Utah Mammoth vs Edmonton Oilers — October 15, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Edmonton Oilers fell to the Utah Mammoth 4-2 on Thursday. UTA generated 15 high-danger looks compared to just 7 from EDM. The expected goals told the same story: UTA 1.96, EDM 1.63 at 5-on-5. Clayton Keller had a 2-goal game. Shots on goal: EDM 23, UTA 24.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Utah Mammoth vs Edmonton Oilers progressed on Oct 15, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

UTA4 - 2EDM

Oct 15, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
EDM	P1	11	20	35.5	7	14	33.3	3	7	30.0	7	17	29.2	2	9	18.2	0.27	1.17	18.8	0	1	0.0
	P2	21	22	48.8	17	17	50.0	12	10	54.5	13	14	48.1	4	8	33.3	1.14	1.33	46.1	1	2	33.3
	P3	26	15	63.4	15	9	62.5	9	8	52.9	14	10	58.3	6	2	75.0	0.67	0.48	58.1	1	1	50.0
	Total	58	57	50.4	39	40	49.4	24	25	49.0	34	41	45.3	12	19	38.7	2.08	2.98	41.0	2	4	33.3
UTA	P1	20	11	64.5	14	7	66.7	7	3	70.0	17	7	70.8	9	2	81.8	1.17	0.27	81.2	1	0	100.0
	P2	22	21	51.2	17	17	50.0	10	12	45.5	14	13	51.9	8	4	66.7	1.33	1.14	53.9	2	1	66.7
	P3	15	26	36.6	9	15	37.5	8	9	47.1	10	14	41.7	2	6	25.0	0.48	0.67	41.9	1	1	50.0
	Total	57	58	49.6	40	39	50.6	25	24	51.0	41	34	54.7	19	12	61.3	2.98	2.08	59.0	4	2	66.7

Win Probability

EDM Favored

UTA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

EDM

UTA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

UTA Attempts

EDM Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

UTA ShootEDM Shoot

Shot on Net

Missed Shot

Attempt Blocked

Hit

Takeaway

Giveaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (EDM) performed against every skater on the away team (UTA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = EDM players, Columns = UTA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the EDM player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

EDM ↓ / UTA →	Cooley	Schmaltz	Trocheck	Hayton	Stenlund	McBain	Lee	Crouse	But	Guenther	Yamamoto	Keller	Sergachev	Weegar	Marino	Schmidt	Peeke	Simashev
McDavid	50	54	55	100	82	78	100	57	75	57	100	50	64	64	62	44	100	100
Draisaitl	71	62	71	100	80	75	100	62	71	78	100	58	69	67	80	60	100	100
Frederic	25	40	25	42	—	50	42	50	0	25	36	25	40	40	45	42	25	25
Hallander	33	33	50	33	60	57	33	67	50	33	20	33	75	80	17	25	50	50
Samanski	29	50	17	—	29	25	—	0	29	29	—	0	50	100	14	25	17	20
Formenton	45	0	64	63	100	100	45	0	100	45	45	0	27	60	13	45	75	67
Jones	25	33	0	50	25	20	50	0	25	25	50	0	0	0	50	50	17	20
Howard	50	0	67	—	38	40	—	0	38	50	—	0	67	100	0	33	29	33
Podkolzin	56	57	56	100	80	75	100	57	71	64	100	52	65	63	67	43	67	100
Joseph	50	0	50	42	100	100	33	0	100	50	33	0	38	60	7	33	71	67
Michaels	56	0	69	56	100	100	42	0	100	56	42	0	30	50	14	56	71	67
Kapanen	0	20	0	45	100	0	45	67	0	0	40	20	33	50	36	45	25	25
Ekholm	38	42	64	83	67	64	86	53	56	44	83	38	53	59	67	29	75	88
Bouchard	73	61	64	56	73	67	60	62	63	77	56	55	65	63	62	43	100	100
Murphy	13	7	22	58	100	0	47	20	0	13	47	8	14	29	31	31	45	50
Shea	50	57	44	54	100	100	54	60	—	50	54	50	67	75	43	50	80	80
Mukhamadullin	45	0	45	20	43	38	13	20	43	45	0	0	33	50	10	38	33	18
Emberson	38	0	36	17	43	38	17	33	43	38	0	0	50	75	8	33	42	25