Pittsburgh Penguins vs Philadelphia Flyers — April 22, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Philadelphia Flyers came away with a 5-2 victory over the Pittsburgh Penguins on April 22, 2026. A close game in the analytics too — PHI and PIT were nearly dead even in expected goals at 5-on-5 (1.59 vs 1.52). Shots on goal: PHI 29, PIT 30.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Pittsburgh Penguins vs Philadelphia Flyers progressed on Apr 22, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

PIT2 - 5PHI

Apr 22, 2026 · Playoffs

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
PHI	P1	21	18	53.8	16	15	51.6	10	11	47.6	12	10	54.5	3	1	75.0	1.01	0.99	50.3	0	1	0.0
	P2	22	24	47.8	18	18	50.0	15	7	68.2	16	16	50.0	3	3	50.0	1.21	0.90	57.3	3	0	100.0
	P3	11	25	30.6	7	19	26.9	4	12	25.0	9	18	33.3	3	4	42.9	0.63	1.34	32.1	2	1	66.7
	Total	54	67	44.6	41	52	44.1	29	30	49.2	37	44	45.7	9	8	52.9	2.85	3.23	46.8	5	2	71.4
PIT	P1	18	21	46.2	15	16	48.4	11	10	52.4	10	12	45.5	1	3	25.0	0.99	1.01	49.7	1	0	100.0
	P2	24	22	52.2	18	18	50.0	7	15	31.8	16	16	50.0	3	3	50.0	0.90	1.21	42.7	0	3	0.0
	P3	25	11	69.4	19	7	73.1	12	4	75.0	18	9	66.7	4	3	57.1	1.34	0.63	67.9	1	2	33.3
	Total	67	54	55.4	52	41	55.9	30	29	50.8	44	37	54.3	8	9	47.1	3.23	2.85	53.2	2	5	28.6

Win Probability

PHI Favored

PIT Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

PHI

PIT

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

PIT Attempts

PHI Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

PIT ShootPHI Shoot

Shot on Net

Hit

Shot Blocked

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (PHI) performed against every skater on the away team (PIT) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = PHI players, Columns = PIT players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the PHI player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

PHI ↓ / PIT →	Crosby	Lizotte	Malkin	Acciari	Kindel	Dewar	Novak	Rakell	Rust	Chinakhov	Mantha	Brazeau	Karlsson	Wotherspoon	Letang	Girard	Shea	Clifton
Zegras	25	68	20	86	22	64	25	40	25	40	20	33	43	68	43	25	71	78
Dvorak	7	100	55	100	0	100	83	13	24	25	82	50	45	30	42	58	100	100
Glendening	29	100	33	100	25	100	100	33	25	75	100	0	25	60	50	50	100	100
Couturier	27	100	50	100	33	100	100	33	22	86	100	0	36	67	60	67	100	100
Barkey	—	25	100	25	0	20	50	—	0	0	50	—	—	—	25	33	25	33
Cates	22	58	45	62	0	44	71	22	50	40	50	0	69	91	38	40	44	50
Foerster	15	67	29	85	11	67	63	25	31	31	11	22	48	74	29	27	65	78
Martone	22	80	83	94	0	71	83	43	17	75	90	75	61	65	71	64	100	100
Konecny	0	100	88	100	0	100	86	25	25	0	91	75	58	42	56	69	100	—
Tippett	0	71	13	71	13	75	25	9	22	14	11	22	20	25	8	25	50	71
Michkov	—	50	100	50	0	60	75	—	80	50	67	—	100	100	25	67	70	50
Hathaway	29	100	75	100	0	100	100	38	29	83	100	0	38	64	67	67	100	100
Sanheim	8	80	43	82	17	78	71	21	17	33	29	33	40	39	17	38	100	100
Drysdale	50	75	62	92	9	63	63	33	50	29	62	14	56	76	48	39	64	60
York	17	67	48	100	0	57	70	20	38	8	53	0	45	57	31	47	60	50
Ristolainen	10	80	27	83	20	67	75	18	5	100	67	50	28	44	18	10	100	100
Seeler	17	60	33	60	17	50	83	38	20	33	100	50	46	100	43	67	29	67
Juulsen	14	63	33	63	11	63	100	25	100	67	100	60	75	100	22	83	43	78