Game Recap
A lopsided 5-1 result saw the Montreal Canadiens blow by the Buffalo Sabres on Friday. MTL had a big edge in high-danger chances, 12-6 over BUF at 5-on-5. Keep an eye on Caufield — 0.32 individual xG on 1 shots at 5-on-5. Alex Newhook found the net 2 times. MTL had the better of the chances at even strength, putting up 2.31 xG against 1.53 while holding 45.5% of shot attempts. MTL outshot BUF 28-26.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Montreal Canadiens vs Buffalo Sabres progressed on May 8, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
MTL5 - 1BUF
May 8, 2026 · Playoffs
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| BUF | P1 | 17 | 25 | 40.5 | 13 | 20 | 39.4 | 8 | 13 | 38.1 | 10 | 17 | 37.0 | 1 | 10 | 9.1 | 0.74 | 1.78 | 29.3 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 21 | 18 | 53.8 | 15 | 13 | 53.6 | 11 | 8 | 57.9 | 14 | 13 | 51.9 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 0.90 | 1.05 | 46.2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 25 | 14 | 64.1 | 15 | 12 | 55.6 | 7 | 7 | 50.0 | 18 | 8 | 69.2 | 5 | 1 | 83.3 | 1.08 | 0.63 | 63.1 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 63 | 57 | 52.5 | 43 | 45 | 48.9 | 26 | 28 | 48.1 | 42 | 38 | 52.5 | 10 | 14 | 41.7 | 2.72 | 3.45 | 44.0 | 1 | 5 | 16.7 | |
| MTL | P1 | 25 | 17 | 59.5 | 20 | 13 | 60.6 | 13 | 8 | 61.9 | 17 | 10 | 63.0 | 10 | 1 | 90.9 | 1.78 | 0.74 | 70.7 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 18 | 21 | 46.2 | 13 | 15 | 46.4 | 8 | 11 | 42.1 | 13 | 14 | 48.1 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 1.05 | 0.90 | 53.8 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 14 | 25 | 35.9 | 12 | 15 | 44.4 | 7 | 7 | 50.0 | 8 | 18 | 30.8 | 1 | 5 | 16.7 | 0.63 | 1.08 | 36.9 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 57 | 63 | 47.5 | 45 | 43 | 51.1 | 28 | 26 | 51.9 | 38 | 42 | 47.5 | 14 | 10 | 58.3 | 3.45 | 2.72 | 56.0 | 5 | 1 | 83.3 | |
Win Probability
BUF Favored
MTL Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
BUF
MTL
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
MTL Attempts
BUF Attempts
Individual Event Map
MTL ShootBUF Shoot
Save
Goal Against
Missed Shot Against
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (BUF) performed against every skater on the away team (MTL) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = BUF players, Columns = MTL players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the BUF player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| BUF ↓ / MTL → | Suzuki | Danault | Newhook | Evans | Veleno | Dach | Slafkovský | Texier | Caufield | Anderson | Demidov | Bolduc | Matheson | Guhle | Hutson | Carrier | Dobson | Xhekaj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thompson | 50 | 50 | 63 | 63 | 43 | 75 | 50 | 44 | 50 | 53 | 33 | 75 | 63 | 69 | 50 | 57 | 25 | 0 |
| Norris | 80 | 100 | 61 | 63 | 50 | 50 | 71 | 100 | 80 | 100 | 29 | 50 | 90 | 63 | 73 | 92 | 60 | 0 |
| McLeod | 18 | 60 | 50 | 25 | 75 | 60 | 18 | 70 | 10 | 82 | 0 | 60 | 63 | 43 | 18 | 78 | 50 | 0 |
| Krebs | 100 | 38 | 43 | 33 | 50 | 75 | 100 | 44 | 100 | 33 | 40 | 80 | 33 | 88 | 56 | 33 | 80 | 50 |
| Kozak | 10 | 25 | 43 | 50 | 38 | 30 | 9 | 17 | 10 | 0 | 30 | 36 | 20 | 60 | 9 | 33 | 20 | 50 |
| Benson | 80 | 75 | 33 | 40 | 100 | 40 | 71 | 50 | 80 | 100 | 33 | 50 | 67 | 54 | 80 | 100 | 53 | — |
| Greenway | 13 | 25 | 50 | 50 | 29 | 33 | 6 | 25 | 13 | 33 | 23 | 25 | 20 | 60 | 12 | 38 | 29 | 43 |
| Zucker | 50 | 78 | 71 | 67 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 40 | 78 | 20 | 50 | 88 | 71 | 36 | 80 | 83 | 25 |
| Malenstyn | 0 | 0 | 67 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 33 |
| Tuch | 0 | 55 | 69 | 67 | 38 | 50 | 0 | 58 | 0 | 63 | 25 | 60 | 63 | 73 | 25 | 58 | 44 | 0 |
| Doan | 73 | 67 | 33 | 40 | 100 | 100 | 63 | 100 | 73 | 100 | 33 | 50 | 70 | 46 | 73 | 100 | 57 | 0 |
| Quinn | 44 | 60 | 50 | 29 | 50 | 33 | 38 | 70 | 29 | 75 | 20 | 33 | 50 | 56 | 38 | 60 | 69 | 20 |
| Dahlin | 46 | 58 | 61 | 61 | 25 | 0 | 30 | 25 | 42 | 60 | 25 | 17 | 71 | 57 | 47 | 56 | 43 | 14 |
| Power | 50 | 59 | 50 | 50 | 55 | 67 | 50 | 83 | 44 | 73 | 40 | 75 | 59 | 64 | 45 | 67 | 65 | 60 |
| Samuelsson | 23 | 0 | 27 | 14 | 20 | 25 | 21 | 13 | 23 | 0 | 11 | 18 | 11 | 33 | 29 | 13 | 14 | 0 |
| Byram | 36 | 50 | 40 | 33 | 42 | 56 | 33 | 75 | 36 | 67 | 30 | 63 | 40 | 60 | 31 | 46 | 59 | 60 |
| Timmins | 35 | 29 | 50 | 40 | 33 | 33 | 20 | 30 | 31 | 33 | 20 | 25 | 42 | 80 | 32 | 57 | 46 | — |
| Stanley | 20 | 50 | 40 | 40 | 100 | 100 | 20 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 30 | 100 | 64 | 29 | 22 | 67 | 40 | 33 |
