Game Recap
DET 4, EDM 2 — the Detroit Red Wings got the win on October 19, 2025. Dylan Larkin had a 2-goal game. A close game in the analytics too — DET and EDM were nearly dead even in expected goals at 5-on-5 (6.71 vs 6.67). Emmitt Finnie had a 2-goal game. Shots on goal: DET 25, EDM 18.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Edmonton Oilers vs Detroit Red Wings progressed on Oct 19, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
EDM2 - 4DET
Oct 19, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| DET | P1 | 25 | 9 | 73.5 | 12 | 6 | 66.7 | 7 | 3 | 70.0 | 20 | 6 | 76.9 | 9 | 0 | 100.0 | 2.61 | 0.58 | 81.8 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 20 | 18 | 52.6 | 16 | 13 | 55.2 | 10 | 8 | 55.6 | 11 | 15 | 42.3 | 2 | 6 | 25.0 | 2.59 | 3.91 | 39.8 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | |
| P3 | 16 | 17 | 48.5 | 11 | 12 | 47.8 | 8 | 7 | 53.3 | 14 | 11 | 56.0 | 4 | 6 | 40.0 | 1.51 | 2.45 | 38.2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| Total | 61 | 44 | 58.1 | 39 | 31 | 55.7 | 25 | 18 | 58.1 | 45 | 32 | 58.4 | 15 | 12 | 55.6 | 6.72 | 6.94 | 49.2 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | |
| EDM | P1 | 9 | 25 | 26.5 | 6 | 12 | 33.3 | 3 | 7 | 30.0 | 6 | 20 | 23.1 | 0 | 9 | 0.0 | 0.58 | 2.61 | 18.2 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 18 | 20 | 47.4 | 13 | 16 | 44.8 | 8 | 10 | 44.4 | 15 | 11 | 57.7 | 6 | 2 | 75.0 | 3.91 | 2.59 | 60.2 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | |
| P3 | 17 | 16 | 51.5 | 12 | 11 | 52.2 | 7 | 8 | 46.7 | 11 | 14 | 44.0 | 6 | 4 | 60.0 | 2.45 | 1.51 | 61.8 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| Total | 44 | 61 | 41.9 | 31 | 39 | 44.3 | 18 | 25 | 41.9 | 32 | 45 | 41.6 | 12 | 15 | 44.4 | 6.94 | 6.72 | 50.8 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | |
Win Probability
DET Favored
EDM Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
DET
EDM
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
EDM Attempts
DET Attempts
Individual Event Map
EDM ShootDET Shoot
Shot on Net
Hit
Shot Blocked
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (DET) performed against every skater on the away team (EDM) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = DET players, Columns = EDM players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the DET player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| DET ↓ / EDM → | McDavid | Draisaitl | Roslovic | Savoie | Nugent-Hopkins | Philp | Henrique | Frederic | Mangiapane | Howard | Podkolzin | Kapanen | Nurse | Kulak | Emberson | Bouchard | Ekholm | Stecher |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kasper | 50 | 57 | 55 | 63 | 65 | 69 | 50 | 100 | 42 | 20 | 67 | 100 | 70 | 60 | 50 | 50 | 83 | 77 |
| Finnie | 62 | 58 | 67 | — | 50 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 100 | 50 | — | 78 | 75 | 80 | 58 | 63 | 50 |
| Larkin | 64 | 61 | 67 | — | 50 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 73 | 100 | 57 | — | 75 | 71 | 80 | 63 | 67 | 50 |
| Appleton | 40 | 25 | 50 | 13 | 33 | 50 | 47 | 67 | 20 | 33 | 57 | 100 | 40 | 44 | 44 | 33 | 83 | 40 |
| Copp | 50 | 50 | 80 | 54 | 50 | 67 | 63 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 43 | 75 | 100 | 33 | 33 | 67 | 67 | 100 |
| Rasmussen | 25 | 25 | 63 | 40 | 36 | 67 | 63 | 100 | 67 | 71 | 40 | 75 | 78 | 25 | 25 | 50 | 80 | 100 |
| Raymond | 63 | 63 | 70 | — | 60 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 76 | — | 57 | — | 89 | 71 | 75 | 58 | 65 | 67 |
| Compher | 33 | 0 | 44 | 40 | 50 | 67 | 38 | 67 | 17 | 42 | 57 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 40 | 75 | 50 |
| van Riemsdyk | 100 | 100 | 67 | 54 | 50 | 67 | 57 | 100 | 67 | 71 | 50 | 67 | 80 | 33 | 33 | 63 | 75 | 100 |
| DeBrincat | 60 | 67 | 64 | 63 | 69 | 69 | 50 | 83 | 29 | 14 | 65 | 100 | 68 | 50 | 43 | 71 | 75 | 77 |
| Brandsegg-Nygård | 75 | 80 | 67 | 71 | 67 | 82 | 71 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 67 | 100 | 81 | 67 | 56 | 100 | 83 | 77 |
| Berggren | 100 | — | 57 | 25 | 50 | 67 | 56 | 78 | 17 | 44 | 57 | 100 | 43 | 57 | 57 | 67 | 75 | 40 |
| Seider | 57 | 57 | 75 | 14 | 58 | 0 | 60 | 100 | 69 | 50 | 68 | 100 | 75 | 67 | 75 | 57 | 66 | 60 |
| Edvinsson | 64 | 60 | 50 | 57 | 56 | 60 | 45 | 70 | 63 | 50 | 56 | 0 | 75 | 35 | 28 | 78 | 80 | 75 |
| Chiarot | 52 | 52 | 77 | 17 | 62 | — | 75 | 100 | 69 | 50 | 65 | 100 | 88 | 67 | 75 | 52 | 62 | 80 |
| Sandin-Pellikka | 50 | 50 | 47 | 58 | 53 | 50 | 47 | 63 | 57 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 76 | 32 | 28 | 67 | 71 | 79 |
| Johansson | — | — | 56 | 50 | 33 | 72 | 64 | 93 | 27 | 38 | 33 | 100 | 58 | 63 | 59 | 33 | 100 | 63 |
| Bernard-Docker | — | — | 60 | 63 | 40 | 75 | 75 | 92 | 27 | 43 | 43 | 100 | 63 | 63 | 61 | 33 | 100 | 83 |
