Philadelphia Flyers vs Carolina Hurricanes — May 2, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Philadelphia Flyers couldn't find the back of the net as the Carolina Hurricanes cruised to a 3-0 win on May 2, 2026. CAR generated 9 high-danger looks compared to just 4 from PHI. Logan Stankoven found the net 2 times. The expected goals told the same story: CAR 1.59, PHI 1.19 at 5-on-5. CAR outshot PHI 23-19.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Philadelphia Flyers vs Carolina Hurricanes progressed on May 2, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

PHI0 - 3CAR

May 2, 2026 · Playoffs

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
CAR	P1	20	10	66.7	16	7	69.6	12	4	75.0	14	8	63.6	6	1	85.7	0.92	0.38	71.0	2	0	100.0
	P2	20	11	64.5	13	7	65.0	9	5	64.3	18	9	66.7	4	1	80.0	0.83	0.54	60.6	1	0	100.0
	P3	10	27	27.0	6	16	27.3	2	10	16.7	5	16	23.8	1	2	33.3	0.18	0.69	20.6	0	0	—
	Total	50	48	51.0	35	30	53.8	23	19	54.8	37	33	52.9	11	4	73.3	1.93	1.60	54.6	3	0	100.0
PHI	P1	10	20	33.3	7	16	30.4	4	12	25.0	8	14	36.4	1	6	14.3	0.38	0.92	29.0	0	2	0.0
	P2	11	20	35.5	7	13	35.0	5	9	35.7	9	18	33.3	1	4	20.0	0.54	0.83	39.4	0	1	0.0
	P3	27	10	73.0	16	6	72.7	10	2	83.3	16	5	76.2	2	1	66.7	0.69	0.18	79.4	0	0	—
	Total	48	50	49.0	30	35	46.2	19	23	45.2	33	37	47.1	4	11	26.7	1.60	1.93	45.4	0	3	0.0

Win Probability

CAR Favored

PHI Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

CAR

PHI

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

PHI Attempts

CAR Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

PHI ShootCAR Shoot

Shot on Net

Missed Shot

Attempt Blocked

Hit

Hit Taken

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (CAR) performed against every skater on the away team (PHI) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = CAR players, Columns = PHI players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the CAR player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

CAR ↓ / PHI →	Couturier	Dvorak	Glendening	Zegras	Barkey	Cates	Bump	Foerster	Konecny	Martone	Hathaway	Michkov	Sanheim	Ristolainen	York	Drysdale	Seeler	Juulsen
Aho	44	75	50	83	50	100	83	100	67	86	0	100	62	75	57	71	100	100
Staal	0	57	—	14	64	20	0	25	57	0	—	50	40	29	75	43	57	25
Stankoven	43	60	75	67	100	70	100	80	50	71	40	100	75	75	88	60	75	50
Jankowski	71	67	71	25	100	0	—	0	60	0	83	100	50	75	0	0	83	83
Ehlers	50	53	60	20	58	100	0	100	50	—	0	50	56	43	63	43	75	17
Robinson	71	100	71	—	100	0	—	0	67	0	83	100	—	100	33	0	86	83
Carrier	83	0	83	50	100	0	—	0	50	0	83	—	50	50	0	0	83	83
Hall	20	75	50	100	100	70	100	80	67	71	0	100	75	70	83	67	75	67
Martinook	—	54	—	33	64	50	0	50	57	0	—	50	50	43	67	60	60	40
Jarvis	44	100	50	83	75	100	86	100	100	86	0	100	62	80	64	83	100	100
Svechnikov	50	100	54	83	67	100	86	100	50	86	67	100	62	83	65	71	100	100
Blake	43	50	75	50	83	70	100	80	43	71	40	100	67	69	80	58	75	50
Miller	43	50	60	60	56	25	75	0	50	60	40	50	25	33	29	44	67	60
Chatfield	50	71	50	36	83	56	67	64	67	55	100	100	70	73	80	45	100	33
Gostisbehere	53	100	60	100	100	100	100	100	33	100	67	100	64	80	71	71	83	100
Slavin	—	69	—	36	82	56	67	64	69	55	—	100	70	71	86	50	100	33
Walker	50	44	50	60	56	0	75	33	44	67	50	50	25	40	17	50	63	67
Reilly	71	—	83	100	100	100	100	100	50	100	71	100	75	83	100	83	83	100