Game Recap
Goals came in bunches as the Columbus Blue Jackets outlasted the Buffalo Sabres 6-3 on October 1, 2026. CBJ got the two points, but BUF held a 1.94-1.53 expected goals edge at even strength. CBJ held a slight 5-3 edge in high-danger chances. Matthew Knies had a 2-goal game. BUF outshot CBJ 26-22.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Buffalo Sabres vs Columbus Blue Jackets progressed on Oct 1, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
BUF3 - 6CBJ
Oct 1, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| CBJ | P1 | 20 | 15 | 57.1 | 14 | 11 | 56.0 | 8 | 6 | 57.1 | 15 | 11 | 57.7 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 1.01 | 0.84 | 54.5 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 |
| P2 | 8 | 29 | 21.6 | 8 | 19 | 29.6 | 6 | 13 | 31.6 | 7 | 23 | 23.3 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | 0.58 | 1.54 | 27.5 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| P3 | 11 | 12 | 47.8 | 9 | 10 | 47.4 | 9 | 7 | 56.3 | 7 | 6 | 53.8 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | 0.56 | 0.63 | 47.0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 39 | 56 | 41.1 | 31 | 40 | 43.7 | 23 | 26 | 46.9 | 29 | 40 | 42.0 | 6 | 5 | 54.5 | 2.15 | 3.01 | 41.7 | 6 | 3 | 66.7 | |
| BUF | P1 | 15 | 20 | 42.9 | 11 | 14 | 44.0 | 6 | 8 | 42.9 | 11 | 15 | 42.3 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 0.84 | 1.01 | 45.5 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 |
| P2 | 29 | 8 | 78.4 | 19 | 8 | 70.4 | 13 | 6 | 68.4 | 23 | 7 | 76.7 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | 1.54 | 0.58 | 72.5 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| P3 | 12 | 11 | 52.2 | 10 | 9 | 52.6 | 7 | 9 | 43.8 | 6 | 7 | 46.2 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | 0.63 | 0.56 | 53.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 56 | 39 | 58.9 | 40 | 31 | 56.3 | 26 | 23 | 53.1 | 40 | 29 | 58.0 | 5 | 6 | 45.5 | 3.01 | 2.15 | 58.3 | 3 | 6 | 33.3 | |
Win Probability
CBJ Favored
BUF Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
CBJ
BUF
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
BUF Attempts
CBJ Attempts
Individual Event Map
BUF ShootCBJ Shoot
Goal
Shot on Net
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Takeaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (CBJ) performed against every skater on the away team (BUF) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = CBJ players, Columns = BUF players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the CBJ player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| CBJ ↓ / BUF → | Thompson | Krebs | Norris | Ostlund | McLeod | Helenius | Carrick | Kulich | Benson | Malenstyn | Doan | Quinn | Dahlin | Power | Samuelsson | Crevier | Metsa | Grzelcyk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coyle | 35 | 100 | 58 | 25 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 9 | 100 | 35 | 23 | 29 | 71 | 45 | 71 | 75 | 75 |
| Sillinger | 46 | 100 | 60 | 33 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 20 | 100 | 46 | 20 | 40 | 71 | 50 | 60 | 75 | 75 |
| Fantilli | 25 | 56 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 57 | 40 | 50 | 40 | 25 | 50 | 33 | 55 | 63 | 57 | 13 | 33 |
| Johnson | 25 | 50 | 33 | 50 | 44 | 43 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 40 | 25 | 60 | 33 | 50 | 75 | 57 | 14 | 33 |
| Monahan | 0 | 50 | 0 | 38 | 50 | 33 | 100 | 67 | 27 | 100 | 0 | 25 | 18 | 40 | 43 | 50 | 33 | 50 |
| Knies | 33 | 38 | 43 | 40 | 38 | 38 | 50 | 40 | 38 | 40 | 33 | 45 | 20 | 44 | 50 | 53 | 20 | 33 |
| Heinen | 29 | 56 | 36 | 29 | 64 | 55 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 38 | 0 | 80 | 40 | 75 | 43 | 29 | 43 |
| Lomberg | 33 | 71 | 43 | 33 | 86 | 71 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 43 | 0 | 75 | 57 | 75 | 50 | 40 | 50 |
| Voronkov | 50 | 0 | 50 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 100 | 50 | 67 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Olivier | 60 | 100 | 64 | 43 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 29 | 100 | 60 | 29 | 54 | 57 | 50 | 60 | 75 | 75 |
| Nichushkin | 0 | 33 | 0 | 27 | 17 | 17 | 67 | 67 | 38 | 67 | 0 | 33 | 13 | 33 | 29 | 67 | 20 | 25 |
| Garland | 14 | 71 | 29 | 38 | 100 | 83 | 100 | 100 | 43 | 100 | 25 | 33 | 50 | 57 | 50 | 43 | 25 | 50 |
| Werenski | 21 | 56 | 43 | 18 | 75 | 50 | 100 | 75 | 11 | 100 | 23 | 18 | 23 | 42 | 44 | 41 | 40 | 50 |
| Mateychuk | 50 | 58 | 50 | 25 | 54 | 50 | 67 | 67 | 17 | 67 | 53 | 25 | 55 | 44 | 62 | 42 | 42 | 50 |
| Gudbranson | 9 | 43 | 50 | 50 | 43 | 38 | 60 | 50 | 30 | 50 | 9 | 21 | 29 | 50 | 67 | 67 | 13 | 33 |
| Andrae | 14 | 67 | 13 | 30 | 50 | 60 | 50 | 67 | 30 | 50 | 14 | 30 | 20 | 33 | 33 | 40 | 25 | 40 |
| Soucy | 50 | 80 | 38 | 33 | 44 | 57 | 33 | 50 | 25 | 33 | 50 | 40 | 38 | 50 | 50 | 75 | 33 | 50 |
| Christiansen | — | 60 | — | 67 | 60 | 57 | 75 | 50 | 71 | 67 | — | 50 | 60 | 70 | 60 | 100 | 17 | 50 |
