Philadelphia Flyers vs Pittsburgh Penguins — April 20, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Philadelphia Flyers blanked the Pittsburgh Penguins 3-0 on April 20, 2026. Dig into the 5-on-5 data, and PIT had the better of it (2.63 xG to 1.08). Sometimes the bounces just don't go your way. PIT generated 11 high-danger looks compared to just 5 from PHI. PIT outshot PHI 27-23.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Philadelphia Flyers vs Pittsburgh Penguins progressed on Apr 20, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

PHI3 - 0PIT

Apr 20, 2026 · Playoffs

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
PIT	P1	19	9	67.9	12	6	66.7	2	5	28.6	14	6	70.0	2	3	40.0	0.55	0.40	58.0	0	0	—
	P2	28	19	59.6	19	15	55.9	12	13	48.0	18	11	62.1	6	2	75.0	1.14	0.89	56.1	0	2	0.0
	P3	28	10	73.7	19	9	67.9	13	6	68.4	24	7	77.4	5	3	62.5	1.49	0.90	62.3	0	1	0.0
	Total	75	38	66.4	50	30	62.5	27	24	52.9	56	24	70.0	13	8	61.9	3.19	2.19	59.2	0	3	0.0
PHI	P1	9	19	32.1	6	12	33.3	5	2	71.4	6	14	30.0	3	2	60.0	0.40	0.55	42.0	0	0	—
	P2	19	28	40.4	15	19	44.1	13	12	52.0	11	18	37.9	2	6	25.0	0.89	1.14	43.9	2	0	100.0
	P3	10	28	26.3	9	19	32.1	6	13	31.6	7	24	22.6	3	5	37.5	0.90	1.49	37.7	1	0	100.0
	Total	38	75	33.6	30	50	37.5	24	27	47.1	24	56	30.0	8	13	38.1	2.19	3.19	40.8	3	0	100.0

Win Probability

PIT Favored

PHI Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

PIT

PHI

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

PHI Attempts

PIT Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

PHI ShootPIT Shoot

Attempt Blocked

Hit

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (PIT) performed against every skater on the away team (PHI) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = PIT players, Columns = PHI players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the PIT player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

PIT ↓ / PHI →	Couturier	Dvorak	Glendening	Zegras	Barkey	Cates	Foerster	Martone	Konecny	Tippett	Hathaway	Michkov	Ristolainen	Sanheim	York	Drysdale	Seeler	Juulsen
Crosby	67	36	89	40	71	73	71	25	25	57	100	80	30	57	74	40	83	100
Malkin	67	63	83	57	60	86	80	63	56	40	86	100	72	71	73	63	71	100
Lizotte	33	75	75	43	50	33	43	33	75	75	50	50	100	0	75	44	67	50
Acciari	40	75	75	43	50	20	38	33	75	75	50	33	75	0	75	40	60	50
Novak	71	63	83	50	33	100	75	63	56	33	71	—	71	50	63	63	78	50
Dewar	67	60	75	75	100	50	75	50	60	75	50	100	75	0	75	67	75	67
Kindel	100	0	100	67	78	80	75	0	0	33	67	82	82	73	33	50	50	83
Soderblom	100	—	100	0	67	67	50	0	—	0	100	73	77	75	0	0	40	67
Rust	78	38	88	50	71	83	88	27	27	60	100	80	45	61	75	44	88	100
Rakell	67	63	80	33	67	77	70	60	50	38	80	80	53	62	83	50	78	—
Chinakhov	83	38	100	80	0	100	100	38	36	67	83	—	73	43	54	58	83	80
Mantha	100	0	100	0	78	84	82	0	0	33	67	82	84	70	33	0	67	86
Karlsson	60	60	90	38	50	44	46	33	50	63	100	50	64	61	79	36	78	67
Girard	100	64	100	80	91	78	70	67	64	63	50	80	69	67	79	62	75	75
Letang	—	60	—	100	89	86	93	67	60	71	0	83	82	78	75	60	79	86
Shea	73	33	80	40	40	75	67	0	0	25	80	100	50	45	63	50	71	100
Wotherspoon	56	43	100	36	50	40	38	22	43	57	83	67	82	64	50	25	71	50
Clifton	75	0	82	25	50	67	33	0	0	0	82	100	54	54	57	50	50	—