Game Recap
The Pittsburgh Penguins defeated the Los Angeles Kings 4-2 on October 16, 2025. Expected goals were closely matched at 5-on-5 (LAK 9.11, PIT 8.56), making this a tightly contested game on both sides of the puck. The Pittsburgh Penguins created 13 high-danger scoring chances compared to 12 from the Los Angeles Kings at 5-on-5. Quinton Byfield was the most dangerous skater with 2.55 individual expected goals on 6 shots at 5-on-5. The Los Angeles Kings outshot the Pittsburgh Penguins 32-26 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Pittsburgh Penguins vs Los Angeles Kings progressed on Oct 16, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
PIT4 - 2LAK
Oct 16, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| LAK | P1 | 16 | 14 | 53.3 | 14 | 11 | 56.0 | 11 | 8 | 57.9 | 11 | 10 | 52.4 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 3.08 | 3.52 | 46.7 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 19 | 16 | 54.3 | 14 | 11 | 56.0 | 11 | 8 | 57.9 | 14 | 10 | 58.3 | 5 | 4 | 55.6 | 3.45 | 2.11 | 62.1 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 26 | 18 | 59.1 | 16 | 16 | 50.0 | 10 | 10 | 50.0 | 19 | 10 | 65.5 | 5 | 6 | 45.5 | 3.32 | 4.49 | 42.5 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 61 | 48 | 56.0 | 44 | 38 | 53.7 | 32 | 26 | 55.2 | 44 | 30 | 59.5 | 14 | 14 | 50.0 | 9.85 | 10.12 | 49.3 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | |
| PIT | P1 | 14 | 16 | 46.7 | 11 | 14 | 44.0 | 8 | 11 | 42.1 | 10 | 11 | 47.6 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 3.52 | 3.08 | 53.3 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 16 | 19 | 45.7 | 11 | 14 | 44.0 | 8 | 11 | 42.1 | 10 | 14 | 41.7 | 4 | 5 | 44.4 | 2.11 | 3.45 | 37.9 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 18 | 26 | 40.9 | 16 | 16 | 50.0 | 10 | 10 | 50.0 | 10 | 19 | 34.5 | 6 | 5 | 54.5 | 4.49 | 3.32 | 57.5 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 48 | 61 | 44.0 | 38 | 44 | 46.3 | 26 | 32 | 44.8 | 30 | 44 | 40.5 | 14 | 14 | 50.0 | 10.12 | 9.85 | 50.7 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | |
Win Probability
LAK Favored
PIT Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
LAK
PIT
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
PIT Attempts
LAK Attempts
Individual Event Map
PIT ShootLAK Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Attempt Blocked
Hit Taken
Takeaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (LAK) performed against every skater on the away team (PIT) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = LAK players, Columns = PIT players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the LAK player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| LAK ↓ / PIT → | Crosby | Lizotte | Malkin | Acciari | Dewar | Hallander | Novak | Rust | Rakell | Mantha | Brazeau | Tomasino | Shea | Letang | Karlsson | Wotherspoon | Jones | Brunicke |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danault | 56 | 30 | 75 | 50 | 50 | 15 | 50 | 50 | 38 | 100 | 100 | 40 | 39 | 45 | 25 | 14 | 67 | 80 |
| Turcotte | 71 | 50 | 67 | 54 | 46 | 60 | 75 | 70 | 50 | 60 | 60 | 75 | 69 | 63 | 29 | 45 | 67 | 75 |
| Helenius | — | 20 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 50 | 50 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 50 | 20 | 20 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| Kuzmenko | 64 | 50 | 67 | 70 | 75 | 33 | 57 | 67 | 73 | 67 | 60 | 50 | 67 | 59 | 20 | 57 | 100 | 100 |
| Foegele | 56 | 44 | 44 | 45 | 42 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 40 | 33 | 33 | 50 | 60 | 56 | 20 | 18 | 58 | 67 |
| Fiala | 72 | 56 | 71 | 89 | 64 | 100 | 100 | 65 | 71 | 71 | 50 | 100 | 83 | 76 | 50 | 61 | 71 | 88 |
| Moore | 64 | 47 | 50 | 50 | 45 | 50 | 50 | 58 | 57 | 38 | 38 | 50 | 73 | 70 | 22 | 20 | 58 | 67 |
| Malott | 100 | 20 | 25 | 20 | 20 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 25 | 0 | 50 | 33 | 20 | 40 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
| Kempe | 69 | 46 | 56 | 64 | 67 | 33 | 57 | 71 | 75 | 60 | 50 | 50 | 65 | 58 | 25 | 50 | 100 | 100 |
| Byfield | 75 | 56 | 63 | 89 | 64 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 73 | 67 | 38 | 100 | 84 | 76 | 50 | 62 | 67 | 86 |
| Armia | 78 | 42 | 86 | 80 | 43 | 17 | 100 | 61 | 50 | 77 | 50 | 100 | 56 | 69 | 60 | 48 | 43 | 67 |
| Laferriere | 40 | 30 | 33 | 44 | 38 | 14 | 50 | 38 | 20 | 29 | 29 | 50 | 17 | 40 | 25 | 9 | 56 | 50 |
| Doughty | 75 | 63 | 60 | 86 | 83 | 14 | 50 | 71 | 59 | 71 | 0 | 33 | 71 | 75 | 60 | 55 | 50 | 60 |
| Clarke | 0 | 28 | 60 | 43 | 31 | 23 | 60 | 10 | 0 | 57 | 46 | 71 | 22 | 38 | 11 | 7 | 69 | 82 |
| Dumoulin | 72 | 75 | 80 | 75 | 75 | 50 | 67 | 72 | 67 | 100 | — | 50 | 86 | 75 | 63 | 73 | 50 | 67 |
| Edmundson | 0 | 28 | 50 | 36 | 29 | 29 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 54 | 42 | 67 | 26 | 32 | 11 | 13 | 75 | 89 |
| Anderson | 63 | 50 | 54 | 45 | 45 | 50 | 50 | 56 | 50 | 46 | 45 | 50 | 58 | 58 | 27 | 18 | 62 | 67 |
| Ceci | 78 | 54 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 57 | 67 | 70 | 67 | 50 | 44 | 67 | 64 | 67 | 30 | 25 | 67 | 73 |
