Utah Mammoth vs Columbus Blue Jackets — October 3, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Utah Mammoth came away with a 4-1 victory over the Columbus Blue Jackets on October 3, 2026. CBJ won't like the result, but they can take something from the 5-on-5 numbers: 2.29 expected goals to UTA's 1.94. Schmaltz put up 2 goals. UTA outshot CBJ 31-18.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Utah Mammoth vs Columbus Blue Jackets progressed on Oct 3, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

UTA4 - 1CBJ

Oct 3, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
CBJ	P1	11	32	25.6	6	21	22.2	5	13	27.8	8	16	33.3	3	2	60.0	0.34	1.25	21.3	0	2	0.0
	P2	20	17	54.1	13	11	54.2	7	7	50.0	13	9	59.1	3	3	50.0	0.89	0.70	55.8	1	0	100.0
	P3	21	23	47.7	16	16	50.0	7	11	38.9	15	12	55.6	5	5	50.0	1.33	1.16	53.4	0	2	0.0
	Total	52	72	41.9	35	48	42.2	19	31	38.0	36	37	49.3	11	10	52.4	2.55	3.11	45.1	1	4	20.0
UTA	P1	32	11	74.4	21	6	77.8	13	5	72.2	16	8	66.7	2	3	40.0	1.25	0.34	78.7	2	0	100.0
	P2	17	20	45.9	11	13	45.8	7	7	50.0	9	13	40.9	3	3	50.0	0.70	0.89	44.2	0	1	0.0
	P3	23	21	52.3	16	16	50.0	11	7	61.1	12	15	44.4	5	5	50.0	1.16	1.33	46.6	2	0	100.0
	Total	72	52	58.1	48	35	57.8	31	19	62.0	37	36	50.7	10	11	47.6	3.11	2.55	54.9	4	1	80.0

Win Probability

CBJ Favored

UTA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

CBJ

UTA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

UTA Attempts

CBJ Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

UTA ShootCBJ Shoot

Shot on Net

Missed Shot

Attempt Blocked

Hit

Hit Taken

Shot Blocked

Takeaway

Giveaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (CBJ) performed against every skater on the away team (UTA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = CBJ players, Columns = UTA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the CBJ player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

CBJ ↓ / UTA →	Trocheck	Cooley	Schmaltz	McBain	Hayton	Stenlund	Crouse	Lee	Carcone	But	Keller	Guenther	Sergachev	Weegar	Schmidt	Marino	Simashev	Peeke
Fantilli	56	23	15	44	50	67	50	25	45	50	27	16	35	35	44	38	50	56
Johnson	50	31	29	50	55	67	54	27	60	67	38	23	38	41	47	45	57	43
Coyle	77	0	43	40	25	75	33	25	0	—	59	9	33	38	60	63	78	40
Monahan	60	86	50	40	33	17	33	86	17	21	33	83	44	56	30	50	56	36
Sillinger	77	25	63	60	33	50	50	33	0	0	71	30	56	14	60	70	73	43
Knies	43	36	25	50	55	67	54	38	67	67	33	25	33	41	54	50	60	60
Voronkov	67	100	40	20	0	29	0	100	31	15	0	50	55	44	13	33	44	38
Heinen	67	50	0	0	0	25	0	67	30	17	40	20	29	14	0	67	57	33
Lomberg	67	67	0	0	0	33	0	67	44	20	50	50	43	20	0	67	71	43
Nichushkin	56	67	40	33	20	27	20	57	25	20	33	60	60	50	10	13	40	38
Olivier	77	40	67	40	0	33	25	43	0	0	77	38	63	13	55	70	78	40
Garland	100	67	67	50	33	20	33	67	17	20	100	60	50	50	25	33	75	56
Werenski	65	38	35	20	25	55	29	57	38	44	43	33	31	38	50	57	80	58
Mateychuk	88	39	73	36	27	78	38	41	78	67	69	31	50	35	56	63	62	69
Gudbranson	13	11	8	42	38	8	44	40	0	0	11	20	13	18	21	33	29	9
Andrae	77	71	50	100	100	31	100	57	44	27	67	43	80	40	20	67	69	35
Soucy	67	36	38	75	67	20	67	44	29	25	54	25	55	22	11	33	85	63
Christiansen	—	0	0	36	38	17	38	0	0	17	—	0	20	20	50	50	17	17