Utah Mammoth vs New Jersey Devils — October 6, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

Goals came in bunches as the Utah Mammoth outlasted the New Jersey Devils 5-3 on October 6, 2026. Luke Evangelista found the net 2 times. High-danger chances at 5-on-5: NJD 12, UTA 9. A close game in the analytics too — NJD and UTA were nearly dead even in expected goals at 5-on-5 (2.28 vs 2.10).

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Utah Mammoth vs New Jersey Devils progressed on Oct 6, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

UTA5 - 3NJD

Oct 6, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
NJD	P1	15	18	45.5	12	11	52.2	11	8	57.9	12	13	48.0	3	5	37.5	1.01	0.81	55.4	1	1	50.0
	P2	22	25	46.8	15	18	45.5	10	14	41.7	18	17	51.4	6	6	50.0	1.13	1.58	41.6	1	3	25.0
	P3	32	20	61.5	18	17	51.4	12	10	54.5	24	11	68.6	10	6	62.5	1.28	1.25	50.4	1	1	50.0
	Total	69	63	52.3	45	46	49.5	33	32	50.8	54	41	56.8	19	17	52.8	3.41	3.65	48.3	3	5	37.5
UTA	P1	18	15	54.5	11	12	47.8	8	11	42.1	13	12	52.0	5	3	62.5	0.81	1.01	44.6	1	1	50.0
	P2	25	22	53.2	18	15	54.5	14	10	58.3	17	18	48.6	6	6	50.0	1.58	1.13	58.4	3	1	75.0
	P3	20	32	38.5	17	18	48.6	10	12	45.5	11	24	31.4	6	10	37.5	1.25	1.28	49.6	1	1	50.0
	Total	63	69	47.7	46	45	50.5	32	33	49.2	41	54	43.2	17	19	47.2	3.65	3.41	51.7	5	3	62.5

Win Probability

NJD Favored

UTA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

NJD

UTA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

UTA Attempts

NJD Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

UTA ShootNJD Shoot

Shot on Net

Hit

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (NJD) performed against every skater on the away team (UTA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = NJD players, Columns = UTA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the NJD player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

NJD ↓ / UTA →	Schmaltz	Trocheck	Cooley	Stenlund	Hayton	McBain	Crouse	But	Carcone	Lee	Keller	Guenther	Weegar	Schmidt	Sergachev	Marino	Peeke	Simashev
Hischier	53	60	46	55	20	75	56	38	38	40	36	27	64	54	62	67	36	42
Hughes	60	30	40	54	75	80	83	40	40	25	29	33	45	70	44	63	80	44
Rodrigues	0	67	29	83	60	60	33	33	50	50	14	38	67	63	46	40	78	33
Glass	29	25	0	0	60	60	67	0	0	0	22	0	57	43	20	0	100	50
Mercer	0	20	29	100	38	38	17	25	33	25	14	38	33	50	22	33	60	25
Lombardi	43	67	—	0	43	86	56	0	0	0	20	0	50	36	—	14	100	100
Boqvist	50	50	—	0	43	83	60	0	0	0	33	0	55	30	100	0	100	100
Bratt	60	33	43	40	75	80	83	14	14	25	33	33	37	78	41	71	67	44
Meier	57	73	43	71	67	83	50	60	60	40	56	43	80	67	90	71	59	22
Evangelista	73	50	60	69	33	50	60	60	60	40	50	43	77	64	90	67	46	30
Mantha	33	56	27	50	86	88	80	25	25	33	33	43	50	78	41	60	78	50
Gritsyuk	33	56	0	100	60	64	43	0	—	0	33	67	57	71	73	50	83	0
Hamilton	24	55	0	100	53	73	53	100	100	0	15	0	56	50	50	50	64	43
Hughes	73	38	53	64	67	78	67	50	50	29	45	54	54	74	58	50	86	75
Siegenthaler	13	44	18	25	36	56	36	50	50	17	18	8	29	22	30	33	56	33
Pesce	40	33	21	71	56	67	43	56	56	27	36	46	52	69	35	50	67	50
Dillon	17	0	0	21	0	0	33	20	21	0	17	0	38	0	11	17	29	14
Chisholm	75	0	0	23	0	67	75	21	23	0	50	0	56	0	20	20	29	38