Game Recap
The Florida Panthers posted a 1-0 shutout against the Carolina Hurricanes on Tuesday. FLA had the better of the chances at even strength, putting up 1.24 xG against 0.57 while holding 63.6% of shot attempts. FLA held a slight 4-3 edge in high-danger chances.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Florida Panthers vs Carolina Hurricanes progressed on Sep 29, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
FLA1 - 0CAR (OT)
Sep 29, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| CAR | P1 | 6 | 13 | 31.6 | 5 | 8 | 38.5 | 3 | 6 | 33.3 | 5 | 9 | 35.7 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | 0.42 | 0.52 | 44.6 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 17 | 19 | 47.2 | 12 | 11 | 52.2 | 7 | 8 | 46.7 | 14 | 14 | 50.0 | 3 | 7 | 30.0 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 50.3 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 13 | 16 | 44.8 | 6 | 10 | 37.5 | 4 | 5 | 44.4 | 9 | 9 | 50.0 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 | 0.52 | 0.36 | 59.3 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| OT | 1 | 5 | 16.7 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0.05 | 0.23 | 18.9 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 37 | 53 | 41.1 | 24 | 32 | 42.9 | 15 | 20 | 42.9 | 29 | 36 | 44.6 | 8 | 11 | 42.1 | 1.93 | 2.03 | 48.7 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| FLA | P1 | 13 | 6 | 68.4 | 8 | 5 | 61.5 | 6 | 3 | 66.7 | 9 | 5 | 64.3 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | 0.52 | 0.42 | 55.4 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 19 | 17 | 52.8 | 11 | 12 | 47.8 | 8 | 7 | 53.3 | 14 | 14 | 50.0 | 7 | 3 | 70.0 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 49.7 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 16 | 13 | 55.2 | 10 | 6 | 62.5 | 5 | 4 | 55.6 | 9 | 9 | 50.0 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 | 0.36 | 0.52 | 40.7 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| OT | 5 | 1 | 83.3 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0.23 | 0.05 | 81.1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 53 | 37 | 58.9 | 32 | 24 | 57.1 | 20 | 15 | 57.1 | 36 | 29 | 55.4 | 11 | 8 | 57.9 | 2.03 | 1.93 | 51.3 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
Win Probability
CAR Favored
FLA Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
CAR
FLA
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
FLA Attempts
CAR Attempts
Individual Event Map
FLA ShootCAR Shoot
Missed Shot
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Hit Taken
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (CAR) performed against every skater on the away team (FLA) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = CAR players, Columns = FLA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the CAR player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| CAR ↓ / FLA → | Reinhart | Barkov | Eller | Lundell | Verhaeghe | Bennett | Luostarinen | Tkachuk | Tkachuk | Vilmanis | Imama | Hathaway | Jones | Mikkola | Forsling | Ekblad | Kulikov | Gudas |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aho | 38 | 44 | 80 | 78 | 67 | 75 | 71 | 33 | 50 | 100 | — | 80 | 40 | 69 | 78 | 75 | — | — |
| Staal | 14 | 17 | 50 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | — | — | 50 | 18 | 33 | 25 | 20 | 100 | — |
| Stankoven | 25 | 0 | 20 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 38 | 25 | 50 | 50 | — | 33 | 45 | 42 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 33 |
| Ehlers | 0 | 43 | — | 70 | — | — | 56 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — | 33 | 58 | 73 | 60 | 100 | — |
| Robinson | 33 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 40 | 40 | — | 0 | 50 | 100 | — | 100 | 0 | 60 | 63 | 50 | — | — |
| Hall | 0 | — | 20 | 67 | 75 | 100 | 43 | 0 | — | 55 | — | 33 | 50 | 45 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 50 |
| Martinook | 13 | 13 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 14 | 0 | — | — | — | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | — |
| Jankowski | 33 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 50 | — | 0 | 0 | 50 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carrier | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| Deslauriers | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| Blake | 50 | 80 | 29 | 65 | 50 | 33 | 53 | — | — | 50 | — | 40 | 58 | 62 | 61 | 56 | 50 | 50 |
| Svechnikov | 33 | 67 | 80 | 78 | 67 | 40 | 71 | 0 | 25 | 100 | — | 80 | 50 | 79 | 74 | 60 | — | — |
| Chatfield | 25 | 10 | 100 | 50 | 60 | 60 | 0 | 17 | 38 | 100 | — | 100 | 27 | 50 | 71 | 50 | 50 | 0 |
| Slavin | 25 | 10 | 60 | 50 | 60 | 60 | 0 | 17 | 38 | 67 | — | 100 | 23 | 40 | 71 | 50 | 50 | 0 |
| Miller | 14 | 20 | 100 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 20 | 0 | 100 | — | 100 | 33 | 100 | 25 | 0 | — | — |
| Walker | 13 | 17 | 100 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 17 | 0 | 100 | — | 100 | 29 | 100 | 20 | 0 | — | — |
| Gostisbehere | 25 | 67 | 13 | 65 | 67 | 100 | 50 | 0 | — | 33 | 0 | 17 | 42 | 53 | 59 | 71 | 33 | 25 |
| Alexis Legault | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 50 | 50 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 29 | 17 | 50 | 33 | 25 |
