Game Recap
The Edmonton Oilers ran away with it, beating the Utah Mammoth 6-2 on October 17, 2026. Lee was the most dangerous skater at 5-on-5, racking up 0.47 individual expected goals on 3 shots. Connor McDavid found the net 2 times. UTA won't like the result, but they can take something from the 5-on-5 numbers: 3.01 expected goals to EDM's 2.56. High-danger chances favored UTA by a wide margin: 13 to 8. UTA outshot EDM 28-21.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Edmonton Oilers vs Utah Mammoth progressed on Oct 17, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
EDM6 - 2UTA
Oct 17, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| UTA | P1 | 18 | 17 | 51.4 | 10 | 13 | 43.5 | 6 | 9 | 40.0 | 13 | 9 | 59.1 | 6 | 2 | 75.0 | 1.17 | 0.88 | 57.1 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 20 | 21 | 48.8 | 15 | 17 | 46.9 | 9 | 10 | 47.4 | 15 | 11 | 57.7 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 1.10 | 1.31 | 45.7 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 24 | 7 | 77.4 | 17 | 6 | 73.9 | 13 | 2 | 86.7 | 17 | 5 | 77.3 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 1.17 | 0.54 | 68.3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| Total | 62 | 45 | 57.9 | 42 | 36 | 53.8 | 28 | 21 | 57.1 | 45 | 25 | 64.3 | 14 | 9 | 60.9 | 3.44 | 2.73 | 55.8 | 2 | 6 | 25.0 | |
| EDM | P1 | 17 | 18 | 48.6 | 13 | 10 | 56.5 | 9 | 6 | 60.0 | 9 | 13 | 40.9 | 2 | 6 | 25.0 | 0.88 | 1.17 | 42.9 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 21 | 20 | 51.2 | 17 | 15 | 53.1 | 10 | 9 | 52.6 | 11 | 15 | 42.3 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 1.31 | 1.10 | 54.3 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 7 | 24 | 22.6 | 6 | 17 | 26.1 | 2 | 13 | 13.3 | 5 | 17 | 22.7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 0.54 | 1.17 | 31.7 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| Total | 45 | 62 | 42.1 | 36 | 42 | 46.2 | 21 | 28 | 42.9 | 25 | 45 | 35.7 | 9 | 14 | 39.1 | 2.73 | 3.44 | 44.2 | 6 | 2 | 75.0 | |
Win Probability
UTA Favored
EDM Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
UTA
EDM
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
EDM Attempts
UTA Attempts
Individual Event Map
EDM ShootUTA Shoot
Shot on Net
Hit
Shot Blocked
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (UTA) performed against every skater on the away team (EDM) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = UTA players, Columns = EDM players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the UTA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| UTA ↓ / EDM → | McDavid | Draisaitl | Dach | Hallander | Frederic | Formenton | Hyman | Howard | Podkolzin | Michaels | Joseph | Kapanen | Shea | Bouchard | Murphy | Ekholm | Walman | Emberson |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley | 69 | 63 | 57 | 33 | 0 | 63 | 29 | 33 | 63 | 56 | 63 | 56 | 62 | 69 | 38 | 75 | 33 | 44 |
| Hayton | 50 | 50 | 60 | 43 | 43 | 100 | 64 | 43 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 73 | 54 | 80 | 71 | 40 | 38 |
| Schmaltz | 54 | 33 | 27 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 25 | 60 | 43 | 50 | 33 | 38 | 46 | 54 | 33 | 20 | 44 | 56 |
| Trocheck | 56 | 63 | 57 | 25 | 0 | 73 | 29 | 25 | 63 | 67 | 63 | 33 | 50 | 62 | 55 | 82 | 27 | 38 |
| Stenlund | 33 | 33 | 100 | 55 | 55 | 100 | 83 | 55 | 33 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 88 | 17 | 83 | 17 | 88 | 92 |
| McBain | 50 | 50 | 83 | 55 | 55 | 100 | 83 | 55 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 83 | 88 | 20 | 83 | 20 | 78 | 85 |
| Lee | 40 | 44 | 60 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 64 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 55 | 64 | 47 | 76 | 67 | 44 | 43 |
| Crouse | 36 | 27 | 22 | 25 | 0 | 50 | 11 | 33 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 14 | 11 | 36 | 13 | 17 | 50 | 67 |
| But | 50 | 50 | 100 | 58 | 58 | 100 | 100 | 58 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 88 | 20 | 83 | 20 | 89 | 92 |
| Yamamoto | 46 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 64 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 71 | 50 | 75 | 54 | 81 | 67 | 33 | 30 |
| Guenther | 67 | 63 | 57 | 25 | 0 | 63 | 29 | 25 | 63 | 56 | 63 | 56 | 62 | 69 | 38 | 75 | 27 | 38 |
| Keller | 55 | 33 | 18 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 13 | 50 | 38 | 60 | 43 | 36 | 42 | 58 | 22 | 20 | 38 | 50 |
| Weegar | 50 | 50 | 70 | 36 | 22 | 80 | 44 | 36 | 55 | 80 | 80 | 50 | 53 | 48 | 54 | 47 | 43 | 86 |
| Sergachev | 55 | 44 | 71 | 50 | 40 | 50 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 71 | 62 | 48 | 43 | 40 | 50 | 100 |
| Simashev | 40 | 40 | 61 | 33 | 40 | 82 | 69 | 40 | 40 | 82 | 69 | 65 | 64 | 57 | 69 | 63 | 61 | 63 |
| Marino | 50 | 50 | 0 | 47 | 46 | 90 | 14 | 47 | 56 | 82 | 86 | 0 | 63 | 50 | 63 | 73 | 25 | 38 |
| Schmidt | 45 | 45 | 22 | 44 | 43 | 83 | 27 | 44 | 50 | 71 | 83 | 22 | 59 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 23 | 36 |
| Peeke | 25 | 33 | 59 | 60 | 75 | 70 | 63 | 75 | 33 | 70 | 58 | 59 | 50 | 57 | 55 | 67 | 67 | 69 |
