Calgary Flames vs Edmonton Oilers — October 28, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Edmonton Oilers posted a 4-0 shutout against the Calgary Flames on Wednesday. EDM generated 11 high-danger looks compared to just 7 from CGY. At 5-on-5, EDM carried the play with 2.53 expected goals and a 49.1% share of shot attempts. Shots on goal: EDM 32, CGY 24.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Calgary Flames vs Edmonton Oilers progressed on Oct 28, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

CGY0 - 4EDM

Oct 28, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
EDM	P1	19	18	51.4	16	13	55.2	9	8	52.9	12	14	46.2	2	3	40.0	0.71	0.61	53.9	1	0	100.0
	P2	18	24	42.9	12	20	37.5	7	11	38.9	13	16	44.8	5	3	62.5	0.90	1.38	39.3	1	0	100.0
	P3	25	12	67.6	23	8	74.2	16	5	76.2	18	9	66.7	8	1	88.9	1.90	0.30	86.4	2	0	100.0
	Total	62	54	53.4	51	41	55.4	32	24	57.1	43	39	52.4	15	7	68.2	3.51	2.29	60.5	4	0	100.0
CGY	P1	18	19	48.6	13	16	44.8	8	9	47.1	14	12	53.8	3	2	60.0	0.61	0.71	46.1	0	1	0.0
	P2	24	18	57.1	20	12	62.5	11	7	61.1	16	13	55.2	3	5	37.5	1.38	0.90	60.7	0	1	0.0
	P3	12	25	32.4	8	23	25.8	5	16	23.8	9	18	33.3	1	8	11.1	0.30	1.90	13.6	0	2	0.0
	Total	54	62	46.6	41	51	44.6	24	32	42.9	39	43	47.6	7	15	31.8	2.29	3.51	39.5	0	4	0.0

Win Probability

EDM Favored

CGY Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

EDM

CGY

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

CGY Attempts

EDM Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

CGY ShootEDM Shoot

Shot on Net

Missed Shot

Attempt Blocked

Hit

Hit Taken

Shot Blocked

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (EDM) performed against every skater on the away team (CGY) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = EDM players, Columns = CGY players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the EDM player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

EDM ↓ / CGY →	Backlund	Strome	Pospisil	Frost	Castagna	Sharangovich	Farabee	Suniev	Othmann	Gridin	Coronato	Klapka	Bahl	Nemec	Middleton	Whitecloud	Parekh	Kuznetsov
Draisaitl	52	50	71	43	50	50	69	40	0	50	67	0	47	40	75	61	30	50
McDavid	73	69	73	44	60	57	73	40	0	69	69	40	47	44	74	79	75	100
Nugent-Hopkins	36	33	100	50	100	67	31	67	—	33	23	100	63	63	45	25	11	50
Dach	30	38	100	0	—	0	36	50	—	38	25	100	63	63	25	8	14	100
Dickinson	100	43	43	36	20	57	100	38	—	44	33	29	20	33	67	40	36	36
Frederic	—	40	43	80	80	80	—	80	100	60	100	82	100	100	100	100	46	50
Formenton	67	38	43	45	20	71	50	57	—	40	25	33	17	33	71	60	36	36
Howard	—	40	43	100	80	100	—	100	100	60	100	82	100	100	100	100	50	54
Podkolzin	62	69	73	33	33	40	67	25	0	67	64	25	50	44	72	73	50	50
Kapanen	47	100	100	50	100	67	33	67	—	100	23	100	63	63	45	36	33	67
Michaels	—	40	43	67	78	80	—	67	100	60	100	73	100	100	80	80	46	50
Joseph	100	38	43	36	20	67	100	43	—	40	33	29	17	33	57	40	40	40
Shea	57	46	50	57	50	60	60	50	100	50	57	50	67	67	75	64	29	36
Murphy	54	46	50	71	50	75	60	67	100	55	57	40	63	63	80	70	38	40
Bouchard	50	56	75	27	50	50	58	33	—	52	55	40	48	45	72	58	30	67
Ekholm	41	58	75	33	0	40	62	25	—	57	55	25	50	45	75	50	36	67
Mukhamadullin	33	25	40	57	64	71	20	63	0	56	33	67	50	67	46	38	50	55
Emberson	33	0	25	33	60	60	20	50	0	44	25	64	25	60	33	27	44	50