Game Recap
The Montreal Canadiens prevailed 5-4 in a high-scoring affair against the Pittsburgh Penguins on October 31, 2026. Josh Anderson had a 2-goal game. MTL got the two points, but PIT held a 2.32-2.03 expected goals edge at even strength.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Pittsburgh Penguins vs Montreal Canadiens progressed on Oct 31, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
PIT4 - 5MTL
Oct 31, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| MTL | P1 | 25 | 14 | 64.1 | 20 | 10 | 66.7 | 14 | 6 | 70.0 | 15 | 9 | 62.5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 | 1.16 | 0.54 | 68.3 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 16 | 19 | 45.7 | 10 | 13 | 43.5 | 9 | 8 | 52.9 | 12 | 14 | 46.2 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | 1.13 | 1.12 | 50.1 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | |
| P3 | 6 | 37 | 14.0 | 5 | 25 | 16.7 | 4 | 15 | 21.1 | 5 | 28 | 15.2 | 1 | 8 | 11.1 | 0.48 | 2.08 | 18.9 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 47 | 70 | 40.2 | 35 | 48 | 42.2 | 27 | 29 | 48.2 | 32 | 51 | 38.6 | 8 | 11 | 42.1 | 2.77 | 3.74 | 42.6 | 5 | 4 | 55.6 | |
| PIT | P1 | 14 | 25 | 35.9 | 10 | 20 | 33.3 | 6 | 14 | 30.0 | 9 | 15 | 37.5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 | 0.54 | 1.16 | 31.7 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 19 | 16 | 54.3 | 13 | 10 | 56.5 | 8 | 9 | 47.1 | 14 | 12 | 53.8 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | 1.12 | 1.13 | 49.9 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | |
| P3 | 37 | 6 | 86.0 | 25 | 5 | 83.3 | 15 | 4 | 78.9 | 28 | 5 | 84.8 | 8 | 1 | 88.9 | 2.08 | 0.48 | 81.1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 70 | 47 | 59.8 | 48 | 35 | 57.8 | 29 | 27 | 51.8 | 51 | 32 | 61.4 | 11 | 8 | 57.9 | 3.74 | 2.77 | 57.4 | 4 | 5 | 44.4 | |
Win Probability
MTL Favored
PIT Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
MTL
PIT
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
PIT Attempts
MTL Attempts
Individual Event Map
PIT ShootMTL Shoot
Shot on Net
Attempt Blocked
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (MTL) performed against every skater on the away team (PIT) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = MTL players, Columns = PIT players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the MTL player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| MTL ↓ / PIT → | Crosby | Novak | Dewar | Lizotte | Malkin | Kindel | Lapierre | Robertson | Kuzmenko | Rakell | Koivunen | Chinakhov | Korczak | Girard | Letang | Carlile | Karlsson | Stastney |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newhook | 35 | 33 | 80 | 80 | 13 | 38 | 100 | 75 | 50 | 35 | 50 | 43 | 50 | 36 | 36 | 50 | 56 | 67 |
| Evans | 50 | 100 | 40 | 40 | 67 | 50 | 89 | 40 | 93 | 50 | 88 | 50 | 44 | 44 | 80 | 86 | 75 | 100 |
| Danault | 20 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 36 | 14 | 40 | — | 0 | 17 | 40 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 27 | 33 | 0 | 43 |
| Kapanen | 25 | 0 | 75 | 71 | 25 | 50 | 50 | 73 | 50 | 33 | 40 | 50 | 73 | 73 | 60 | 50 | 38 | 0 |
| Beck | 0 | 0 | 73 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 60 | 79 | 60 | 33 | 40 | 100 | 73 | 67 | 86 | 75 | 25 | 100 |
| Slafkovský | 41 | 35 | 100 | 80 | 14 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 39 | 50 | 25 | 42 | 36 | 22 | 38 | 56 | 71 |
| Texier | 17 | 0 | 50 | 75 | 25 | 31 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 20 | 50 | 30 | 33 | 100 | 22 | 27 | 44 | 0 |
| Kreider | 50 | 100 | 50 | 57 | 40 | 57 | 93 | 40 | 93 | 100 | 93 | 67 | 67 | 64 | 75 | 100 | 80 | 73 |
| Xhekaj | 0 | 0 | 73 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 79 | 50 | 0 | 40 | 100 | 73 | 67 | 86 | 75 | 0 | — |
| Caufield | 38 | 35 | 100 | 83 | 0 | 17 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 39 | 50 | 0 | 38 | 50 | 17 | 33 | 58 | 67 |
| Bolduc | 25 | 0 | 80 | 83 | 22 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 30 | 67 | 100 | 13 | 43 | 25 | 25 |
| Anderson | 33 | 50 | 33 | 33 | 57 | 50 | 88 | 33 | 87 | 25 | 83 | 50 | 57 | 44 | 62 | 86 | 73 | 90 |
| Guhle | 37 | 43 | 0 | 50 | 25 | 14 | 88 | 0 | 100 | 35 | 78 | 0 | 33 | 38 | 27 | 14 | 56 | 77 |
| Carrier | 44 | 46 | 0 | — | 29 | 0 | 88 | — | 83 | 41 | 88 | 17 | 33 | 29 | 27 | 29 | 67 | 92 |
| Hutson | 25 | 29 | 71 | 67 | 38 | 33 | 75 | 25 | 75 | 20 | 75 | 40 | 50 | 56 | 42 | 47 | 71 | 60 |
| Xhekaj | 0 | 0 | 67 | 62 | 33 | 56 | 67 | 73 | 60 | 20 | 56 | 63 | 67 | 53 | 64 | 75 | 25 | 25 |
| Dobson | 38 | 29 | 50 | 67 | 29 | 33 | 71 | 33 | 71 | 50 | 71 | 40 | 40 | 64 | 36 | 38 | 67 | 50 |
| Engstrom | 0 | 0 | 64 | 58 | 40 | 63 | 63 | 71 | 63 | 20 | 50 | 71 | 64 | 50 | 67 | 73 | 25 | 25 |
