Pittsburgh Penguins vs Philadelphia Flyers — April 25, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Philadelphia Flyers fell to the Pittsburgh Penguins 4-2 on Saturday. The expected goals told the same story: PIT 2.22, PHI 1.82 at 5-on-5. Shots on goal: PHI 27, PIT 21.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Pittsburgh Penguins vs Philadelphia Flyers progressed on Apr 25, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

PIT4 - 2PHI

Apr 25, 2026 · Playoffs

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
PHI	P1	16	18	47.1	10	13	43.5	9	6	60.0	9	11	45.0	2	1	66.7	0.58	0.76	43.5	0	1	0.0
	P2	23	24	48.9	16	16	50.0	10	9	52.6	18	13	58.1	6	3	66.7	1.54	1.19	56.5	1	1	50.0
	P3	19	20	48.7	16	14	53.3	11	7	61.1	12	11	52.2	3	3	50.0	1.33	0.83	61.5	1	2	33.3
	Total	58	62	48.3	42	43	49.4	30	22	57.7	39	35	52.7	11	7	61.1	3.45	2.78	55.4	2	4	33.3
PIT	P1	18	16	52.9	13	10	56.5	6	9	40.0	11	9	55.0	1	2	33.3	0.76	0.58	56.5	1	0	100.0
	P2	24	23	51.1	16	16	50.0	9	10	47.4	13	18	41.9	3	6	33.3	1.19	1.54	43.5	1	1	50.0
	P3	20	19	51.3	14	16	46.7	7	11	38.9	11	12	47.8	3	3	50.0	0.83	1.33	38.5	2	1	66.7
	Total	62	58	51.7	43	42	50.6	22	30	42.3	35	39	47.3	7	11	38.9	2.78	3.45	44.6	4	2	66.7

Win Probability

PHI Favored

PIT Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

PHI

PIT

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

PIT Attempts

PHI Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

PIT ShootPHI Shoot

Shot on Net

Hit

Hit Taken

Shot Blocked

Takeaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (PHI) performed against every skater on the away team (PIT) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = PHI players, Columns = PIT players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the PHI player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

PHI ↓ / PIT →	Crosby	Malkin	Dewar	Acciari	Lizotte	Novak	Kindel	Soderblom	Rust	Rakell	Mantha	Chinakhov	Karlsson	Wotherspoon	Letang	Girard	Shea	Solovyov
Zegras	50	—	54	25	42	—	17	0	64	56	13	50	64	63	0	11	27	38
Couturier	63	46	50	33	60	38	40	—	63	63	40	42	69	86	38	43	25	25
Dvorak	25	50	50	70	50	67	75	67	67	25	67	75	50	60	80	60	73	50
Glendening	43	30	50	33	60	33	50	—	43	43	50	40	64	86	29	29	25	25
Barkey	33	0	14	17	17	0	50	0	0	50	50	25	33	33	0	0	14	20
Cates	50	20	83	0	75	0	—	0	67	60	50	0	62	60	0	0	—	—
Konecny	57	60	60	67	55	75	60	50	75	57	50	67	60	58	82	56	71	63
Martone	50	50	57	33	46	67	67	60	63	50	50	60	67	64	60	44	45	56
Foerster	42	38	83	0	75	0	25	14	58	50	17	0	65	67	0	0	0	0
Tippett	50	—	50	71	50	—	43	0	70	57	44	100	67	73	50	0	56	25
Hathaway	50	43	50	50	50	38	0	—	50	50	0	38	67	67	33	38	50	50
Michkov	0	0	25	71	33	0	—	0	71	0	100	0	25	25	50	0	71	0
Sanheim	56	45	45	44	45	25	50	0	61	59	40	33	58	50	40	25	50	50
York	40	28	33	14	33	23	50	33	44	44	38	31	47	50	27	27	13	14
Drysdale	33	36	57	33	46	36	50	20	50	33	38	46	77	73	27	26	22	29
Ristolainen	57	60	33	83	50	50	50	67	68	57	56	50	69	78	58	33	80	60
Seeler	33	0	25	25	25	0	29	20	0	50	33	20	25	40	0	0	40	50
Juulsen	33	50	40	40	40	67	50	20	0	50	50	75	43	50	67	67	33	40