Game Recap
The Nashville Predators defeated the Columbus Blue Jackets 2-1 on October 9, 2025. Despite the result, the Columbus Blue Jackets held the edge in expected goals (8.08 to 5.99) at 5-on-5, indicating the Nashville Predators received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The Columbus Blue Jackets created 13 high-danger scoring chances compared to 6 from the Nashville Predators at 5-on-5. Dmitri Voronkov was the most dangerous skater with 1.77 individual expected goals on 2 shots at 5-on-5. The Columbus Blue Jackets outshot the Nashville Predators 39-32 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Columbus Blue Jackets vs Nashville Predators progressed on Oct 9, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
CBJ1 - 2NSH
Oct 9, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| NSH | P1 | 19 | 25 | 43.2 | 13 | 17 | 43.3 | 9 | 15 | 37.5 | 15 | 19 | 44.1 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | 1.87 | 3.10 | 37.6 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 14 | 29 | 32.6 | 12 | 21 | 36.4 | 9 | 14 | 39.1 | 10 | 17 | 37.0 | 2 | 7 | 22.2 | 2.91 | 4.57 | 38.9 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 27 | 18 | 60.0 | 20 | 13 | 60.6 | 14 | 10 | 58.3 | 16 | 9 | 64.0 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 3.90 | 1.50 | 72.2 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 60 | 72 | 45.5 | 45 | 51 | 46.9 | 32 | 39 | 45.1 | 41 | 45 | 47.7 | 7 | 14 | 33.3 | 8.67 | 9.17 | 48.6 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| CBJ | P1 | 25 | 19 | 56.8 | 17 | 13 | 56.7 | 15 | 9 | 62.5 | 19 | 15 | 55.9 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | 3.10 | 1.87 | 62.4 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 29 | 14 | 67.4 | 21 | 12 | 63.6 | 14 | 9 | 60.9 | 17 | 10 | 63.0 | 7 | 2 | 77.8 | 4.57 | 2.91 | 61.1 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 18 | 27 | 40.0 | 13 | 20 | 39.4 | 10 | 14 | 41.7 | 9 | 16 | 36.0 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 1.50 | 3.90 | 27.8 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 72 | 60 | 54.5 | 51 | 45 | 53.1 | 39 | 32 | 54.9 | 45 | 41 | 52.3 | 14 | 7 | 66.7 | 9.17 | 8.67 | 51.4 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
Win Probability
NSH Favored
CBJ Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
NSH
CBJ
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
CBJ Attempts
NSH Attempts
Individual Event Map
CBJ ShootNSH Shoot
Shot on Net
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Takeaway
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (NSH) performed against every skater on the away team (CBJ) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = NSH players, Columns = CBJ players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the NSH player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| NSH ↓ / CBJ → | Monahan | Jenner | Coyle | Sillinger | Fantilli | Johnson | Lundeström | Voronkov | Wood | Aston-Reese | Marchenko | Olivier | Werenski | Provorov | Severson | Mateychuk | Fabbro | Gudbranson |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O'Reilly | 32 | 41 | 100 | 25 | 25 | 50 | 86 | 47 | 86 | 80 | 29 | 100 | 48 | 50 | 33 | 38 | 36 | 100 |
| Stamkos | 50 | 71 | 57 | 33 | 57 | 20 | 57 | 67 | 67 | 80 | 43 | 47 | 54 | 65 | 36 | 14 | 69 | 83 |
| McCarron | 35 | 33 | 20 | 25 | 33 | 13 | 83 | 40 | 75 | 86 | 32 | 43 | 38 | 45 | 29 | 75 | 55 | 80 |
| Svechkov | 50 | 78 | 25 | 75 | 75 | 14 | 57 | 60 | 67 | 75 | 50 | 30 | 60 | 25 | 13 | 30 | 86 | 33 |
| Jost | 43 | 40 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 20 | 83 | 42 | 75 | 86 | 38 | 40 | 42 | 50 | 31 | 67 | 55 | 80 |
| Martin | 23 | 42 | — | 30 | 27 | — | 86 | 21 | 86 | 83 | 21 | — | 58 | 14 | 8 | 38 | 56 | 100 |
| Forsberg | 27 | 42 | 85 | 29 | 31 | 33 | 86 | 44 | 75 | 80 | 24 | 80 | 45 | 48 | 26 | 40 | 36 | 92 |
| Haula | 13 | 33 | 13 | 38 | 36 | 10 | — | 20 | — | — | 13 | 14 | 33 | 25 | 13 | 25 | 57 | 33 |
| Bunting | 57 | 57 | 40 | 42 | 38 | 29 | 100 | 44 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 38 | 81 | 25 | 30 | 36 | 79 | 33 |
| Marchessault | 67 | 60 | 67 | 38 | 40 | 29 | 100 | 56 | 100 | 100 | 63 | 33 | 69 | 65 | 30 | 40 | 70 | 67 |
| Smith | 38 | 29 | 13 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 83 | 42 | 86 | 86 | 33 | 20 | 33 | 57 | 31 | 100 | 50 | 100 |
| Kemell | 25 | 83 | 14 | 75 | 75 | 0 | 57 | 33 | 67 | 50 | 33 | 22 | 63 | 33 | 10 | 22 | 80 | 33 |
| Josi | 41 | 55 | 75 | 29 | 20 | 43 | 67 | 41 | 70 | 83 | 37 | 40 | 47 | 54 | 21 | 25 | 59 | 92 |
| Skjei | 9 | 34 | 43 | 35 | 36 | 8 | 60 | 46 | 75 | 100 | 15 | 45 | 49 | 15 | 33 | 44 | 47 | 33 |
| Wilsby | 37 | 44 | 50 | 29 | 20 | 50 | 75 | 39 | 67 | 80 | 35 | 50 | 47 | 27 | 20 | 25 | 59 | 80 |
| Perbix | 17 | 30 | 43 | 36 | 39 | 9 | — | 58 | — | — | 23 | 50 | 43 | 23 | 42 | 50 | 29 | 40 |
| Barron | 0 | 100 | 17 | 33 | 57 | 15 | 75 | 0 | 75 | 75 | 0 | 31 | 47 | 33 | 0 | 33 | 75 | 44 |
| Stastney | 50 | 100 | 9 | 50 | 67 | 8 | 75 | 50 | 75 | 75 | 50 | 31 | 44 | 40 | 20 | 33 | 75 | 50 |
