Game Recap
A wild one ended 5-4 in favor of the St. Louis Blues over the Detroit Red Wings on Saturday. STL had the better of the chances at even strength, putting up 2.58 xG against 1.81 while holding 51.2% of shot attempts. Robert Thomas generated the most offense at even strength with 0.68 ixG on 2 shots. STL had a big edge in high-danger chances, 10-6 over DET at 5-on-5. DET outshot STL 28-15.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as St. Louis Blues vs Detroit Red Wings progressed on Oct 31, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
STL5 - 4DET
Oct 31, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| DET | P1 | 15 | 12 | 55.6 | 13 | 5 | 72.2 | 8 | 1 | 88.9 | 13 | 8 | 61.9 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 0.58 | 0.33 | 64.2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 14 | 21 | 40.0 | 11 | 14 | 44.0 | 8 | 8 | 50.0 | 10 | 14 | 41.7 | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 0.76 | 1.16 | 39.5 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| P3 | 23 | 14 | 62.2 | 15 | 10 | 60.0 | 12 | 6 | 66.7 | 16 | 11 | 59.3 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 0.89 | 1.26 | 41.2 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | |
| Total | 52 | 47 | 52.5 | 39 | 29 | 57.4 | 28 | 15 | 65.1 | 39 | 33 | 54.2 | 8 | 10 | 44.4 | 2.23 | 2.75 | 44.7 | 4 | 5 | 44.4 | |
| STL | P1 | 12 | 15 | 44.4 | 5 | 13 | 27.8 | 1 | 8 | 11.1 | 8 | 13 | 38.1 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 0.33 | 0.58 | 35.8 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 21 | 14 | 60.0 | 14 | 11 | 56.0 | 8 | 8 | 50.0 | 14 | 10 | 58.3 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 1.16 | 0.76 | 60.5 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| P3 | 14 | 23 | 37.8 | 10 | 15 | 40.0 | 6 | 12 | 33.3 | 11 | 16 | 40.7 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 1.26 | 0.89 | 58.8 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | |
| Total | 47 | 52 | 47.5 | 29 | 39 | 42.6 | 15 | 28 | 34.9 | 33 | 39 | 45.8 | 10 | 8 | 55.6 | 2.75 | 2.23 | 55.3 | 5 | 4 | 55.6 | |
Win Probability
DET Favored
STL Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
DET
STL
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
STL Attempts
DET Attempts
Individual Event Map
STL ShootDET Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Attempt Blocked
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (DET) performed against every skater on the away team (STL) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = DET players, Columns = STL players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the DET player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| DET ↓ / STL → | Thomas | McTavish | Kaskimaki | Suter | Holloway | McMichael | Neighbours | Buchnevich | Snuggerud | Berggren | Dvorsky | Toropchenko | Broberg | Carlo | Fowler | Jiricek | Barron | Lindstein |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finnie | 60 | 56 | 50 | 60 | 33 | 45 | 17 | 50 | 38 | 33 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 63 | 50 | 30 | 43 | 25 |
| Copp | 86 | 70 | 43 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 57 | 83 | 67 | 70 | 80 | 63 | 60 | 33 | 75 | 71 | 77 | 70 |
| Rasmussen | 50 | 33 | 38 | 38 | 30 | 36 | 20 | 23 | 29 | 33 | 45 | 50 | 42 | 43 | 28 | 26 | 55 | 67 |
| Danielson | 60 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 45 | 71 | 33 | 50 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 67 | 56 | 50 | 56 | 50 | 67 | 67 |
| Dries | 25 | — | 70 | 67 | 38 | 75 | 50 | 50 | 0 | — | 71 | 73 | 50 | 55 | 80 | 80 | 60 | 67 |
| Arvidsson | 62 | 64 | 50 | 60 | 13 | 38 | 17 | 46 | 29 | 50 | 33 | 50 | 57 | 67 | 43 | 17 | 43 | 25 |
| Raymond | 83 | 60 | 33 | 60 | 100 | 58 | 57 | 83 | 67 | 55 | 80 | 57 | 58 | 62 | 78 | 75 | 69 | 64 |
| Compher | 33 | 33 | 38 | 44 | 22 | 33 | 20 | 17 | 17 | 40 | 45 | 55 | 36 | 50 | 28 | 24 | 45 | 57 |
| Mazur | 25 | — | 70 | 67 | 43 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 0 | — | 67 | 70 | 50 | 55 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 50 |
| Brandsegg-Nygård | 71 | 64 | 43 | 50 | 67 | 33 | 57 | 67 | 67 | 58 | 80 | 63 | 50 | 29 | 67 | 57 | 71 | 64 |
| DeBrincat | 67 | 60 | 50 | 60 | 25 | 56 | 20 | 57 | 33 | 44 | 33 | 60 | 58 | 69 | 50 | 29 | 43 | 25 |
| Kolesar | 17 | 0 | 58 | 55 | 38 | 100 | 25 | 50 | 0 | — | 63 | 62 | 38 | 55 | 67 | 67 | 43 | 67 |
| Seider | 56 | 44 | 67 | 75 | 50 | 67 | 33 | 60 | 36 | 44 | 71 | 73 | 47 | 65 | 67 | 59 | 71 | 80 |
| Faulk | 50 | 29 | 55 | 44 | 38 | 17 | 42 | 43 | 29 | 25 | 45 | 60 | 42 | 43 | 40 | 43 | 47 | 40 |
| Wallinder | 73 | 17 | 50 | 56 | 21 | 7 | 56 | 17 | 60 | 13 | 38 | 67 | 33 | 33 | 25 | 31 | 50 | 50 |
| Chiarot | 20 | 44 | 56 | 50 | 29 | 67 | 17 | 33 | 11 | 57 | 67 | 56 | 31 | 50 | 54 | 47 | 50 | 50 |
| Englund | 57 | 88 | 17 | 29 | 45 | 63 | 25 | 70 | 33 | 83 | 50 | 44 | 57 | 44 | 63 | 40 | 57 | 56 |
| Johansson | 67 | 88 | 17 | 29 | 20 | 33 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 83 | 50 | 44 | 58 | 43 | 23 | 0 | 62 | 63 |
