Carolina Hurricanes vs Philadelphia Flyers — May 7, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Carolina Hurricanes defeated the Philadelphia Flyers 4-1 on May 7, 2026. High-danger chances at 5-on-5: CAR 6, PHI 4. CAR had the better of the chances at even strength, putting up 2.10 xG against 1.40 while holding 66.2% of shot attempts.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Carolina Hurricanes vs Philadelphia Flyers progressed on May 7, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

CAR4 - 1PHI

May 7, 2026 · Playoffs

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
PHI	P1	12	29	29.3	9	19	32.1	7	10	41.2	9	23	28.1	3	6	33.3	0.76	1.34	36.0	0	1	0.0
	P2	13	20	39.4	8	13	38.1	6	9	40.0	7	15	31.8	1	4	20.0	0.49	0.82	37.6	1	1	50.0
	P3	9	21	30.0	7	18	28.0	6	12	33.3	6	17	26.1	2	3	40.0	0.48	1.34	26.3	0	2	0.0
	Total	34	70	32.7	24	50	32.4	19	31	38.0	22	55	28.6	6	13	31.6	1.73	3.51	33.0	1	4	20.0
CAR	P1	29	12	70.7	19	9	67.9	10	7	58.8	23	9	71.9	6	3	66.7	1.34	0.76	64.0	1	0	100.0
	P2	20	13	60.6	13	8	61.9	9	6	60.0	15	7	68.2	4	1	80.0	0.82	0.49	62.4	1	1	50.0
	P3	21	9	70.0	18	7	72.0	12	6	66.7	17	6	73.9	3	2	60.0	1.34	0.48	73.7	2	0	100.0
	Total	70	34	67.3	50	24	67.6	31	19	62.0	55	22	71.4	13	6	68.4	3.51	1.73	67.0	4	1	80.0

Win Probability

PHI Favored

CAR Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

PHI

CAR

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

CAR Attempts

PHI Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

CAR ShootPHI Shoot

Shot on Net

Missed Shot

Attempt Blocked

Hit

Hit Taken

Shot Blocked

Giveaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (PHI) performed against every skater on the away team (CAR) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = PHI players, Columns = CAR players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the PHI player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

PHI ↓ / CAR →	Aho	Staal	Stankoven	Hall	Ehlers	Martinook	Jankowski	Carrier	Robinson	Jarvis	Svechnikov	Blake	Slavin	Chatfield	Miller	Walker	Gostisbehere	Nikishin
Couturier	11	45	33	20	56	38	0	0	0	22	14	40	27	31	29	57	20	33
Zegras	67	67	47	44	50	33	—	—	—	33	0	50	58	53	56	43	0	50
Dvorak	38	14	0	38	0	50	83	67	80	18	21	25	50	50	46	29	27	80
Glendening	9	23	40	25	50	29	0	0	0	18	10	40	25	30	17	50	13	33
Barkey	0	0	0	0	25	0	25	25	29	0	14	0	20	20	29	22	0	0
Bump	0	80	44	36	50	67	—	—	—	0	0	44	46	50	43	40	0	—
Konecny	60	63	29	33	50	43	100	80	80	50	67	38	53	58	57	50	60	75
Foerster	50	50	0	40	0	0	100	100	80	33	30	20	58	50	56	25	43	100
Martone	50	100	44	38	100	100	100	—	—	0	0	50	57	60	50	57	—	50
Hathaway	0	40	50	33	20	33	—	—	0	11	0	50	33	29	25	50	0	33
Grundstrom	0	0	—	—	0	0	25	25	29	0	0	—	33	33	20	20	0	0
Michkov	33	25	0	75	0	40	33	22	29	0	0	50	75	67	40	29	0	14
Sanheim	28	8	29	29	25	0	25	20	20	25	26	35	47	54	20	14	11	33
York	7	33	15	21	44	50	33	0	0	13	7	20	7	22	25	45	7	50
Ristolainen	29	33	33	38	27	40	40	25	20	25	27	55	60	70	29	27	10	60
Drysdale	0	80	23	23	75	67	—	—	—	0	0	25	13	24	43	63	0	0
Seeler	0	40	67	0	11	25	50	56	63	0	0	67	50	50	50	60	15	29
Andrae	0	60	100	—	67	33	63	63	71	20	0	100	75	60	60	67	33	43