Game Recap
The Utah Mammoth edged the Tampa Bay Lightning 5-4 in overtime on October 24, 2026. High-danger chances favored UTA by a wide margin: 10 to 4. At 5-on-5, UTA carried the play with 2.78 expected goals and a 52.2% share of shot attempts. Keep an eye on Lee — 0.60 individual xG on 4 shots at 5-on-5. Dmitri Simashev found the net 2 times.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Tampa Bay Lightning vs Utah Mammoth progressed on Oct 24, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
TBL4 - 5UTA (OT)
Oct 24, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| UTA | P1 | 13 | 22 | 37.1 | 12 | 19 | 38.7 | 9 | 12 | 42.9 | 10 | 17 | 37.0 | 2 | 6 | 25.0 | 0.69 | 1.82 | 27.4 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 |
| P2 | 21 | 20 | 51.2 | 16 | 15 | 51.6 | 8 | 11 | 42.1 | 15 | 15 | 50.0 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 1.07 | 1.10 | 49.4 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| P3 | 24 | 17 | 58.5 | 17 | 13 | 56.7 | 9 | 9 | 50.0 | 18 | 8 | 69.2 | 6 | 0 | 100.0 | 1.66 | 0.76 | 68.6 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| OT | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0.42 | 0.15 | 73.8 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 60 | 60 | 50.0 | 47 | 48 | 49.5 | 28 | 33 | 45.9 | 44 | 41 | 51.8 | 13 | 9 | 59.1 | 3.84 | 3.83 | 50.1 | 5 | 4 | 55.6 | |
| TBL | P1 | 22 | 13 | 62.9 | 19 | 12 | 61.3 | 12 | 9 | 57.1 | 17 | 10 | 63.0 | 6 | 2 | 75.0 | 1.82 | 0.69 | 72.6 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 |
| P2 | 20 | 21 | 48.8 | 15 | 16 | 48.4 | 11 | 8 | 57.9 | 15 | 15 | 50.0 | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 1.10 | 1.07 | 50.6 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| P3 | 17 | 24 | 41.5 | 13 | 17 | 43.3 | 9 | 9 | 50.0 | 8 | 18 | 30.8 | 0 | 6 | 0.0 | 0.76 | 1.66 | 31.4 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| OT | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0.15 | 0.42 | 26.2 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 60 | 60 | 50.0 | 48 | 47 | 50.5 | 33 | 28 | 54.1 | 41 | 44 | 48.2 | 9 | 13 | 40.9 | 3.83 | 3.84 | 49.9 | 4 | 5 | 44.4 | |
Win Probability
UTA Favored
TBL Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
UTA
TBL
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
TBL Attempts
UTA Attempts
Individual Event Map
TBL ShootUTA Shoot
Goal
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Hit
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (UTA) performed against every skater on the away team (TBL) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = UTA players, Columns = TBL players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the UTA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| UTA ↓ / TBL → | Cirelli | Guentzel | Point | Goncalves | Geekie | Girgensons | Hagel | Viel | Kucherov | Mikheyev | Holmberg | Sabourin | D'Astous | Carlson | Moser | Cernak | McDonagh | Lilleberg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hayton | 78 | 60 | 56 | 63 | 57 | 57 | 68 | 25 | 70 | 40 | 0 | 25 | 52 | 67 | 69 | 62 | 67 | 58 |
| Cooley | 56 | 56 | 67 | 67 | 75 | 56 | 40 | 60 | 60 | 43 | 14 | 75 | 50 | 70 | 67 | 46 | 50 | 60 |
| Trocheck | 67 | 33 | 17 | 50 | 67 | 89 | 32 | 50 | 25 | 86 | 63 | 67 | 56 | 30 | 100 | 58 | 55 | 80 |
| Schmaltz | 55 | 36 | 40 | 67 | 50 | 33 | 23 | 50 | 46 | 30 | 14 | 50 | 25 | 64 | 62 | 33 | 33 | 50 |
| Stenlund | 25 | 0 | 44 | 57 | 38 | 0 | 14 | 56 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 46 | 22 | 22 | 50 | 50 | 60 |
| McBain | 33 | 0 | 45 | 67 | 36 | 0 | 22 | 50 | 40 | 50 | 0 | 38 | 50 | 30 | 25 | 40 | 40 | 67 |
| Lee | 68 | 56 | 47 | 63 | 67 | 25 | 59 | 33 | 68 | 25 | 0 | 33 | 48 | 67 | 65 | 60 | 60 | 53 |
| Crouse | 57 | 25 | 33 | 63 | 100 | — | 29 | 100 | 42 | 25 | 20 | 100 | 60 | 39 | 60 | 0 | 33 | 100 |
| But | 0 | 0 | 33 | 25 | 30 | 0 | 20 | 43 | 25 | 50 | 0 | 30 | 33 | 25 | 14 | 20 | 33 | 40 |
| Yamamoto | 85 | 63 | 56 | 69 | 67 | 80 | 70 | 50 | 76 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 59 | 67 | 68 | 91 | 88 | 64 |
| Guenther | 33 | 43 | 67 | 67 | 50 | 70 | 31 | 40 | 50 | 73 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 67 | 50 | 60 | 53 | 29 |
| Keller | 63 | 67 | 80 | 71 | 40 | 70 | 50 | 40 | 67 | 57 | 50 | 40 | 78 | 63 | 45 | 63 | 62 | 71 |
| Sergachev | 46 | 31 | 52 | 70 | 86 | 57 | 28 | 75 | 64 | 44 | 10 | 75 | 64 | 48 | 61 | 60 | 57 | 73 |
| Weegar | 82 | 50 | 48 | 68 | 63 | 71 | 50 | 40 | 61 | 33 | 13 | 40 | 75 | 42 | 61 | 77 | 62 | 92 |
| Simashev | 57 | 53 | 31 | 25 | 33 | 60 | 45 | 31 | 30 | 57 | 33 | 33 | 44 | 55 | 33 | 41 | 36 | 33 |
| Peeke | 60 | 35 | 33 | 75 | 22 | 50 | 40 | 40 | 46 | 75 | 50 | 25 | 30 | 56 | 55 | 56 | 70 | 42 |
| Schmidt | 53 | 35 | 22 | 60 | 38 | 25 | 38 | 75 | 31 | 50 | 50 | 43 | 39 | 42 | 38 | 50 | 60 | 56 |
| DeSimone | 50 | 50 | 20 | 20 | 56 | 33 | 30 | 50 | 20 | 38 | 43 | 56 | 50 | 50 | 33 | 40 | 27 | 45 |
