Game Recap
The Columbus Blue Jackets fell to the Carolina Hurricanes 3-2 on Thursday. CAR had the better of the chances at even strength, putting up 2.24 xG against 1.78 while holding 52.8% of shot attempts. Keep an eye on Stankoven — 0.55 individual xG on 3 shots at 5-on-5. CBJ had a big edge in high-danger chances, 8-4 over CAR at 5-on-5.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Columbus Blue Jackets vs Carolina Hurricanes progressed on Oct 29, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
CBJ2 - 3CAR
Oct 29, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| CAR | P1 | 31 | 13 | 70.5 | 25 | 10 | 71.4 | 16 | 8 | 66.7 | 22 | 5 | 81.5 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | 1.65 | 0.59 | 73.8 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 12 | 14 | 46.2 | 6 | 10 | 37.5 | 5 | 7 | 41.7 | 8 | 10 | 44.4 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | 0.35 | 0.86 | 28.8 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 14 | 25 | 35.9 | 10 | 18 | 35.7 | 6 | 11 | 35.3 | 9 | 18 | 33.3 | 6 | 6 | 50.0 | 0.85 | 1.05 | 44.7 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| Total | 57 | 52 | 52.3 | 41 | 38 | 51.9 | 27 | 26 | 50.9 | 39 | 33 | 54.2 | 10 | 10 | 50.0 | 2.85 | 2.50 | 53.3 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | |
| CBJ | P1 | 13 | 31 | 29.5 | 10 | 25 | 28.6 | 8 | 16 | 33.3 | 5 | 22 | 18.5 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | 0.59 | 1.65 | 26.2 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 14 | 12 | 53.8 | 10 | 6 | 62.5 | 7 | 5 | 58.3 | 10 | 8 | 55.6 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | 0.86 | 0.35 | 71.2 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 25 | 14 | 64.1 | 18 | 10 | 64.3 | 11 | 6 | 64.7 | 18 | 9 | 66.7 | 6 | 6 | 50.0 | 1.05 | 0.85 | 55.3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| Total | 52 | 57 | 47.7 | 38 | 41 | 48.1 | 26 | 27 | 49.1 | 33 | 39 | 45.8 | 10 | 10 | 50.0 | 2.50 | 2.85 | 46.7 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | |
Win Probability
CAR Favored
CBJ Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
CAR
CBJ
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
CBJ Attempts
CAR Attempts
Individual Event Map
CBJ ShootCAR Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (CAR) performed against every skater on the away team (CBJ) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = CAR players, Columns = CBJ players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the CAR player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| CAR ↓ / CBJ → | Fantilli | Coyle | Johnson | Monahan | Sillinger | Del Bel Belluz | Knies | Heinen | Lomberg | Olivier | Nichushkin | Garland | Werenski | Mateychuk | Severson | Gudbranson | Fabbro | Christiansen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aho | 37 | 80 | 42 | 43 | 0 | — | 80 | 50 | — | 80 | 45 | 0 | 55 | 41 | 57 | 42 | 57 | 40 |
| Stankoven | 67 | 0 | 67 | 63 | 77 | 100 | 0 | 67 | 100 | 67 | 33 | 75 | 67 | 58 | 69 | 88 | 100 | 67 |
| Kotkaniemi | 50 | — | 100 | 100 | 100 | 56 | — | 38 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 64 | 55 | 0 |
| Martinook | 46 | 40 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 44 | 100 | 100 | 53 | 100 | 0 | 36 | 54 | 64 | 50 | 100 | 86 |
| Jankowski | 42 | 39 | 30 | 0 | 67 | 100 | 44 | 100 | 100 | 60 | 100 | 0 | 35 | 64 | 64 | 75 | 100 | 86 |
| Ehlers | 0 | — | 20 | 78 | 75 | 100 | — | 83 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 79 | 69 | 58 | 75 | 86 | 100 | 44 |
| Carrier | 47 | 100 | 50 | 0 | 0 | — | 100 | — | — | 100 | 47 | 0 | 57 | 45 | 60 | 36 | 40 | 57 |
| Robinson | 50 | 0 | 67 | 83 | 80 | 56 | 0 | 30 | 50 | — | 50 | 100 | 67 | 50 | 67 | 56 | 55 | 0 |
| Deslauriers | 33 | — | 100 | 80 | 50 | 56 | — | 30 | 50 | — | 50 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 33 | 56 | 55 | 0 |
| Svechnikov | 45 | 80 | 42 | 33 | 0 | — | 86 | 50 | — | 75 | 45 | 0 | 55 | 43 | 67 | 38 | 57 | 36 |
| Jarvis | 71 | 50 | 67 | 0 | 67 | 100 | 50 | 75 | 100 | 53 | 100 | 0 | 50 | 54 | 64 | 60 | 100 | 75 |
| Blake | 0 | 0 | 50 | 71 | 76 | 100 | 0 | 83 | 100 | 50 | 67 | 75 | 67 | 64 | 71 | 86 | 100 | 67 |
| Slavin | 33 | 36 | 35 | 44 | 67 | — | 36 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 33 | 50 | 37 | 40 | 46 | 55 | 43 | 40 |
| Chatfield | 33 | 36 | 35 | 44 | 67 | — | 36 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 33 | 50 | 37 | 40 | 46 | 55 | 43 | 40 |
| Miller | 47 | 44 | 43 | 20 | 25 | 60 | 50 | 43 | 60 | 57 | 50 | 33 | 42 | 43 | 88 | 25 | 60 | 56 |
| Walker | 50 | 47 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 53 | 50 | 60 | 57 | 57 | 0 | 44 | 45 | 100 | 25 | 60 | 56 |
| Gostisbehere | 0 | — | 100 | 74 | 64 | 80 | — | 58 | 80 | 50 | 80 | 73 | 64 | 67 | 64 | 70 | 82 | 80 |
| Välimäki | — | — | 100 | 71 | 71 | 80 | — | 67 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 70 | 67 | 80 | 64 | 80 | 78 | 100 |
