Game Recap
The New York Rangers shut out the Buffalo Sabres 4-0 on October 9, 2025. Despite the result, the Buffalo Sabres held the edge in expected goals (4.07 to 3.40) at 5-on-5, indicating the New York Rangers received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The New York Rangers created 4 high-danger scoring chances compared to 2 from the Buffalo Sabres at 5-on-5. Jason Zucker was the most dangerous skater with 0.84 individual expected goals on 4 shots at 5-on-5. The Buffalo Sabres outshot the New York Rangers 37-33 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as New York Rangers vs Buffalo Sabres progressed on Oct 9, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
NYR4 - 0BUF
Oct 9, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| BUF | P1 | 18 | 27 | 40.0 | 15 | 20 | 42.9 | 11 | 16 | 40.7 | 10 | 13 | 43.5 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 1.27 | 2.14 | 37.1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 29 | 12 | 70.7 | 21 | 9 | 70.0 | 14 | 5 | 73.7 | 18 | 7 | 72.0 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 3.35 | 1.18 | 74.0 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 21 | 21 | 50.0 | 16 | 17 | 48.5 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 7 | 11 | 38.9 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | 2.58 | 3.31 | 43.8 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 68 | 60 | 53.1 | 52 | 46 | 53.1 | 37 | 33 | 52.9 | 35 | 31 | 53.0 | 4 | 9 | 30.8 | 7.19 | 6.63 | 52.0 | 0 | 4 | 0.0 | |
| NYR | P1 | 27 | 18 | 60.0 | 20 | 15 | 57.1 | 16 | 11 | 59.3 | 13 | 10 | 56.5 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 | 2.14 | 1.27 | 62.9 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 12 | 29 | 29.3 | 9 | 21 | 30.0 | 5 | 14 | 26.3 | 7 | 18 | 28.0 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 1.18 | 3.35 | 26.0 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 21 | 21 | 50.0 | 17 | 16 | 51.5 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 11 | 7 | 61.1 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | 3.31 | 2.58 | 56.2 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 60 | 68 | 46.9 | 46 | 52 | 46.9 | 33 | 37 | 47.1 | 31 | 35 | 47.0 | 9 | 4 | 69.2 | 6.63 | 7.19 | 48.0 | 4 | 0 | 100.0 | |
Win Probability
BUF Favored
NYR Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
BUF
NYR
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
NYR Attempts
BUF Attempts
Individual Event Map
NYR ShootBUF Shoot
Shot on Net
Hit Taken
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (BUF) performed against every skater on the away team (NYR) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = BUF players, Columns = NYR players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the BUF player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| BUF ↓ / NYR → | Miller | Zibanejad | Laba | Carrick | Trocheck | Edstrom | Rempe | Panarin | Cuylle | Sheary | Lafrenière | Raddysh | Fox | Gavrikov | Schneider | Soucy | Borgen | Vaakanainen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thompson | 56 | 64 | 38 | 50 | 100 | 25 | 20 | 40 | 47 | 63 | 57 | 60 | 59 | 58 | 54 | 44 | 56 | 70 |
| Norris | 57 | 50 | 57 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 25 | 29 | 42 | 63 | 50 | 73 | 58 | 57 | 63 | 63 | 67 | 71 |
| McLeod | 27 | 43 | 50 | 50 | 29 | 29 | 20 | 29 | 30 | 36 | 33 | 56 | 39 | 59 | 36 | 44 | 50 | 50 |
| Kulich | 75 | 57 | 50 | 64 | 67 | 25 | 33 | 77 | 67 | 36 | 70 | 38 | 40 | 50 | 47 | 65 | 68 | 47 |
| Krebs | 14 | 33 | 67 | 17 | 100 | 20 | 17 | 67 | 14 | 33 | 75 | 50 | 25 | 18 | 57 | 75 | 75 | 60 |
| Zucker | 80 | 90 | 40 | 56 | 80 | 33 | 40 | 60 | 69 | 65 | 63 | 54 | 72 | 70 | 60 | 64 | 67 | 60 |
| Malenstyn | 40 | 25 | 25 | 50 | 29 | 60 | 67 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 0 | 38 | 50 | 17 | 57 | 50 | 20 |
| Tuch | 59 | 29 | 47 | 69 | 67 | 20 | 22 | 43 | 55 | 40 | 44 | 44 | 50 | 71 | 35 | 68 | 71 | 44 |
| Quinn | 69 | 50 | 53 | 69 | 100 | 40 | 33 | 89 | 62 | 38 | 100 | 47 | 67 | 67 | 44 | 70 | 76 | 42 |
| Doan | 50 | 75 | 71 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 25 | 80 | 33 | 57 | 100 | 70 | 63 | 67 | 63 | 71 | 80 | 67 |
| Danforth | 33 | 25 | 50 | 43 | 50 | 57 | 57 | 50 | 33 | 0 | 60 | 33 | 40 | 50 | 29 | 100 | 100 | 20 |
| Dahlin | 61 | 38 | 82 | 71 | 85 | 40 | 43 | 75 | 50 | 70 | 85 | 82 | 61 | 65 | 78 | 73 | 73 | 86 |
| Byram | 57 | 50 | 92 | 65 | 75 | 33 | 30 | 73 | 50 | 60 | 86 | 82 | 41 | 50 | 64 | 89 | 95 | 89 |
| Samuelsson | 31 | 47 | 27 | 25 | 57 | 40 | 25 | 26 | 54 | 32 | 35 | 23 | 38 | 50 | 42 | 33 | 38 | 45 |
| Timmins | 31 | 47 | 31 | 25 | 50 | 40 | 17 | 22 | 47 | 33 | 31 | 29 | 33 | 43 | 39 | 44 | 50 | 48 |
| Bryson | 0 | 0 | 14 | 40 | 0 | 40 | 40 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 14 | 25 | 0 | 33 | 20 | 14 |
| Johnson | 33 | — | 29 | 36 | 0 | 36 | 36 | 20 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 25 | 20 | 27 | 0 | 50 | 33 | 14 |
| Geertsen | 50 | — | 0 | 67 | 0 | 67 | 75 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 67 | 0 | 40 | 25 | 0 |
