Game Recap
The Buffalo Sabres blanked the San Jose Sharks 2-0 on October 27, 2026. BUF had a big edge in high-danger chances, 15-11 over SJS at 5-on-5. Zucker was the most dangerous skater at 5-on-5, racking up 0.79 individual expected goals on 5 shots. The numbers backed up the result — BUF generated 3.35 expected goals to SJS's 2.02 at 5-on-5 (52.8% Corsi). BUF peppered the net with 40 shots to SJS's 23.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Buffalo Sabres vs San Jose Sharks progressed on Oct 27, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
BUF2 - 0SJS
Oct 27, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| SJS | P1 | 25 | 20 | 55.6 | 20 | 18 | 52.6 | 12 | 17 | 41.4 | 19 | 16 | 54.3 | 5 | 6 | 45.5 | 1.04 | 1.48 | 41.3 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 20 | 30 | 40.0 | 9 | 22 | 29.0 | 4 | 14 | 22.2 | 19 | 20 | 48.7 | 7 | 8 | 46.7 | 0.82 | 1.66 | 33.1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 19 | 18 | 51.4 | 12 | 14 | 46.2 | 7 | 10 | 41.2 | 12 | 14 | 46.2 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | 0.72 | 1.18 | 37.8 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 64 | 68 | 48.5 | 41 | 54 | 43.2 | 23 | 41 | 35.9 | 50 | 50 | 50.0 | 14 | 18 | 43.8 | 2.58 | 4.32 | 37.4 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| BUF | P1 | 20 | 25 | 44.4 | 18 | 20 | 47.4 | 17 | 12 | 58.6 | 16 | 19 | 45.7 | 6 | 5 | 54.5 | 1.48 | 1.04 | 58.7 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 30 | 20 | 60.0 | 22 | 9 | 71.0 | 14 | 4 | 77.8 | 20 | 19 | 51.3 | 8 | 7 | 53.3 | 1.66 | 0.82 | 66.9 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 18 | 19 | 48.6 | 14 | 12 | 53.8 | 10 | 7 | 58.8 | 14 | 12 | 53.8 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | 1.18 | 0.72 | 62.2 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 68 | 64 | 51.5 | 54 | 41 | 56.8 | 41 | 23 | 64.1 | 50 | 50 | 50.0 | 18 | 14 | 56.3 | 4.32 | 2.58 | 62.6 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
Win Probability
SJS Favored
BUF Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
SJS
BUF
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
BUF Attempts
SJS Attempts
Individual Event Map
BUF ShootSJS Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Hit
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Takeaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (SJS) performed against every skater on the away team (BUF) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = SJS players, Columns = BUF players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the SJS player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| SJS ↓ / BUF → | Thompson | Norris | Ostlund | Helenius | McLeod | Kozak | Krebs | Benson | Malenstyn | Zucker | Quinn | Doan | Samuelsson | Dahlin | Power | Zellweger | Metsa | Crevier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Celebrini | 73 | 65 | 67 | 56 | 44 | 64 | 45 | 71 | 68 | 38 | 69 | 81 | 76 | 81 | 63 | 52 | 50 | 86 |
| Smith | 78 | 64 | 45 | 33 | 38 | 29 | 17 | 70 | 46 | 40 | 33 | 30 | 56 | 58 | 57 | 42 | 29 | 17 |
| Dellandrea | 33 | 50 | 0 | 33 | 40 | 44 | 40 | 20 | 40 | 50 | 0 | 20 | 40 | 36 | 0 | 22 | 67 | 57 |
| Goodrow | 8 | 20 | 0 | 11 | 17 | — | — | 8 | — | 13 | 0 | — | 10 | 8 | 20 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| Ostapchuk | 7 | 20 | 25 | 10 | 17 | — | — | 7 | — | 17 | 29 | 100 | 23 | 19 | 20 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| Misa | 50 | 50 | 50 | 25 | 40 | 17 | 29 | 33 | 27 | 40 | 50 | 33 | 42 | 36 | 27 | 40 | 50 | 50 |
| Toffoli | 67 | 64 | 50 | 50 | 57 | 80 | 80 | 60 | 67 | 57 | 50 | 40 | 60 | 50 | 0 | 57 | 82 | 83 |
| Stenberg | 60 | 63 | 64 | 50 | 44 | 64 | 50 | 58 | 68 | 38 | 67 | 80 | 74 | 73 | 61 | 52 | 0 | 83 |
| Marchment | 67 | 64 | 50 | 33 | 38 | 29 | 17 | 57 | 46 | 40 | 36 | 33 | 56 | 44 | 50 | 42 | 33 | 20 |
| Sherwood | 55 | 58 | 50 | 43 | 50 | 83 | 80 | 45 | 67 | 50 | 43 | 50 | 57 | 44 | 40 | 67 | 82 | 83 |
| Graf | 33 | 56 | 56 | 50 | 43 | 80 | 86 | 40 | 86 | 33 | 56 | 80 | 69 | 53 | 62 | 53 | 0 | 100 |
| Gaudette | 11 | 43 | 50 | 11 | 17 | 100 | — | 10 | 86 | 17 | 67 | 100 | 25 | 27 | 50 | 64 | 50 | 0 |
| Nurse | 34 | 45 | 38 | 33 | 36 | 50 | 0 | 34 | 33 | 36 | 38 | 69 | 47 | 36 | 52 | 38 | 25 | 55 |
| Trouba | 28 | 33 | 41 | 28 | 36 | 56 | 17 | 25 | 38 | 36 | 47 | 71 | 41 | 35 | 45 | 33 | 33 | 67 |
| Orlov | 57 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 27 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 20 | 43 | 33 | 48 | 36 | 55 | 43 | 43 | 50 |
| Dickinson | 67 | 43 | 57 | 67 | 38 | 57 | 63 | 50 | 63 | 38 | 57 | 57 | 60 | 63 | 36 | 50 | 60 | 33 |
| Kesselring | 56 | 75 | 57 | 67 | 50 | 67 | 70 | 63 | 70 | 50 | 50 | 54 | 68 | 60 | 58 | 69 | 67 | 67 |
| Cagnoni | 25 | 57 | 50 | 0 | 20 | 56 | 60 | 0 | 62 | 20 | 50 | 33 | 31 | 30 | 29 | 45 | 75 | 83 |
