Toronto Maple Leafs vs Utah Mammoth — October 13, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Utah Mammoth prevailed 5-4 in a high-scoring affair against the Toronto Maple Leafs on October 13, 2026. UTA held a slight 6-5 edge in high-danger chances. At 5-on-5, UTA carried the play with 2.07 expected goals and a 60.0% share of shot attempts.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Toronto Maple Leafs vs Utah Mammoth progressed on Oct 13, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

TOR4 - 5UTA

Oct 13, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
UTA	P1	13	15	46.4	10	13	43.5	6	8	42.9	7	11	38.9	0	1	0.0	0.52	0.65	44.3	1	0	100.0
	P2	25	13	65.8	18	10	64.3	10	7	58.8	19	8	70.4	5	4	55.6	1.43	1.05	57.7	4	2	66.7
	P3	19	22	46.3	13	17	43.3	12	11	52.2	13	13	50.0	4	4	50.0	1.04	1.06	49.4	0	2	0.0
	Total	57	50	53.3	41	40	50.6	28	26	51.9	39	32	54.9	9	9	50.0	2.99	2.77	51.9	5	4	55.6
TOR	P1	15	13	53.6	13	10	56.5	8	6	57.1	11	7	61.1	1	0	100.0	0.65	0.52	55.7	0	1	0.0
	P2	13	25	34.2	10	18	35.7	7	10	41.2	8	19	29.6	4	5	44.4	1.05	1.43	42.3	2	4	33.3
	P3	22	19	53.7	17	13	56.7	11	12	47.8	13	13	50.0	4	4	50.0	1.06	1.04	50.6	2	0	100.0
	Total	50	57	46.7	40	41	49.4	26	28	48.1	32	39	45.1	9	9	50.0	2.77	2.99	48.1	4	5	44.4

Win Probability

UTA Favored

TOR Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

UTA

TOR

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

TOR Attempts

UTA Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

TOR ShootUTA Shoot

Shot on Net

Missed Shot

Hit

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (UTA) performed against every skater on the away team (TOR) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = UTA players, Columns = TOR players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the UTA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

UTA ↓ / TOR →	Matthews	Sissons	Roslovic	Blueger	Tavares	McKenna	Paul	Duhaime	Cowan	Nylander	Marchenko	Raddysh	Ekman-Larsson	McCabe	Stecher	Rielly	Blankenburg	Rifai
Cooley	33	50	57	75	50	43	40	56	56	36	27	47	64	50	53	57	—	63
Trocheck	55	33	70	80	62	70	0	50	76	50	38	72	73	58	33	73	75	56
Schmaltz	33	38	50	57	44	57	80	50	40	17	27	41	60	47	63	43	33	100
Stenlund	22	57	50	67	17	82	70	100	57	36	22	33	50	67	100	57	64	67
Hayton	80	78	67	100	60	75	71	—	85	64	60	91	69	75	63	80	70	80
McBain	25	50	33	71	0	86	67	100	50	50	25	60	44	75	100	33	50	67
Crouse	31	25	50	40	33	75	100	43	50	17	25	38	100	36	25	50	50	100
Lee	67	80	—	100	50	77	77	—	100	60	67	88	73	83	75	83	71	75
But	25	57	33	67	0	86	70	100	33	50	25	50	50	67	100	33	57	67
Guenther	33	75	57	78	64	67	80	56	59	38	33	58	70	64	56	57	—	67
Keller	38	50	33	57	50	75	100	50	25	0	17	42	100	46	63	33	0	100
Yamamoto	67	78	67	100	50	77	71	—	100	60	50	90	73	78	67	86	67	80
Sergachev	47	50	56	100	50	73	63	71	79	56	23	50	80	50	77	60	80	100
Marino	50	67	80	85	54	63	69	78	71	53	43	81	67	71	56	80	60	64
Schmidt	33	73	50	80	47	69	82	78	64	52	27	65	72	75	50	88	63	50
Weegar	41	50	53	100	50	83	75	75	85	50	23	53	86	50	67	67	63	71
Peeke	20	45	33	17	13	78	60	0	29	10	20	27	33	13	25	33	71	100
Simashev	20	25	20	17	0	60	43	0	17	0	20	13	0	13	40	20	50	100