Game Recap
The Utah Mammoth defeated the Calgary Flames 3-1 on October 15, 2025. Expected goals were closely matched at 5-on-5 (UTA 5.82, CGY 6.11), making this a tightly contested game on both sides of the puck. The Calgary Flames created 9 high-danger scoring chances compared to 6 from the Utah Mammoth at 5-on-5. Blake Coleman was the most dangerous skater with 1.58 individual expected goals on 2 shots at 5-on-5. The Utah Mammoth outshot the Calgary Flames 32-20 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Calgary Flames vs Utah Mammoth progressed on Oct 15, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
CGY1 - 3UTA
Oct 15, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| UTA | P1 | 14 | 17 | 45.2 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 10 | 5 | 66.7 | 7 | 13 | 35.0 | 1 | 5 | 16.7 | 1.91 | 3.77 | 33.6 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 38 | 11 | 77.6 | 29 | 5 | 85.3 | 18 | 3 | 85.7 | 30 | 8 | 78.9 | 12 | 1 | 92.3 | 7.44 | 1.20 | 86.1 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 10 | 28 | 26.3 | 7 | 22 | 24.1 | 4 | 12 | 25.0 | 8 | 20 | 28.6 | 2 | 7 | 22.2 | 1.31 | 4.44 | 22.8 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 62 | 56 | 52.5 | 48 | 39 | 55.2 | 32 | 20 | 61.5 | 45 | 41 | 52.3 | 15 | 13 | 53.6 | 10.66 | 9.40 | 53.1 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | |
| CGY | P1 | 17 | 14 | 54.8 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 5 | 10 | 33.3 | 13 | 7 | 65.0 | 5 | 1 | 83.3 | 3.77 | 1.91 | 66.4 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 11 | 38 | 22.4 | 5 | 29 | 14.7 | 3 | 18 | 14.3 | 8 | 30 | 21.1 | 1 | 12 | 7.7 | 1.20 | 7.44 | 13.9 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 28 | 10 | 73.7 | 22 | 7 | 75.9 | 12 | 4 | 75.0 | 20 | 8 | 71.4 | 7 | 2 | 77.8 | 4.44 | 1.31 | 77.2 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 56 | 62 | 47.5 | 39 | 48 | 44.8 | 20 | 32 | 38.5 | 41 | 45 | 47.7 | 13 | 15 | 46.4 | 9.40 | 10.66 | 46.9 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | |
Win Probability
UTA Favored
CGY Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
UTA
CGY
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
CGY Attempts
UTA Attempts
Individual Event Map
CGY ShootUTA Shoot
Missed Shot
Hit
Hit Taken
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (UTA) performed against every skater on the away team (CGY) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = UTA players, Columns = CGY players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the UTA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| UTA ↓ / CGY → | Backlund | Kadri | Frost | Zary | Sharangovich | Kirkland | Farabee | Coleman | Honzek | Lomberg | Coronato | Klapka | Bahl | Andersson | Weegar | Parekh | Hanley | Pachal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley | 79 | 21 | 40 | 29 | 63 | 100 | 56 | 72 | 75 | 100 | 20 | 100 | 62 | 69 | 57 | 67 | 93 | 77 |
| Schmaltz | 61 | 43 | 0 | 60 | 100 | 80 | 56 | 68 | 63 | 17 | 43 | 20 | 43 | 53 | 78 | 33 | 82 | 71 |
| Hayton | 54 | 43 | 0 | 67 | 100 | 0 | 57 | 61 | 65 | 29 | 43 | 20 | 52 | 61 | 64 | 50 | 69 | 55 |
| McBain | 50 | 31 | 25 | 50 | 0 | 33 | 39 | 50 | 83 | 40 | 42 | 25 | 40 | 40 | 42 | 22 | 83 | 43 |
| Stenlund | 86 | 11 | 14 | 17 | 22 | 100 | 36 | 67 | 75 | 80 | 24 | 100 | 0 | 14 | 56 | 39 | 83 | 53 |
| Crouse | 80 | 50 | 30 | 57 | 50 | 33 | 30 | 80 | 100 | 40 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 38 | 55 | 40 | 100 | 50 |
| Tanev | 86 | 11 | 14 | 0 | 17 | 100 | 40 | 75 | 75 | 80 | 27 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 50 | 83 | 53 |
| Carcone | 67 | 100 | 11 | 100 | — | 67 | 36 | 50 | 50 | 56 | 33 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 25 | 89 | 60 |
| Guenther | 84 | 38 | 100 | 29 | 63 | 100 | 90 | 78 | 88 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 62 | 79 | 78 | 67 | 100 | 83 |
| Keller | 63 | 50 | 0 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 73 | 67 | 20 | 43 | 40 | 50 | 63 | 78 | 50 | 80 | 69 |
| Peterka | 73 | 40 | 75 | 43 | 88 | 50 | 85 | 50 | 78 | 67 | 100 | 20 | 71 | 71 | 67 | 64 | 100 | 57 |
| Yamamoto | 83 | 33 | 20 | 40 | 57 | 100 | 56 | 71 | 86 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 89 | 100 | 43 | 100 | 36 |
| Sergachev | 74 | 60 | 33 | 57 | 71 | 71 | 48 | 74 | 78 | 33 | 36 | 29 | 35 | 44 | 77 | 25 | 100 | 85 |
| Schmidt | 56 | 23 | 13 | 67 | 50 | 100 | 47 | 56 | 64 | 57 | 38 | 40 | 62 | 75 | 38 | 67 | 60 | 58 |
| Cole | 55 | 27 | 25 | 14 | 33 | 75 | 33 | 46 | 67 | 50 | 22 | 25 | 25 | 22 | 60 | 30 | 83 | 40 |
| Marino | 47 | 20 | 11 | 50 | 25 | 100 | 27 | 43 | 43 | 33 | 43 | 40 | 22 | 50 | 28 | 62 | 44 | 55 |
| Simashev | 57 | 36 | 44 | 42 | 63 | 33 | 50 | 44 | 50 | 40 | 57 | 33 | 31 | 45 | 46 | 38 | 88 | 33 |
| Määttä | 88 | 33 | 20 | 33 | 50 | 80 | 38 | 88 | 86 | 83 | 10 | 60 | 33 | 33 | 100 | 47 | 100 | 47 |
