Utah Mammoth vs Buffalo Sabres — October 10, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Utah Mammoth came away with a 4-1 victory over the Buffalo Sabres on October 10, 2026. UTA had the better of the chances at even strength, putting up 3.73 xG against 1.44 while holding 54.9% of shot attempts. Shots on goal: BUF 24, UTA 30.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Utah Mammoth vs Buffalo Sabres progressed on Oct 10, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

UTA4 - 1BUF

Oct 10, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
BUF	P1	16	26	38.1	13	20	39.4	7	12	36.8	9	17	34.6	1	7	12.5	0.40	1.92	17.3	1	1	50.0
	P2	15	29	34.1	6	21	22.2	4	8	33.3	10	20	33.3	2	5	28.6	0.61	1.33	31.6	0	2	0.0
	P3	31	20	60.8	20	15	57.1	13	10	56.5	22	13	62.9	12	3	80.0	1.85	1.34	57.9	0	1	0.0
	Total	62	75	45.3	39	56	41.1	24	30	44.4	41	50	45.1	15	15	50.0	2.86	4.59	38.4	1	4	20.0
UTA	P1	26	16	61.9	20	13	60.6	12	7	63.2	17	9	65.4	7	1	87.5	1.92	0.40	82.7	1	1	50.0
	P2	29	15	65.9	21	6	77.8	8	4	66.7	20	10	66.7	5	2	71.4	1.33	0.61	68.4	2	0	100.0
	P3	20	31	39.2	15	20	42.9	10	13	43.5	13	22	37.1	3	12	20.0	1.34	1.85	42.1	1	0	100.0
	Total	75	62	54.7	56	39	58.9	30	24	55.6	50	41	54.9	15	15	50.0	4.59	2.86	61.6	4	1	80.0

Win Probability

BUF Favored

UTA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

BUF

UTA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

UTA Attempts

BUF Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

UTA ShootBUF Shoot

Goal

Shot on Net

Missed Shot

Giveaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (BUF) performed against every skater on the away team (UTA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = BUF players, Columns = UTA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the BUF player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

BUF ↓ / UTA →	Cooley	Trocheck	Schmaltz	Stenlund	Hayton	McBain	Crouse	Lee	But	Guenther	Keller	Yamamoto	Sergachev	Weegar	Marino	Schmidt	Peeke	Simashev
Thompson	38	20	56	67	0	67	50	0	50	18	29	0	45	43	23	31	33	0
Ostlund	63	50	45	55	75	56	46	60	47	33	30	60	68	80	33	56	57	40
McLeod	46	54	33	60	33	80	38	17	50	46	13	17	47	50	20	42	50	78
Norris	18	14	14	40	20	63	25	0	33	17	14	0	24	47	8	29	0	0
Krebs	64	64	43	40	0	33	29	20	33	64	17	20	50	17	29	18	50	89
Kozak	57	57	—	—	17	—	—	17	—	57	—	17	40	20	0	0	80	100
Carrick	63	63	—	—	25	—	—	25	—	63	—	25	40	20	33	0	80	100
Benson	29	8	45	59	38	53	50	38	53	0	19	38	65	82	21	50	67	33
Malenstyn	27	33	0	0	13	0	—	13	0	27	0	13	29	25	0	0	80	60
Quinn	45	23	63	75	27	75	58	0	0	22	40	0	44	53	27	53	50	0
Danforth	45	50	29	50	0	33	40	0	33	45	17	0	38	20	11	22	50	63
Doan	33	40	33	47	60	43	25	80	43	25	27	80	58	80	35	31	50	50
Power	40	35	33	60	7	67	25	13	67	40	8	13	44	33	11	22	75	70
Dahlin	57	50	50	53	23	56	47	0	29	53	31	0	58	55	30	46	42	50
Samuelsson	31	45	23	44	0	33	38	0	33	29	21	0	25	38	33	30	44	71
Zellweger	54	50	20	50	14	67	13	17	67	47	11	22	33	23	23	17	71	100
Metsa	0	0	0	45	33	42	0	38	38	0	0	38	47	100	10	8	0	0
Crevier	0	0	100	56	27	50	100	23	50	0	14	30	47	47	12	14	0	50