Game Recap
After a back-and-forth affair, the Utah Mammoth pulled out a 3-2 win in overtime on Saturday. NSH held a slight 8-5 edge in high-danger chances. Haula was the most dangerous skater at 5-on-5, racking up 1.41 individual expected goals on 3 shots. The underlying numbers told a different story — NSH actually held the xG edge (6.68 to 4.02) at 5-on-5, but it didn't matter on the scoreboard. Both teams put 23 shots on net.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Utah Mammoth vs Nashville Predators progressed on Oct 11, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
UTA3 - 2NSH (OT)
Oct 11, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| NSH | P1 | 13 | 19 | 40.6 | 10 | 14 | 41.7 | 6 | 11 | 35.3 | 10 | 15 | 40.0 | 1 | 5 | 16.7 | 1.97 | 3.56 | 35.6 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 24 | 6 | 80.0 | 17 | 3 | 85.0 | 9 | 3 | 75.0 | 20 | 5 | 80.0 | 6 | 0 | 100.0 | 4.74 | 0.22 | 95.6 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 23 | 16 | 59.0 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 8 | 8 | 50.0 | 20 | 13 | 60.6 | 6 | 4 | 60.0 | 3.25 | 3.37 | 49.1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| OT | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.73 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 60 | 43 | 58.3 | 39 | 30 | 56.5 | 23 | 23 | 50.0 | 50 | 35 | 58.8 | 13 | 10 | 56.5 | 9.96 | 7.88 | 55.8 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | |
| UTA | P1 | 19 | 13 | 59.4 | 14 | 10 | 58.3 | 11 | 6 | 64.7 | 15 | 10 | 60.0 | 5 | 1 | 83.3 | 3.56 | 1.97 | 64.4 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 6 | 24 | 20.0 | 3 | 17 | 15.0 | 3 | 9 | 25.0 | 5 | 20 | 20.0 | 0 | 6 | 0.0 | 0.22 | 4.74 | 4.4 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 16 | 23 | 41.0 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 8 | 8 | 50.0 | 13 | 20 | 39.4 | 4 | 6 | 40.0 | 3.37 | 3.25 | 50.9 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| OT | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 43 | 60 | 41.7 | 30 | 39 | 43.5 | 23 | 23 | 50.0 | 35 | 50 | 41.2 | 10 | 13 | 43.5 | 7.88 | 9.96 | 44.2 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | |
Win Probability
NSH Favored
UTA Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
NSH
UTA
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
UTA Attempts
NSH Attempts
Individual Event Map
UTA ShootNSH Shoot
Attempt Blocked
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (NSH) performed against every skater on the away team (UTA) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = NSH players, Columns = UTA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the NSH player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| NSH ↓ / UTA → | Schmaltz | Cooley | Stenlund | McBain | Crouse | Tanev | Agozzino | Keller | Guenther | Peterka | Yamamoto | Sergachev | Cole | Marino | Durzi | Schmidt | Määttä | Simashev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O'Reilly | 60 | 40 | 94 | 71 | 92 | 83 | — | 55 | 76 | 50 | 0 | 87 | 90 | 57 | 67 | 50 | 0 | 33 |
| Stamkos | 75 | 25 | 91 | 100 | 89 | 89 | 100 | 67 | 69 | 50 | 60 | 90 | 100 | 63 | 80 | 57 | 0 | 100 |
| McCarron | 29 | 33 | 60 | 67 | 50 | 67 | 67 | 35 | 37 | 56 | 0 | 31 | 78 | 88 | 38 | 50 | 43 | 75 |
| Svechkov | 50 | 33 | 67 | 67 | 57 | 45 | 60 | 50 | 25 | 50 | 36 | 46 | 43 | 42 | 60 | 67 | — | 100 |
| Jost | 50 | 50 | 67 | 50 | 67 | 67 | 67 | 63 | 40 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 71 | 75 | 29 | 50 | 38 | 80 |
| Martin | 50 | 67 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 100 | — | 50 | 57 | 40 | 100 | 60 | 50 | 75 | 60 | 86 | 0 | 0 |
| Forsberg | 44 | 20 | 88 | 69 | 85 | 71 | 100 | 44 | 63 | 43 | — | 82 | 81 | 44 | 75 | 67 | 0 | 33 |
| Haula | 60 | 30 | 67 | 91 | 63 | 25 | 0 | 64 | 58 | 40 | 0 | 77 | 22 | 58 | 63 | 57 | 33 | 33 |
| Bunting | 90 | 57 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 25 | 0 | 82 | 75 | 33 | 25 | 84 | 67 | 80 | 83 | 80 | 0 | 60 |
| Marchessault | 71 | 44 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 33 | 40 | 80 | 77 | 60 | 0 | 100 | 71 | 67 | 83 | 67 | 33 | 50 |
| Evangelista | 100 | 60 | 56 | 89 | 62 | 44 | 100 | 90 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 60 | 40 | 57 | 67 | 90 | 100 | 100 |
| Smith | 14 | 24 | 67 | 57 | 67 | 67 | 67 | 24 | 29 | 50 | 0 | 17 | 75 | 83 | 29 | 40 | 43 | 75 |
| Josi | 56 | 33 | 100 | 87 | 100 | 83 | 67 | 50 | 67 | 50 | 50 | 88 | 95 | 100 | 50 | 20 | 33 | 88 |
| Skjei | 44 | 37 | 90 | 79 | 91 | 62 | 50 | 60 | 50 | 55 | 22 | 57 | 50 | 65 | 75 | 71 | 67 | 57 |
| Perbix | 35 | 21 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 55 | 33 | 52 | 35 | 50 | 11 | 48 | 27 | 56 | 75 | 58 | 67 | 25 |
| Wilsby | 67 | 43 | 83 | 80 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 64 | 45 | 43 | 100 | 82 | 75 | 83 | 43 | 33 | 40 | 88 |
| Stastney | 55 | 33 | 43 | 60 | 38 | 43 | 67 | 50 | 22 | 40 | 33 | 50 | 40 | 50 | 58 | 63 | 20 | 50 |
| Barron | 50 | 25 | 33 | 63 | 29 | 33 | 67 | 47 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 42 | 0 | 44 | 55 | 71 | 25 | 0 |
