	3	9	25.0	8	15	34.8	4	5	44.4	2.14	3.82	35.9	0	2	0.0
	P2	26	13	66.7	18	8	69.2	15	5	75.0	17	10	63.0	3	4	42.9	4.19	1.61	72.2	5	1	83.3
	P3	13	19	40.6	10	15	40.0	6	9	40.0	8	12	40.0	2	7	22.2	1.62	3.51	31.5	1	0	100.0
	Total	51	53	49.0	36	38	48.6	24	23	51.1	33	37	47.1	9	16	36.0	7.95	8.94	47.1	6	3	66.7
UTA	P1	21	12	63.6	15	8	65.2	9	3	75.0	15	8	65.2	5	4	55.6	3.82	2.14	64.1	2	0	100.0
	P2	13	26	33.3	8	18	30.8	5	15	25.0	10	17	37.0	4	3	57.1	1.61	4.19	27.8	1	5	16.7
	P3	19	13	59.4	15	10	60.0	9	6	60.0	12	8	60.0	7	2	77.8	3.51	1.62	68.5	0	1	0.0
	Total	53	51	51.0	38	36	51.4	23	24	48.9	37	33	52.9	16	9	64.0	8.94	7.95	52.9	3	6	33.3

Win Probability

EDM Favored

UTA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

EDM

UTA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

UTA Attempts

EDM Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

UTA ShootEDM Shoot

Attempt Blocked

Hit Taken

Shot Blocked

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (EDM) performed against every skater on the away team (UTA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = EDM players, Columns = UTA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the EDM player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

EDM ↓ / UTA →	Schmaltz	Hayton	McBain	Stenlund	Cooley	O'Brien	Crouse	Carcone	Tanev	Keller	Peterka	Guenther	Sergachev	Schmidt	Simashev	Marino	Cole	Määttä
Draisaitl	62	33	78	67	42	75	55	50	78	44	38	42	45	50	53	73	86	83
McDavid	52	39	93	69	70	67	75	88	67	44	54	70	62	63	69	79	71	67
Roslovic	78	71	33	64	45	56	33	43	60	67	50	45	47	57	57	64	40	67
Nugent-Hopkins	50	47	83	86	55	67	80	75	67	40	60	55	55	73	57	75	58	50
Savoie	25	50	56	70	36	67	60	56	67	25	57	36	54	62	63	65	25	50
Henrique	38	50	45	75	44	71	50	45	71	38	67	44	62	58	63	57	25	50
Frederic	80	67	46	33	44	33	42	46	33	75	44	44	45	56	75	55	10	56
Mangiapane	29	33	86	75	75	75	86	75	75	31	75	75	53	62	69	64	50	0
Howard	25	0	30	67	60	71	36	30	71	25	60	60	40	60	44	55	33	25
Podkolzin	71	60	33	64	45	56	33	33	60	60	50	45	38	57	57	64	33	83
Tomasek	80	50	53	60	33	33	50	33	33	67	33	33	33	55	33	60	50	40
Ekholm	47	33	73	75	56	60	75	63	67	38	56	56	56	70	58	67	40	50
Walman	44	36	57	65	62	78	47	50	78	38	53	62	53	59	62	67	53	50
Bouchard	50	38	88	64	57	56	86	67	56	40	57	57	50	58	53	65	80	50
Nurse	54	30	75	47	39	29	50	60	44	44	35	39	37	39	38	53	54	71
Kulak	38	75	42	100	30	100	42	42	100	38	50	30	33	56	75	62	20	50
Emberson	33	100	64	100	17	100	64	64	100	33	50	17	53	75	83	86	0	86
Stecher	40	40	14	67	50	67	14	25	60	25	56	50	22	50	44	55	38	50