Anaheim Ducks vs Philadelphia Flyers — October 24, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

A wild one ended 5-4 in favor of the Anaheim Ducks over the Philadelphia Flyers on Saturday. PHI had a big edge in high-danger chances, 11-7 over ANA at 5-on-5. A close game in the analytics too — PHI and ANA were nearly dead even in expected goals at 5-on-5 (2.21 vs 2.09). Keep an eye on Carlsson — 0.47 individual xG on 2 shots at 5-on-5. Michkov put up 2 goals. Shots on goal: PHI 32, ANA 26.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Anaheim Ducks vs Philadelphia Flyers progressed on Oct 24, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

ANA5 - 4PHI

Oct 24, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
PHI	P1	21	17	55.3	14	9	60.9	11	6	64.7	18	9	66.7	5	3	62.5	1.07	0.67	61.5	2	0	100.0
	P2	15	24	38.5	12	21	36.4	10	15	40.0	11	16	40.7	2	4	33.3	0.59	2.50	19.1	1	3	25.0
	P3	18	15	54.5	13	11	54.2	11	5	68.8	12	10	54.5	4	5	44.4	1.20	0.84	58.8	1	2	33.3
	Total	54	56	49.1	39	41	48.8	32	26	55.2	41	35	53.9	11	12	47.8	2.86	4.01	41.6	4	5	44.4
ANA	P1	17	21	44.7	9	14	39.1	6	11	35.3	9	18	33.3	3	5	37.5	0.67	1.07	38.5	0	2	0.0
	P2	24	15	61.5	21	12	63.6	15	10	60.0	16	11	59.3	4	2	66.7	2.50	0.59	80.9	3	1	75.0
	P3	15	18	45.5	11	13	45.8	5	11	31.3	10	12	45.5	5	4	55.6	0.84	1.20	41.2	2	1	66.7
	Total	56	54	50.9	41	39	51.2	26	32	44.8	35	41	46.1	12	11	52.2	4.01	2.86	58.4	5	4	55.6

Win Probability

PHI Favored

ANA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

PHI

ANA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

ANA Attempts

PHI Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

ANA ShootPHI Shoot

Goal

Shot on Net

Attempt Blocked

Hit

Shot Blocked

Giveaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (PHI) performed against every skater on the away team (ANA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = PHI players, Columns = ANA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the PHI player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

PHI ↓ / ANA →	Carlsson	Granlund	Washe	Nesterenko	McQueen	Gauthier	Killorn	Greer	Malott	Sennecke	Caulfield	Colangelo	LaCombe	Mitchell	Luneau	Helleson	Warren	Hinds
Dvorak	40	29	67	56	0	40	23	0	33	43	38	50	39	64	36	50	70	50
Couturier	30	27	25	43	50	30	33	14	50	38	28	20	38	44	25	0	88	0
Zegras	78	75	73	73	0	70	25	0	100	67	86	50	60	69	50	70	67	67
Acciari	45	38	100	50	0	42	14	0	50	43	44	50	36	60	25	100	40	50
Barkey	33	45	64	50	0	25	33	50	43	36	—	75	42	78	40	45	54	33
Gaucher	0	50	50	33	33	0	33	43	50	30	—	60	57	50	29	17	67	17
Bump	50	50	33	67	60	60	50	17	100	33	75	17	62	63	27	0	89	0
Cates	50	50	25	50	50	50	50	29	50	50	50	33	14	60	33	67	0	100
Michkov	100	60	46	56	50	100	38	29	50	50	50	20	17	62	40	62	43	80
Foerster	71	67	33	80	67	83	60	20	100	75	83	33	73	78	36	20	100	0
Martone	100	60	50	64	50	100	43	29	50	50	67	20	40	69	33	62	55	67
Knuble	33	43	50	33	33	25	33	38	50	33	—	60	50	67	29	20	56	17
Sanheim	35	25	27	33	0	36	20	0	25	25	33	0	29	50	27	33	47	44
Drysdale	50	67	58	67	40	33	45	44	67	67	50	67	73	64	43	46	90	25
Seeler	13	29	33	40	50	13	40	20	55	43	8	0	23	80	33	43	43	25
Ristolainen	71	33	40	45	40	63	30	29	0	33	50	45	50	57	23	50	71	25
Bonk	58	50	22	67	—	64	40	0	50	38	75	0	50	60	40	29	54	38
McDonald	67	—	64	50	22	50	22	42	—	0	100	54	46	57	18	60	67	33