Winnipeg Jets vs Philadelphia Flyers — October 16, 2025 Game Stats

Game Recap

WPG 5, PHI 2 — the Winnipeg Jets got the win on October 16, 2025. Niederreiter was the most dangerous skater at 5-on-5, racking up 1.32 individual expected goals on 2 shots. Mark Scheifele had a 2-goal game. The expected goals were nearly even at 5-on-5 — PHI 3.70, WPG 3.92. PHI outshot WPG 17-15.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Winnipeg Jets vs Philadelphia Flyers progressed on Oct 16, 2025
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

WPG5 - 2PHI

Oct 16, 2025 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
PHI	P1	9	15	37.5	6	9	40.0	3	5	37.5	8	10	44.4	1	5	16.7	2.07	2.13	49.2	0	1	0.0
	P2	21	9	70.0	17	6	73.9	12	5	70.6	16	8	66.7	1	3	25.0	2.61	1.63	61.6	1	2	33.3
	P3	6	14	30.0	4	7	36.4	2	5	28.6	3	8	27.3	1	2	33.3	0.43	0.67	39.1	1	2	33.3
	Total	36	38	48.6	27	22	55.1	17	15	53.1	27	26	50.9	3	10	23.1	5.11	4.43	53.6	2	5	28.6
WPG	P1	15	9	62.5	9	6	60.0	5	3	62.5	10	8	55.6	5	1	83.3	2.13	2.07	50.8	1	0	100.0
	P2	9	21	30.0	6	17	26.1	5	12	29.4	8	16	33.3	3	1	75.0	1.63	2.61	38.4	2	1	66.7
	P3	14	6	70.0	7	4	63.6	5	2	71.4	8	3	72.7	2	1	66.7	0.67	0.43	60.9	2	1	66.7
	Total	38	36	51.4	22	27	44.9	15	17	46.9	26	27	49.1	10	3	76.9	4.43	5.11	46.4	5	2	71.4

Win Probability

PHI Favored

WPG Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

PHI

WPG

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

WPG Attempts

PHI Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

WPG ShootPHI Shoot

Hit

Giveaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (PHI) performed against every skater on the away team (WPG) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = PHI players, Columns = WPG players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the PHI player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

PHI ↓ / WPG →	Scheifele	Vilardi	Toews	Barron	Ford	Namestnikov	Connor	Iafallo	Pearson	Koepke	Niederreiter	Nyquist	DeMelo	Morrissey	Pionk	Stanley	Schenn	Fleury
Zegras	25	40	50	44	44	70	29	67	50	50	43	50	22	17	69	50	70	80
Couturier	38	0	53	40	50	75	38	47	47	50	60	67	44	36	69	60	43	56
Dvorak	14	25	67	50	50	57	25	33	67	50	50	50	0	10	63	60	70	67
Luchanko	67	67	0	0	0	0	50	0	0	0	0	0	0	20	0	13	33	50
Cates	67	62	100	0	0	25	53	100	100	67	0	0	58	58	56	29	50	67
Tippett	57	33	43	67	67	57	57	50	43	71	43	50	25	25	80	75	64	70
Michkov	50	0	58	40	50	75	50	54	50	50	75	67	50	44	69	60	43	56
Konecny	50	0	58	40	50	75	50	54	50	50	75	67	57	50	69	60	33	50
Brink	67	62	100	0	0	50	53	100	100	67	0	0	62	55	64	17	67	83
Foerster	64	58	100	—	—	50	58	100	100	100	0	0	73	67	70	20	50	80
Hathaway	33	50	0	0	0	20	40	0	0	0	0	0	0	29	0	11	33	0
Grebenkin	50	50	0	0	0	0	40	0	0	0	0	0	0	17	0	13	33	50
Sanheim	55	44	33	29	29	56	44	43	33	38	38	33	54	33	61	20	50	71
York	58	50	38	29	29	40	50	30	38	38	43	40	54	40	53	20	75	67
Drysdale	47	45	56	50	50	54	47	58	50	60	33	33	42	47	56	43	54	64
Seeler	27	33	63	40	50	40	31	56	50	50	33	33	33	36	42	38	50	57
Juulsen	33	33	67	29	29	0	20	67	67	33	0	0	22	22	60	50	0	33
Ginning	0	0	50	14	17	0	0	50	33	20	0	0	0	0	50	50	0	0